Preview

Research and Practical Medicine Journal

Advanced search

Surgical treatment of inguinal hernias in children: review of methods and outcomes

https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2025-12-1-8

EDN: EXGFJT

Abstract

Inguinal hernias in children are one of the most common surgical diseases that occur mainly at an early age. The lack of proper treatment can lead to serious complications requiring emergency surgery. Modern treatment approaches make it possible to minimize these risks through the introduction of minimally invasive methods that take into account the anatomical and physiological characteristics of children.

Purpose of the study. The aim was to analyze the literature data on the methods of surgical treatment and postoperative management of children with inguinal hernias, as well as to substantiate modern approaches focused on the age and anatomical and physiological characteristics of patients.

Materials and methods. A systematic search and analysis of the results of publications and online resources for the period from 2019 to 2024 was carried out. All publications were indexed in the PubMed, e Library, Scholar, and CyberLeninka databases.  The search was carried out by keywords: "surgical treatment of inguinal hernias in children", "congenital inguinal hernia", "laparoscopic hernioplasty in children". The following criteria were applied to exclude irrelevant publications: the exclusion of duplicate data from different sources, as well as the exclusion of work related to the correction of inguinal hernias in the adult population. 

Results. Minimally invasive treatments such as LASSO (Laparoscopically Assisted Simple Suturing Obliteration) and SEAL (Subcutaneous Endoscopic Assisted Ligation) show the best results, including minimal duration of operations, low complication rate and short period of hospitalization. The PIRS (Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing) method is also effective, although it is inferior to LASSO and SEAL. The LPEC (Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure) technique has average performance. The Duhamel-1 and Duhamel-2 methods are characterized by a high duration of operations, long hospitalization, and a higher incidence of complications.

Conclusion. Minimally invasive methods, especially LASSO and SEAL, are preferred due to their high efficiency and safety. The Duhamel-1 and Duhamel-2 methods are significantly inferior to modern approaches but remain relevant due to their simplicity and lack of need for special equipment.

About the Authors

S. S. Khilko
https://ma.cfuv.ru/about/
S.I. Georgievsky Medical Institute of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Simferopol, Russian Federation

 

Sergey S. Khilko – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy, S.I. Georgievsky Medical Institute of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1721-4964

SPIN: 9877-5488, AuthorID: 776966

Scopus Author ID: 14052175800

Web of Science ResearcherID: P-1679-2015


Competing Interests:

The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.



M. Yu. Morozova
https://ma.cfuv.ru/about/
S.I. Georgievsky Medical Institute of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Simferopol, Russian Federation

 

Maria Yu. Morozova – student, S.I. Georgievsky Medical Institute of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7124-8075


Competing Interests:

The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.



References

1. Razumovsky AYu. Pediatric Surgery. 2nd ed. Moscow: "GEOTAR-Media" Publ., 2021. (In Russ.).

2. Kozlov YuA, Krasnov PA, Baradieva PJ, Zvonkov DA, Ochirov ChB. Endosurgical treatment of premature infants with inguinal hernias. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2019;9(2):20–28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30946/2219-4061-2019-9-2-20-28

3. Kozlov YuA, Poloyan SS, Kapuller V, Narkevich AN, Ochirov ChB, Cheremnov VS. Laparoscopic phelps approach in children with inguinal hernia: a retrospective comparative study. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2022;(10):51–57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202210151

4. Wu S, Xing X, He R, Zhao H, Zhong L, Sun J. Comparison of laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure versus open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia. BMC Surg. 2022 Sep 9;22(1):334. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01787-6

5. Barskaya MA. Draft resolution of the Symposium “Surgical pathology of the anterior abdominal wall in children”. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2024;14(3):457–464. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic1834

6. Stolyar AV, Akselrov MA, Malchevskiy VA. Criteria of efficiency of inguinal herniotomy in children under various techniques. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2020;24(4):239–243. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9510-2020-24-4-239-243

7. Suenkova DD, Vinokurova NV. Tactics for inguinal hernias in children. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists and Students, IV Forum of Medical and Pharmaceutical Universities of Russia "For Quality Education". Vol. 2. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Medical University; 2019, pp. 1588–1592. (In Russ.).

8. Gavrilyuk VP, Kostin SV, Donskaya EV, et al. Variants of hernioplasty for inguinal hernias in children. Proceedings of the I All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference «Diagnosis and Treatment Issues of Patients with Ventral Hernias». Kursk: Kursk State Medical University; 2023, pp. 8–10 (In Russ.).

9. Pavlushin PM, Gramzin AV, Krivosheenko NV, Koinov YuY, Chikinev YuV. Video-assisted percutaneous hernia sac suturing: a new technique of inguinal hernia repair in children. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2020;10(4):411– 418. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic704

10. Kozlov YuA, Novozhilov VA, Krasnov PA. A comparative analysis of 569 cases of laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphy in children of the first three 49 months of life. Annals of Surgery (Russia). 2013;(5):49–54. (In Russ.).

11. Momynkulov AO, Shasaitov TA, Kobesh AA, Duisenbay ZS. Common sense in laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias in children. Herald of the National Children's Medical Centre. 2024;14–15. (In Russ.).

12. Gavrilyuk VP, Severinov DA, Kostin SV, Donskaya EV, Zubkova YuA. Simultaneous hernioplasty (PIRS) in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopic Surgery. 2024;30(1):55–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20243001155

13. Teuvov AA, Baziev AM, Tlakadugova MH, Pshukova EM, Sardiyanov AI. Laparoscopic Surgery for Hernias of the Anterior Abdominal Wall. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2021;14(4):288–294. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18499/2070-478X-2021-14-4-288-294

14. Kara YA, Yağız B, Balcı Ö, Karaman A, Özgüner İF, Karaman İ. Comparison of Open Repair and Laparoscopic Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing Method in Repairing Inguinal Hernia in Children. Cureus. 2021;13(4):e14262. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14262

15. Zolotukhin DS, Pavlova OS, Filatov IA. Inguinal ectopia of the testis after hernia repair in children. Continuous Medical Education and Science. 2024;19(3):9–11. (In Russ.).

16. Kılıç S. Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing and classic open approach for inguinal hernia repair in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024;106(8):718–723. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0058

17. Shehata MA. Laparoscopic assisted percutaneous internal ring suturing for inguinal hernia repair in pediatrics. J Ped Endosc Surg. 2020;2(3):145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-020-00067-5

18. Shibuya S, Imaizumi T, Yamada S, Yoshida S, Yamada S, Toba Y, Takahashi T, Miyazaki E. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic percutaneous extracorporeal closure (LPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia by propensity score methods and log-rank test analysis. Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):941–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08354-9

19. Ahmed A, Hashim I, Mehmood F, Haider N, Chattha AA, Ayub A. Outcome of laparoscopic percutaneous extra peritoneal closure versus open repair for paediatric inguinal hernia. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022 Jul-Sep; 34(3):403–406. https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-10505

20. Okunobo T, Nakamura H, Yoshimoto S, Satake R, Shigeta Y, Doi T. The detail profile of cause of recurrences after laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) in children: a systematic review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022;38:359–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-05060-4

21. Chukashov YS, Nazarova IM, Khismatullin RG, Munasipov RN. Results of surgical treatment of inguinal hernias in children. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2022;12S:170–171. (In Russ.).

22. Pavlushin PM, Gramzin AV, Tratonin AA, Krivosheenko NV, Koinov YuYu, Chikinev YuV. Video-assisted isolated percutaneous hernia sac suturing in children with inguinal hernia (VIPS). Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2020;10(2):157–164. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic661

23. Tatarkin EV, Belyaev MK, Taraskin OA, Fedorov KK, Savina SA, Smirnov AS. Laparoscopic herniography in children. Novosti Khirurgii. 2020;28(4). (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2020.4.404

24. Li S, Li M, Wong KK, Liu L, Tam PK. Laparoscopically assisted simple suturing obliteration (LASSO) of the internal ring using an epidural needle: A handy single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(12):1818–1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.027


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Khilko S.S., Morozova M.Yu. Surgical treatment of inguinal hernias in children: review of methods and outcomes. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2025;12(1):115-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2025-12-1-8. EDN: EXGFJT

Views: 227


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-1893 (Online)