Preview

Research and Practical Medicine Journal

Advanced search

Medical and demographic particularities of the contingent of children who underwent ultrasonic examination in multidisciplinary hospital

https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-4-18

Abstract

Ultrasound diagnostics is not just a screening method, but is a tool that plays an important role in making the correct final diagnosis. Due to this, the demand for ultrasonic examinations has increased significantly in recent years.

Purpose of the study. Study of age-related particularities of ultrasonic examinations prescription and passage in multi-discipline hospital by children.

Materials and methods. The analysis of medical records for 1435 patients aged from 0 to 18 years, who underwent ultrasonic examination in multidiscipline hospital, was conducted.

Results. The majority (61.4%) of pediatric patients of hospital received medical services within the framework of high-tech medical care. The significant proportion (32%) were children, who were examined and treated under compulsory health insurance system. Paid medical services accounted for 5.8% and voluntary health insurance — for 0.8%. It was established that newborn children significantly (p<0,05) were more often referred for ultrasonic examinations from pediatric, urological and surgical departments. In the first year of life the ultrasonic examinations were need to patients from pediatric, rheumatology and urological departments. This trend continued in subsequent periods. In the same time, the proportion of pediatric patients from gastroenterological departments increases in primary school age. The conducted analysis also showed that with increasing of the children age referred ultrasonic examinations, the proportion of patients from Nephrology, cardiology, dermatology and rheumatology departments increases while from urolog¬ical and surgical departments — decreases.

Conclusion. The distribution of hospital pediatric patients who underwent ultrasonic examination, by its types, sources of findings and the frequency of re-hospitalizations depends on the age of children.

About the Authors

I. A. Krotov
Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University); National Medical Research Center of Children Health
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Krotov - post-graduate student of the department Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University).

6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117198; 2/1 Lomonosov ave., 119296.



O. E. Konovalov
Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Oleg E. Konovalov - MD, PhD, DSc, professor, professor of department of public health, health care and hygiene Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University).

6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117198.



R. N. Terletskaya
National Medical Research Center of Children Health
Russian Federation

Rimma N. Terletskaya - MD, PhD, DSc, professor, project leader of organizational and analytical department National Medical Research Center of Children Health.

2/1 Lomonosov ave., 119296.



S. N. Gres
Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Sofiya N. Gres - assistant of the department Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University).

6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117198.



References

1. Golovina SM, Yurkin YuYu, Zagoruichenko AA. The development of radiology in the world and in Russia. The Bulletin of the National Research Institute of public health named after N. A. Semashko. 2014; S:78-82. (In Russian).

2. Draijer L, Benninga M, Koot B. Pediatric NAFLD: an overview and recent developments in diagnostics and treatment. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;13(5):447-461. DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1595589

3. Tiurin IE. Radiology in Russian Federation in 2016. Bulletin of X-ray radiography and radiology. 2017; 98(4):219-226. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20862/0042-4676-2017-98-4-219-226

4. Shepin VO. Equipment and activities of ultrasound diagnostics of medical organizations of the Russian Federation. The Bulletin of the National Research Institute of Public Health named after N. A. Semashko. 2014; S:20-26. (In Russian).

5. Coleman JL, Navid F, Furman WL, McCarville MB. Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in the pediatric oncologic population: a a single-institution experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 May; 202(5):966-970. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12010

6. Voblikova VF. Optimization of service activity of ultrasonic diagnostics planning in modern conditions (on the example of Irkutsk region). Dissertation. Moscow, 2015. (In Russian).

7. Robbin ML, Lockhart ME, Weber TM, Tessler FN, Clements MW, Hester FA, et al. Ultrasound quality and efficiency: how to make your practice flourish. J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Jun; 30(6):739-743.

8. Gurevich AI, Zubareva EA, Boguslavskaya MA, Titova EA, Vokueva TI, Kochetkova EA. Ultrasound research methods in Pediatrics. Series «Best Practices of Radiation and Instrumental Diagnostics». 2017; 6:48. (In Russian).

9. Ivanov DO, Polyakova EV, Ryazanov VV, Sadykova GK, Trufanov GE, Yampolskaya EN. Practical ultrasound diagnostics in Pediatrics. A Guide for Doctors. Moscow: «GEOTAR-Media» Publ., 2018, 216 p. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Krotov I.A., Konovalov O.E., Terletskaya R.N., Gres S.N. Medical and demographic particularities of the contingent of children who underwent ultrasonic examination in multidisciplinary hospital. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2019;6(4):174-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-4-18

Views: 800


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-1893 (Online)