COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION FOR X-RAY NEGATIVE STAGE OF KNEE JOINTS OSTEOARTHRITIS
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-1-1
Abstract
Purpose. To compare of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reference in the assessment of pathological changes of the soft tissues at the X-ray negative stage of knee joint osteoarthritis (OA).
Materials and methods. Nineteen patients with X-ray negative stage of knee OA diagnosed in 2015 underwent US and MRI of the knee joints. We estimated the sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values for pathological changes in 7 distinct anatomical areas on US comparing to MRI.
Results. There were no false positive results. The findings of US and MRI coincided for the presence of an excess amount of free fluid in the joint cavity and suprapatellar bursa synovitis and the presence of Baker’s cyst, 15 (79%) and 4 (21%) patients, respectively. More o en, false-negative results on US have been seen in assessing changes in the lateral meniscus and osteophytes: 2 (11%) diagnosed cases vs 15 (79%) for MRI, respectively. The degenerative changes in the medial meniscus were found in 10 (52.6%) on US compared to 15 (79%) for MRI, respectively. Method of US showed the low sensitivity in the detection of early pathological changes of the knee ligaments: sensitivity and predictive value of negative results accounted for the cruciate were 47% and 18%, for collateral ones only 24% and 13%, respectively.
Conclusion. Ultrasound examination is highly effective in the diagnosis of synovitis, free fluid in the joint cavity and suprapatellar bursa and Baker’s cysts in patients with X-ray negative stage of knee OA. It helps to identify the group of patients with the highest risk of progression of OA. The method of ultrasound is significantly inferior to MRI in the diagnosis of early degenerative changes in ligaments, the menisci and cartilage of the joint.
About the Authors
M. V. MakarovaRussian Federation
Maria V. Makarova - MD, PhD, assistant of the department of radiation diagnosis, radiotherapy and oncology.
3 Gaidar str., Arkhangelsk 163000
M. Yu. Valkov
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Valkov - MD, PhD, DSc, professor, head of the department of radiation diagnosis, radiotherapy and oncology.
51 Troitskii pr., Arkhangelsk 163000
References
1. Balabanova R, Dubinina TV, Erdes ShF. Trends in the incidence of rheumatic diseases in the adult population of Russia over 2010– 2014. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54 (3):266–270. DOI: 10.14412/1995–4484–2016–266–270 (In Russian).
2. Luchikhina LV, Karateev DE. New approaches to early diagnosis of arthrosis and prospects for its pathogenetic therapy. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2014; (4):33–38. DOI: 10.14412/2074–2711–2014–4-33–38 (In Russian).
3. Naumov AV, Alekseeva LI, Vertkin AL. Management of patients with osteoarthritis and comorbidity in General practice. Clinical guidelines consensus of experts from the Russian Federation. Мoscow, 2015. (In Russian).
4. Jacobson J. A. Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. Philadelphia Saunders E. 2007; (12):264–333.
5. Eskin NA. Ul’trazvukovaya diagnostika v travmatologii i ortopedii [Ultrasound diagnosis in traumatology and orthopedics]. Мoscow: “Vidar” Publ., 2009. (In Russian).
6. D’iachkova GV, Bakardzhieva AN, D’iachkov KA. Determination of MRT and USE sensitivity and specifi city for examination of patients with the knee element injuries. Genij Ortopedii. 2014; (1):21–4. (In Russian).
7. Ermak EM. Ul’trazvukovaya diagnostika patologii oporno-dvigatel’nogo apparata [Ultrasound diagnosis of pathology of the musculoskeletal system]. Мoscow: “Vidar” Publ., 2015. (In Russian).
8. Makarova MV, Valkov MYu, Valkova LE, Revchuk AS, Agapitov AV, Chernykh IA, et al. Transition Predictors of X-Ray 0 Stage for knee Osteoarthritis Into the 1STStage (Based on the Complex Evaluation of the knee Joint by MRI WORMS). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2017;23 (1):33–44. DOI: 10.21823/2311–2905–2017–23–1-33–44 (In Russian).
9. Pitsyn IA. The application of the principle of feedback of experts to improve the effi ciency of ultrasonic diagnostics of intra-articular injuries of the knee joint. Postgraduate Doctor. 2016; (2.2):284–93. (In Russian).
10. Sencha AN, Belyaev DV, Chizhov PA. Ul’trazvukovaya diagnostika. Kolennyi sustav [Ultrasound diagnosis. The knee joint]. Мoscow: “Vidar” Publ., 2012. (In Russian).
11. Menashe L, Hirko K, Losina E, Kloppenburg M, Zhang W, Li L, Hunter DJ. The diagnostic performance of MRI in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Jan;20 (1):13–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.10.003
12. Kashevarova NG, Alekseeva LI. Risk factors of the knee osteoarthritis progression. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2014;52 (5):553–61. DOI: 10.14412/1995–4484–2014–553–561 (In Russian).
13. Zaitseva EM, Alekseyeva LI. The causes of pain in osteoarthrosis and the factors of disease progression (a review of literature). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2011; (1):50–57. (In Russian).
14. Filatova E, Turovskaya EF, Alekseeva LI, Erdes ShF, Filatova EG. Analysis of the pathogenetic mechanisms of chronic joint pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2014;52 (6):631–5. DOI: 10.14412/1995–4484–2014–631–635 (In Russian).
15. Nudnov NV, Nikolaeva MV. Ultrasound indications of inflammatory process in various segments of knee joints. Journal of RNTSRR. 2013; (13). Available at: http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik/v13/papers/nikolaeva_v13.htm [accessed 16.11.2017] (In Russian).
16. Ermak EM, Kinzerskii AYu. Diagnostics of early stages of destruction of articular cartilage and predatron number of factors. Proceedings of the International conference for the 10th anniversary of the department of ultrasound diagnostics Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education. Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics. 2002;2:297–98. (In Russian).
17. Shmidt G. Ul’trazvukovaya diagnostika [Ultrasonic diagnostics]. Moscow: “Vidar” Publ., 2014. (In Russian).
18. Kirillova ER, Khadyeva EI, Abdrakipov RZ, Afanas’eva MA, Sukhorukova EV, Abdulganieva DI. Assessment of the importance of ultrasound examination in patients with osteoarthritis in clinical practice. Osteoporosis and osteopathy (Osteoporos i osteopatii). 2016; (2):105. (In Russian).
19. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin, DEGUM. Available at:htt p://www.degum.de/index.html
20. Es’kin HA, Atabekova LA, Burkov SG. Ultrasonography of the knee (technique and ultrasound anatomy). SonoAceInternational. 2002; (10):85–92.
21. Bevers K, Bijlsma JW, Vriezekolk JE, Ende CH, Broeder AA. Ultrasonographic features in symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee and relation with pain. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Sep;53 (9):1625–9. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu030.
22. Klementeva VI, Chernysheva TV, Sarycheva YA. Evaluation of cartilage and subchondral bone tissue in patients at early stages of gonarthrosis. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2016;4:36. (In Russian).
23. Oegema T. R., Thompson R. C. Cartilagebone-interface (tidemark). Cartilage changes in osteoarthritis. Brandt.-Indianapolis. 1997; (21):43–52.
24. Blink E. Osnovy MRT: fizika. [Fundamentals of MRI: physics]. St.Petersburg, 2000. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Makarova M.V., Valkov M.Yu. COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION FOR X-RAY NEGATIVE STAGE OF KNEE JOINTS OSTEOARTHRITIS. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2018;5(1):10-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-1-1