IMMEDIATE AND REMOTE RESULTS OF SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS ON THE BREAST
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-2-11
Abstract
Purpose of the study. To assess the women's quality of life when using in the surgical component of the treatment in reconstructive surgeries, and their effect on survival and the period of a relapse-free period.
Patients and methods. Within the period 2012-2017, we analyzed the results of surgical treatment of 192 patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Stages of breast cancer were mainly I-IIB (78%). Histologically, in 89% of cases the tumor was represented by invasive non-specific cancer, in most patients the treatment was complex (84%). With it 192 radical Madden mastectomies with and without the reconstruction of the gland were performed.
Results. Six months after surgery, the patients were surveyed by a psychologist, 127 (66%) patients evaluated cosmetic surgery results as good, 50 (26%) patients — as satisfactory and 15 (8%) — as unsatisfactory. The unsatisfactory results were primarily attributed to the operation after which there were various postoperative complications, in the form of suppuration of postoperative wounds, lymphorrhea, etc. the Type of surgery does not affect the frequency of complications such as infectious complications, early postoperative bleeding, lymphorrhea.
Conclusion. In case of identical early postoperative complications, we obtain better cosmetic long-term results during reconstructive operations. In reconstructive breast surgery, there are several methods of restoring the lost form of the breast, while oncosurgical patients should be treated individually in each case. Technically, the use of expanders and silicone implants is easier and more convenient for the surgeon and the patient. Women with severe ptosis during the reconstructive stage of treatment with allografts are better to carry out a two-stage reconstruction. The presence of the implant does not affect the course of the postoperative period, the prognosis of survival and the period of recurrence-free period.
About the Authors
V. I. YaremaRussian Federation
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor at the department of hospital surgery, faculty of medicine
20/1 Delegatskaya str., Moscow 127473
O. E. Fatuev
Russian Federation
PhD, associate professor, department of hospital surgery, faculty of medicine
20/1 Delegatskaya str., Moscow 127473
N. G. Stepanyants
Russian Federation
MD, PhD,, doctor surgeon-oncologist 1 oncology department
7 Kasatkina str., Moscow 129301
V. V. Safronova
Russian Federation
resident of the department of hospital surgery of the medical faculty
20/1 Delegatskaya str., Moscow 127473
References
1. Корнеев К. В. Современные направления профилактики лимфореи у больных раком молочной железы после радикальных мастэктомий (обзор литературы). Вестник Российского научного центра рентгенорадиологии Минздрава России. 2012;12–2:7./ Korneev KV. Modern tendencies of prevention of lymphorrea after radical mastectomies (the literature review). Vestnik Rossiiskogo nauchnogo tsentra rentgenoradiologii Minzdrava Rossii. 2012;12-2:7. (In Russian).
2. Петрова Г. В., Каприн А. Д., Старинский В. В., Грецова О. П. Заболеваемость злокачественными новообразованиями населения России. Онкология. Журнал им. П. А. Герцена. 2014;2 (5):5–10./ Petrova GV, Kaprin AD, StarinskiT VV, Gretsova OP. Incidence of malignant neoplasms in the population of Russia. Onkologiya. Zhurnal imeni P. A. Gerzena (P. A. Herzen Journal of Oncology). 2014;2 (5):5-10. (In Russian).
3. Иванов В. Г., Волох М. А., Федосов С. И., Ермилова Е. В., Николаев К. С. Возможно ли усовершенствование органосохраняющих операций в хирургическом лечении рака молочной железы? Злокачественные опухоли. 2015;4 (15):28–34. DOI: 10.18027/2224– 5057–2015–1–4–28–34/ Ivanov VG, Volokh MA, Fedosov SI, Ermilova EV, Nikolaev KS. Is it possible to improve breast conserving surgery operations? Malignant Tumoursis. 2015;4 (15):28-34. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2015-1-4-28-34 (In Russian).
4. 4. Agarwal S, Kidwell KM, Farberg A, Kozlow JH, Chung KC, Mo- moh AO. Immediate Reconstruction of the Radiated Breast: Recent Trends Contrary to Traditional Standards. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22 (8):2551-9. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4326-x
5. 5. Azzi AJ, Zammit D, Lessard L. Single-Stage Breast Recon-struction Using an All-In-One Adjustable Expander/Implant. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jan 11;6 (1): e1609. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001609
6. Мехтиева Н. И. Современные тенденции в диагностике и лечении первично операбельного рака молочной железы (обзор литературы). Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы. 2018;14 (4):24–34. DOI: 10.17650/1994–4098–2018–14–4–24– 34/ Mekhtieva NI. The modern trends in diagnosis and treatment of primary operable breast cancer. Women Reproductive System Tumors. 2018;14 (4):24-34. DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2018-14- 4-24-34 (In Russian).
7. Старцева О. И., Мельников Д. В., Иванов С. И., Синельников М. Е., Макаренко Д. А. Применение нестандартных свободных лоскутов передней брюшной стенки при реконструкции молочных желез. Анналы пластической, реконструктивной и эстетической хирургии. 2018;4:127./ Startseva O. I., Mel’nikov D. V., Ivanov S. I., Sinel’nikov M. E., Makarenko D. A. Primenenie nestandartnykh svobodnykh loskutov perednei bryushnoi stenki pri rekonstruktsii molochnykh zhelez. Annaly plasticheskoi, rekonstruktii vnoi i esteticheskoi khirurgii. 2018;4:127. (In Russian).
8. Бленд К. И., Бухлер М. У., Ксендес А., Сарр М. Г., Гарден О. Д., Уонг Д. Хирургическое лечение рака молочной железы и меланомы. М., 2015, с. 180./ Blend KI, Bukhler MU, Ksendes A, Sarr MG, Garden OD, Uong D. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie raka molochnoi zhelezy i melanomy [Surgical treatment of breast cancer and melanoma]. Мoscow, 2015, p. 180. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Yarema V.I., Fatuev O.E., Stepanyants N.G., Safronova V.V. IMMEDIATE AND REMOTE RESULTS OF SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS ON THE BREAST. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2019;6(2):110-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-2-11