Predictors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence after surgical treatment
https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2024-11-3-5
EDN: WPLTFC
Abstract
Purpose of the study. To study the CT semiotics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) to determine the prognostic markers of recurrence. To analyze the association between CT characteristics of ICC and mutations in IDH1/2, MET, KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2, EGFR, FGFR genes.
Materials and methods. We analyzed databases and diagnostic images of Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery and Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center for the period from April 2016 to January 2022 using the key queries «intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma», «liver», «hepatocellular carcinoma», «metastases», «radio genomics». 142 patients with liver neoplasms were identified, including 90 cases of ICC, 31 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and 21 cases of metastatic liver lesions, all morphologically verified (histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of biopsy material).
Results. Associations between CT features and mutations of MET and IDH1/2 genes were determined. According to the results of statistical analysis all four CT-signs, such as bile duct dilatation, capsule retraction, presence of dropout foci and tissue volume changes, are correlated with the probability of recurrence (death) in patients with ICC.
Conclusion. In a retrospective study, our results emphasize the potential prognostic significance of CT signs of ICC. We identified CT signs that allow differential diagnosis of ICC with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer metastases. We also identified associations between CT signs of ICC and mutations of IDH1/2 and MET genes, which may allow us to non-invasively obtain data on clinically significant molecular markers of tumors to apply a personalized approach to patient treatment.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. V. Kondratyev
Moscow, Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Kondratyev – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Senior Researcher, Department of Radiation Diagnostic Methods, A. V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-3391, SPIN: 2702-6526, Author ID: 243610, Scopus Author ID: 55865664400, ResearcherID: ABD-5758-2020
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
A. D. Smirnova
Moscow, Russian Federation
Alexandra D. Smirnova – radiologist, postgraduate student of the Department of Radiation Diagnostic Methods, A. V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
G. G. Karmazanovsky
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Moscow, Russian Federation
Grigory G. Karmazanovsky – academician of RAS, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Radiational Diagnostic Methods A. V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation; Professor at the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Biology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9357-0998, SPIN: 5964-2369, Author ID: 338639, Scopus Author ID: 55944296600
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
A. S. Tyan
Moscow, Russian Federation
Alexandra S. Tyan – a candidate for a scientific degree, A. V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4193-7413, SPIN: 9110-9827, AuthorID: 1236915
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
N. N. Britskaya
Moscow, Russian Federation
Natalia N. Britskaya – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), oncologist of the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, doctoral student, A. S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
M. G. Efanov
Moscow, Russian Federation
Mikhail G. Efanov – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Head of the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, A. S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0738-7642, SPIN: 2249-6620, AuthorID: 703434, Scopus Author ID: 25932094900
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
B. N. Gurmikov
Moscow, Russian Federation
Beslan N. Gurmikov – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of Oncological Department of Surgical Methods of Treatment, A. V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5958-3608, SPIN: 1322-3629, Author ID: 727742, Scopus Author ID: 57211081722
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
References
1. Gurmikov BN, Kovalenko YuA, Vishnevsky VA, Chzhao AV. Molecular genetic aspects of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma : literature review. Advances in Molecular Oncology. 2019;6(1):37–43. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/2313-805x-2019-6-1-37-43
2. Karmazanovsky GG. The role of MDCT and MRI in the diagnosis of focal liver diseases. Annals of HPB Surgery. 2019;24(4):91–110. (In Russ.). doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2019491-110
3. Baheti AD, Thirumani SH, Sinagare AB, Rosenthal MH, Hornik JL, Ramaiah NH, Wolpin BM. Correlation of CT patterns of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at presentation with metastatic spread and clinical outcomes: a retrospective study of 92 patients. Abdominalimaging. 2014; 39(6):1193–1201. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0167-0
4. Fujita N, Asayama Y, Nishie A, Ishigami K, Ushijima Y, Takayama Y, et al. Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Enhancement patterns in the arterial phase of dynamic hepatic CT – Correlation with clinicopathological findings. Eur Radiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):498–506. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4386-3
5. Xu X, Mao Y, Tang Y, Liu Y, Xue C, Yue Q, et al. Classification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Radiomic Analysis. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Feb 21;2022:5334095. doi: 10.1155/2022/5334095
6. Aherne EA, Pak LM, Goldman DA, Gonen M, Jarnagin WR, Simpson AL, Do RK. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: can imaging phenotypes predict survival and tumor genetics? Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Oct;43(10):2665–2672. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1505-4
7. Chung YE, Kim MJ, Park YN, Choi JY, Pyo JY, Kim YC, et al. Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):683–700. doi: 10.1148/rg.293085729
8. Popov EV, Krivonogov NG, Okrugin SA, Sazonova SI. Radiomic image analysis in cardiology: possibilities and prospects of application : a review. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2022;2(13):7–15. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2022-13-2-7-15
9. Mar WA, Shon AM, Lu Y, Yu JH, Berggruen SM, Guzman G, et al. Imaging spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma: role in diagnosis, staging, and posttreatment evaluation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Mar;41(3):553–567. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0583-9
10. Robertson S, Hyder O, Dodson R, Nayar SK, Poling J, Beierl K, et al. The frequency of KRAS and BRAF mutations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and their correlation with clinical outcome. Hum Pathol. 2013 Dec;44(12):2768–2773. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.07.026
11. Yang L, Dong D, Fang M, Zhu Y, Zang Y, Liu Z, et al. Can CT-based radiomics signature predict KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer? EurRadiol. 2018 May;28(5):2058–2067. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5146-8
12. Borger DR, Tanabe KK, Fan KC, Lopez HU, Fantin VR, Straley KS, et al. Frequent mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and IDH2 in cholangiocarcinoma identified through broad-based tumor genotyping. Oncologist. 2012;17(1):72–79. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0386
13. Kim SA, Lee JM, Lee KB, Kim SH, Yoon SH, Han JK, Choi BI. Intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas: enhancement patterns at multiphasic CT, with special emphasis on arterial enhancement pattern – correlation with clinicopathologic findings. Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):148–157. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101777
14. Liu N, Wu Y, Tao Y, Zheng J, Huang X, Yang L, Zhang X. Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma through MRI Radiomics. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 11;15(22):5373. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225373
15. Wang X, Wang S, Yin X, Zheng Y. MRI-based radiomics distinguish different pathological types of hepatocellular carcinoma. Comput Biol Med. 2022 Feb;141:105058. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105058
16. Taouli B, Hoshida Y, Kakite S, Chen X, Tan PS, Sun X, et al. Imaging-based surrogate markers of transcriptome subclasses and signatures in hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4472–4481. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4844-6
Review
For citations:
Kondratyev E.V., Smirnova A.D., Karmazanovsky G.G., Tyan A.S., Britskaya N.N., Efanov M.G., Gurmikov B.N. Predictors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence after surgical treatment. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2024;11(3):65-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2024-11-3-5. EDN: WPLTFC