<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rpmj</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Research'n Practical Medicine Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Research and Practical Medicine Journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2410-1893</issn><publisher><publisher-name>"QUASAR", LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17709/2410-1893-2024-11-2-5</article-id><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">QQDWZS</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">rpmj-1001</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обмен опытом</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Experience exchange</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Предикторная модель определения показаний к автоматизированному 3D УЗИ для скрининга женщин с низким риском развития опухолей молочной железы</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Predictive model for determining the indications for automated 3D ultrasound for screening patients at low risk of developing breast tumors</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8193-6657</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гаранина</surname><given-names>А. Э.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Garanina</surname><given-names>A. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> </p><p>Гаранина Анна Эдуардовна – аспирант кафедры лучевой диагностики ФГБОУ ВО «Северо-Западный государственный медицинский университет им. И. И. Мечникова», г. Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация; врач ультразвуковой диагностики Клиники СМТ АО «Поликлинический комплекс», г. Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация</p><p>ORCID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8193-6657" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8193-6657</ext-link>, SPIN: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=1186608" ext-link-type="uri">8668-3521</ext-link>, AuthorID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=1186608" ext-link-type="uri">1186608</ext-link></p><p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p> </p><p>Anna E. Garanina – PhD student of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics, I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; ultrasound doctor, СМТ Clinic AO, Polyclinic Complex, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</p><p>ORCID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8193-6657" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8193-6657</ext-link>, SPIN: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?spin=8668-3521" ext-link-type="uri">8668-3521</ext-link>, AuthorID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?spin=8668-3521" ext-link-type="uri">1186608</ext-link></p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">anna.garanina.90@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-1530</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Холин</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kholin</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> </p><p>Холин Александр Васильевич – д.м.н., профессор, заведующий кафедрой лучевой диагностики ФГБОУ ВО «Северо-Западный государственный медицинский университет им. И. И. Мечникова», г. Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация</p><p>ORCID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-1530" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-1530</ext-link>, SPIN: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?authorid=100279" ext-link-type="uri">9791-8550</ext-link>, AuthorID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?authorid=100279" ext-link-type="uri">100279</ext-link>, Scopus Author ID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7004225462" ext-link-type="uri">7004225462</ext-link></p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p> </p><p>Alexander V. Kholin – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics, I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</p><p>ORCID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-1530" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-1530</ext-link>, SPIN: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=100279" ext-link-type="uri">9791-8550</ext-link>, AuthorID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.elibrary.ru/author_profile.asp?id=100279" ext-link-type="uri">100279</ext-link>, Scopus Author ID: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7004225462" ext-link-type="uri">7004225462</ext-link></p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">holin1959@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Северо-Западный государственный медицинский университет им. И. И. Мечникова; &lt;p&gt;&#13;
Клиника СМТ АО «Поликлинический комплекс» &lt;p&gt;&#13;
г. Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University;&lt;p&gt;&#13;
СМТ Clinic AO, Polyclinic Complex&lt;p&gt;&#13;
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Северо-Западный государственный медицинский университет им. И. И. Мечникова; &lt;p&gt;&#13;
г. Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University;&lt;p&gt;&#13;
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Гаранина А.Э., Холин А.В., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гаранина А.Э., Холин А.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Garanina A.E., Kholin A.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/1001">https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/1001</self-uri><abstract><p>Автоматизированное ультразвуковое исследование молочной железы (3D УЗИ) является важным инструментом в диагностике рака молочной железы (РМЖ). Установлено, что 3D УЗИ обладает высокой воспроизводимостью, низкой зависимостью от оператора, меньшими временными затратами на получение изображений, автоматической трехмерной реконструкцией всей молочной железы.</p><sec><title>Цель исследования</title><p>Цель исследования. Разработать показания к 3D УЗИ на основании предикторных моделей скрининга пациенток с низким риском развития опухолей молочной железы на основе выявления наиболее значимых факторов риска.</p></sec><sec><title>Пациенты и методы</title><p>Пациенты и методы. С февраля 2019 по май 2023 г. проводилось ретропроспективное клиническое исследование. Всего в исследование были включены 2794 пациентки. Всем пациентам проводили клинический осмотр, пальпацию, собрали информацию о социально-демографических данных и потенциальных факторах риска РМЖ, также было проведено 2D УЗИ. В выборку до 40 лет вошли 1511 пациенток, из них 628 выполнено 3D УЗИ. В выборку 40 лет и старше вошли 1283 пациенток, из них 655 выполнено 3D УЗИ. У пациенток от 40 лет и старше проводилась маммография. Фиксировались количественные и качественные показатели анамнеза и клинического осмотра, а также результаты маммографии у пациенток старше 40 лет. На основании этих данных составлялась логистическая регрессия с последующим подбором наиболее значимой модели путем отсечения незначимых факторов по p-уровню значимости и представлением модели в виде ROC-кривой.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Были выявлены наиболее значимые факторы риска выявления РМЖ. На их основании скрининг с 3D УЗИ в выборке до 40 лет в 95,96 % можно использовать, и он не показан в 4,04 %. Представленная модель в выборке до 40 лет сработала корректно в 99,21 %. В то время как скрининг с 3D УЗИ в выборке 40 лет и старше в 84,26 % целесообразен и не показан в 15,74 %. Представленная модель сработала корректно в 97,12 %.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Исследование выявило важные преддиагностические факторы для выбора алгоритма обследования молочной железы у женщин разных возрастных групп и определило показания для 3D УЗИ. Разработанные алгоритмы помогут оптимизировать скрининг и направление на дополнительные обследования, что имеет практическую значимость для улучшения диагностики и оптимизации ресурсов здравоохранения.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Automatic ultrasound examination of the breast (3D ultrasound) has become an important tool in the diagnosis of breast cancer. It is believed that 3D ultrasound has high reproducibility, low dependence on the operator, less time spent on obtaining images, and automatic three-dimensional reconstruction of the entire breast.</p><sec><title>Purpose of the study</title><p>Purpose of the study. To develop indications for 3D ultrasound based on predictive screening models for patients with a low risk of developing breast tumors based on the identification of the most significant risk factors.</p></sec><sec><title>Patients and methods</title><p>Patients and methods. A retro-prospective clinical study has been conducted from February 2019 to May 2023. A total of 2794 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent clinical examination, palpation, collected information on socio-demographic data and potential risk factors for breast cancer, and 2D ultrasound was also performed. The group under the age of 40 included 1,511 patients, of whom 628 underwent 3D ultrasound. The sample of 40 years and older included 1,283 patients, 655 of whom underwent 3D ultrasound. Mammography was performed in patients aged 40 and older. Quantitative and qualitative indicators of anamnesis and clinical examination, as well as MMH results in patients over 40 years old, were recorded. Based on these data, a logistic regression was compiled, followed by the selection of the most significant model by cutting off insignificant factors according to the p-level of significance and presenting the model as a ROC curve.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The most significant risk factors for the detection of breast cancer were identified. Based on their screening with 3D ultrasound in a group up to 40 years of age, it can be used in 95.96 % and is not indicated in 4.04 %. The presented model in the group up to 40 years worked correctly in 99.21 %. While screening with 3D ultrasound in a group of 40 years and older in 84.26 % is appropriate and not indicated in 15.74 %. The presented model worked correctly in 97.12 %.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. The study identified important pre-diagnostic factors for the choice of a diagnostic algorithm for breast examination in women of different age groups, and determined the indications for 3D ultrasound. The developed algorithms will help optimize screening and referral for additional examinations, which is of practical importance for improving diagnostics and optimizing healthcare resources.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак молочной железы</kwd><kwd>ультразвуковое исследование</kwd><kwd>автоматизированное объемное сканирование молочных желез</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>breast cancer</kwd><kwd>ultrasound</kwd><kwd>automated volumetric breast scanning</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">финансирование данной работы не проводилось.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">this work was not funded.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guo R, Lu G, Qin B, Fei B. Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Jan;44(1):37–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.012</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guo R, Lu G, Qin B, Fei B. Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Jan;44(1):37–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.012</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Moy L. Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Aug;50(2):377–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26654</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Moy L. Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Aug;50(2):377–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26654</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rix A, Piepenbrock M, Flege B, von Stillfried S, Koczera P, Opacic T, et al. Effects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound treatment on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Theranostics. 2021 Sep 21;11(19):9557–9570. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.64767</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rix A, Piepenbrock M, Flege B, von Stillfried S, Koczera P, Opacic T, et al. Effects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound treatment on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Theranostics. 2021 Sep 21;11(19):9557–9570. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.64767</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang L, Wang S, Zhang L, Sheng C, Song F, Wang P, Huang Y. Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):499. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06992-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang L, Wang S, Zhang L, Sheng C, Song F, Wang P, Huang Y. Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):499. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06992-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Suter MB, Pesapane F, Agazzi GM, Gagliardi T, Nigro O, Bozzini A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast. 2020 Oct;53:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.06.005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Suter MB, Pesapane F, Agazzi GM, Gagliardi T, Nigro O, Bozzini A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast. 2020 Oct;53:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.06.005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаранина А. Э., Холин А. В. Современные методы визуализации образований молочных желез (обзорная статья). Онкологический журнал: лучевая диагностика, лучевая терапия. 2023;6(3):41–48. https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2023-6-3-41-48</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garanina AE, Kholin AV. Modern Methods of Imaging of Breast Neoplasms (Literature Review). Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2023;6(3):41–48. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37174/2587-7593-2023-6-3-41-48</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW, Inciardi MF, Guingrich JA, Hashimoto BE, et al. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):663–673. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132832</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW, Inciardi MF, Guingrich JA, Hashimoto BE, et al. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):663–673. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132832</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120621</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120621</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L, Leifland K. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Sep;85(9):1554–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L, Leifland K. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Sep;85(9):1554–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 5;92(13):1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 5;92(13):1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Narayan AK, Lee CI, Lehman CD. Screening for Breast Cancer. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Nov;104(6):1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Narayan AK, Lee CI, Lehman CD. Screening for Breast Cancer. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Nov;104(6):1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xin Y, Zhang X, Yang Y, Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhou X, Qiao Y. A multicenter, hospital-based and non-inferiority study for diagnostic efficacy of automated whole breast ultrasound for breast cancer in China. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 6;11(1):13902. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93350-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xin Y, Zhang X, Yang Y, Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhou X, Qiao Y. A multicenter, hospital-based and non-inferiority study for diagnostic efficacy of automated whole breast ultrasound for breast cancer in China. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 6;11(1):13902. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93350-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гажонова В. Е., Ефремова М. П., Бачурина Е. М., Хлюстина Е. М., Поткин С. Б. Возможности сонотомографии (автоматического объемного сканирования молочных желез) в оценке железистого типа строения молочных желез как фактора риска возникновения рака молочной железы. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2015;(5):5–10. https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2015-0-5-32-41</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gazhonova VE, Efremova MP, Bachurina EM, Khlyustina EM, Potkin SB. Capabilities of breast sonotomography (automated breast volume sonography) in the evaluation of the glandular structure of the breast in the context of its cancer risk. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2015;(5):5–10. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2015-0-5-32-41</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):355–365. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2412051710</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):355–365. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2412051710</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang ZL, Xu JH, Li JL, Huang Y, Tang J. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography. Radiol Med. 2012 Dec;117(8):1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-012-0836-4 Epub 2012 Jun 28. Erratum in: Radiol Med. 2012 Dec;117(8):1443. Xw, Jian Hong [corrected to Xu, Jian Hong].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang ZL, Xu JH, Li JL, Huang Y, Tang J. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography. Radiol Med. 2012 Dec;117(8):1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-012-0836-4 Epub 2012 Jun 28. Erratum in: Radiol Med. 2012 Dec;117(8):1443. Xw, Jian Hong [corrected to Xu, Jian Hong].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang Q, Hu B, Hu B, Li WB. Detection of breast lesions using an automated breast volume scanner system. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(1):300–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001204000130</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang Q, Hu B, Hu B, Li WB. Detection of breast lesions using an automated breast volume scanner system. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(1):300–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001204000130</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xiao YM, Chen ZH, Zhou QC, Wang Z. The efficacy of automated breast volume scanning over conventional ultrasonography among patients with breast lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;131(3):293–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.036</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xiao YM, Chen ZH, Zhou QC, Wang Z. The efficacy of automated breast volume scanning over conventional ultrasonography among patients with breast lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;131(3):293–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.036</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, Sandhaug M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Stoeblen F. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study. Acta Radiol. 2015 Apr;56(4):404–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114528835</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, Sandhaug M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Stoeblen F. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study. Acta Radiol. 2015 Apr;56(4):404–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114528835</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim SH, Kim HH, Moon WK. Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts. Korean J Radiol. 2020 Jan;21(1):15–24. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0176</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim SH, Kim HH, Moon WK. Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts. Korean J Radiol. 2020 Jan;21(1):15–24. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0176</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klein Wolterink F, Ab Mumin N, Appelman L, Derks-Rekers M, Imhof-Tas M, Lardenoije S, et al. Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study. Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10568-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klein Wolterink F, Ab Mumin N, Appelman L, Derks-Rekers M, Imhof-Tas M, Lardenoije S, et al. Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study. Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10568-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gatta G, Somma F, Sardu C, De Chiara M, Massafra R, Fanizzi A, et al. Automated 3D Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography Programs in Dense Breast: Literature Review and Metanalysis. J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 4;13(12):1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13121683</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gatta G, Somma F, Sardu C, De Chiara M, Massafra R, Fanizzi A, et al. Automated 3D Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography Programs in Dense Breast: Literature Review and Metanalysis. J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 4;13(12):1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13121683</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Foglia E, Marinelli S, Garagiola E, Ferrario L, Depretto C, Cartia F, et al. Budget impact analysis of breast cancer screening in Italy: The role of new technologies. Health Serv Manage Res. 2020 May;33(2):66–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951484819870963</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foglia E, Marinelli S, Garagiola E, Ferrario L, Depretto C, Cartia F, et al. Budget impact analysis of breast cancer screening in Italy: The role of new technologies. Health Serv Manage Res. 2020 May;33(2):66–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951484819870963</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang HY, Jiang YX, Zhu QL, Zhang J, Dai Q, Liu H, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3190–3200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.034</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang HY, Jiang YX, Zhu QL, Zhang J, Dai Q, Liu H, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3190–3200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.034</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chang JM, Cha JH, Park JS, Kim SJ, Moon WK. Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations. Acta Radiol. 2015 Oct;56(10):1163–1170.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chang JM, Cha JH, Park JS, Kim SJ, Moon WK. Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations. Acta Radiol. 2015 Oct;56(10):1163–1170.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaplan SS. Automated whole breast ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 May;52(3):539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2014.01.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaplan SS. Automated whole breast ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 May;52(3):539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2014.01.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
