Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for the osteoarthritis of knee joint: the radiobiological background, dose distribution analysis
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-3-2
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most frequent rheumatological pathology of the joints. Standard medical treatment does not always allow to stop the pain syndrome. The alternative method of pain treatment causes by OA is orthovoltage X-ray therapy (OVRT). It was used from 1970. The maximum dose by OVRT lies on the skin surface. Based on the modern methods of diagnosis, choosing the appropriate radiation energy, it is possible to reduce the amount of irradiation of the knee joint.
The purpose. Is to present the technique of radiation planning in patients with gonarthritis and compare it with OVRT by dosimetry criteria.
Materials and methods. Comparison of dose distribution plans of the orthovoltage beam was carried out according to the two-dimensional axial plan in the area of the isocenter for the energy of 200 kV from two tangential fields and a megavoltage energy beam of 6 MeV for a three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy using 3-and 6-fields isocentric irradiation techniques. To describe amounts of radiation were applied to the CTV (clinical target volume) and PTV (planning target volume). To estimate the volume distribution of the dose, bones forming the knee joint were contoured separately. The indent on the PTV was 3 mm.
Results. The application of the 6-fields technique allows achieving 95% dose distribution at 93% of the volume, and 90% of the planned dose of 45 SGR covers 97% of the PTV. The average dose on the skin and the neurovascular bundle are of 150 and 240 cGy, respectively. The average radiation dose per course in critical anatomical areas is 280 cGy and 150 cGy. It can be considered that the target coverage for the compared methods is similar as for OVRT, and for 3D conformal radiation therapy plans for dose distribution of the orthogonal beam in the axial plane in comparison with dose distributions for conformal radiation techniques.
Conclusion. The technique of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of the knee joint in OA with progressive pain syndrome can potentially lead to an increase in the analgesic effect due to greater coverage with a dose of bone elements of the joint, which are a potential source of pain. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy megavoltage beam allows reducing the radiation load on the skin in 2.5 times, which can reduce the frequency of delayed adverse effects.
About the Authors
М. V. МаkаrоvаRussian Federation
Maria V. Makarova - MD, PhD, assistant of the department of radiation diagnosis, radiotherapy and oncology.
51 Troitsky ave., Arkhangelsk, 163000
M. Yu. Vаlkov
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Valkov - MD, PhD, DSc, professor, head of the department of radiation diagnosis, radiotherapy and oncology NSMU.
51 Troitsky ave., Arkhangelsk, 163000
D. Yu. Tretjakov
Russian Federation
Dmitrij Yu. Tretjakov - medical physicist.
145/1 Obvodnyi ch., Arkhangelsk, 163045
References
1. Vedenie bol’nykh osteoartritom i komorbidnost’yu v obshchei vrachebnoi praktike. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii konsensusa ekspertov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Management of patients with osteoarthritis and comorbidity in general practice. Clinical recommendations of consensus of experts of the Russian Federation]. Мoscow, 2016. (In Russian).
2. Dudarev AL, Kishkovskii AN. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po luchevoi terapii neopukholevykh zabolevanii [The methodological recommendations for radiotherapy of non-tumor diseases]. Leningrad: “Meditsina” Publ., 1989. (In Russian).
3. Kravtsov AYa, Berke SV, Gromashov EP, Kanterman MA, Silkin SN. Opyt ispol’zovaniya rentgenoterapii pri degenerativno-distroficheskikh zabolevaniyakh kostei, sustavov i vospalitel’nykh zabolevaniyakh khirurgicheskogo profilya. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 1996;4:166. (In Russian).
4. Steffen CC, Muller K, Stellamor J, Zeithofer J. Influence of X-ray treatment on antigen induced experimental arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1982 Oct;41(5):532-7.
5. Zschache H. The results of X-ray therapy in low-doses. Radiobiol Radiother. 1972;13(2):160-4.
6. Kishkovskii AN, Dudarev AL. Luchevaya terapiya neopukholevykh zabolevanii [Radiation therapy of non-tumor diseases]. Moscow: “Meditsina” Publ., 1977. (In Russian).
7. Pan’shin GA, Rybakov YuN. Rentgenoterapiya neopukholevykh zabolevanii. Vestnik RNTsRR MZ RF. 2005;5:386-387. (In Russian).
8. Kishkovskii AN, Aleksandrov SN, Dudarev AL. Radiobiologicheskie aspekty i klinicheskie osnovy luchevoi terapii neopukholevykh zabolevanii [Radiobiological aspects and clinical bases of radiation therapy of non-tumor diseases]. Мoscow, 1981, pp. 7-11. (In Russian).
9. Podlyashchuk EL, Rakhmanin YuA, Stavitskii RV, Sergienko NN. Luchevaya terapiya neopukholevykh zabolevanii [Radiotherapy of non-tumor diseases]. Moscow: “Meditsina” Publ., 1999. (In Russian).
10. Makarova MV, Val’kov MJu, Titova LV, Mardynskij JuS, Zolotkov AG, Antipina IE, Grigor’eva EA, Grzhibovskij AM. Orthovoltage radiotherapy in the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: analysis of effectiveness in comparison with standard methods. Radiology – Practice. 2009;4:50-61. (In Russian).
11. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):13761-6.
12. Prasanna A, Ahmed MM, Mohiuddin M, Coleman CN. Exploiting sensitization windows of opportunity in hyper and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Apr;6(4):287-302. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.01.14
13. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 1997b. Protection from potential exposures: application to selected radiation sources. ICRP Publication 76. Ann. ICRP 27 (2). Available at: https://icru.org/home/reports/prescribing-recording-and-reporting-photon-beam-therapy-report-50. Accessed 01.04.2018
14. Podgorsak EB. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005.
15. McLean AR, Adlen EK, Cardis E, Elliott A, Goodhead DT, Harms-Ringdahl M, et al. A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning the health effects of low-level ionizing radiation. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 13;284(1862). pii: 20171070. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1070
16. Balabanova R, Dubinina TV, Erdes ShF. Trends in the incidence of rheumatic diseases in the adult population of Russia over 2010-2014. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(3):266270. DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2016-266-270 (In Russian).
17. Demograficheskii ezhegodnik Rossii [The Demographic Yearbook of Russia]. Moscow: Rosstat, 2017. (In Russian).
18. Micke O, Micke O, Muecke R; German Cooperative Group on Radiotherapy for Non-malignant Diseases (GCG-BD). Radiotherapy for non-malignant disorders: state of the art and update of the evidence-based practice guidelines. Br J Radiol. 2015 Jul;88(1051):20150080. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150080.
19. Zaitseva EM, Alekseyeva LI. The causes of pain in osteoarthrosis and the factors of disease progression (a review of literature). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2011;1:50-57. (In Russian).
20. Kovrov KN, Makarova MV, Levit ML, Gagarina TYu, Smirnova MN, Val’kov MYu. Morphological analysis of irradiated skin after the low dose x ray therapy of the hip joint osteoarthritis. Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2011;2:72-6. (In Russian).
21. Schaapveld M, Aleman BM, van Eggermond AM, Janus CP, Krol AD, van der Maazen RW, et al. Second primary malignancies lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2499-511. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505949.
Review
For citations:
Маkаrоvа М.V., Vаlkov M.Yu., Tretjakov D.Yu. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for the osteoarthritis of knee joint: the radiobiological background, dose distribution analysis. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2018;5(3):20-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-3-2