Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers E-cadherin and ZEB1 in colorectal cancer
https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2021-8-2-2
Abstract
Purpose of the study. Evaluation of expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers E-cadherin and ZEB1 in patients with stage II-IV colorectal cancer (CRC).
Materials and methods. The study included operational material obtained from 299 patients aged 42–86 years (mean age 64.2±1.7 years) with stage II-IV CRC treated at National Medical Research Centre for Oncology in 2013-2017. Stage II CRC (T3-4 N0 M0 ) was diagnosed in 110 patients, stage III (T1-4 N1-2 M0 ) – in 88 patients, stage IV (T1-4 N0-2 M1 ) – in 101 patients. Polyclonal rabbit antibodies to ZEB1 (Biorbyt Ltd., UK) and mouse monoclonal antibodies to E-cadherin (Diagnostic BioSystems, USA) were used for an IHC analysis. The intensity and degree of tumor cell staining, percentage of stained tumor cells in the sample and the number of patients with positive and negative marker expression were determined. Groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Pearson's chi-square test.
Results. Positive expression of E-cadherin was found in 64.5 % (193 of 299 patients), ZEB1 – in 80.6 % (241 of 299 patients). The number of patients with E-cadherin-positive tumors statistically significantly decreased (χ2 =15.888 at p<0.001) from stage II to stage IV, while for ZEB1, on the contrary, it statistically significantly increased (χ2 =43.912 at p><0.001) from stage II to stage IV. The mean values of expression in positively stained cells were: in stage II – E-cadherin 55.3±6.8 %, ZEB1 43.0±5.9 %; in stage III – E-cadherin 38.4±5.8 %, ZEB1 77.0±5.5 %; in stage IV – E-cadherin 14.7±4.7 %, ZEB1 76.9±3.5 %. Significant differences were observed between the mean values of ZEB1 expression in stages III and IV compared to stage II, as well as between the mean values of E-cadherin expression in stages II and III compared to stage IV (p><0.05). No significant differences were found in the mean values of ZEB1 and E-cadherin expression in stages III and IV, II and III respectively.
Conclusions. The study demonstrated statistically significant relationship between tumor stages and expression of E-cadherin and ZEB1 in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. The loss of the E-cadherin expression in tumor cells of patients from stage II to stage IV and increased expression of ZEB1 in the studied groups were statistically significant (p<0.05).
About the Authors
I. A. NovikovaRussian Federation
Inna A. Novikova – Cand. Sci. (Med.), deputy General Director for Science, SPIN: 4810-2424, AuthorID: 726229, ResearcherID: E-7710-2018, Scopus Author ID: 7005153343
63 14 line str., Rostov-on-Don 344037
Competing Interests:
Аuthors report no conflict of interest.
O. I. Kit
Russian Federation
Oleg I. Kit – corr. member of RAS, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, general director, SPIN: 1728-0329, AuthorID: 343182, ResearcherID: U-2241-2017, Scopus Author ID: 55994103100
63 14 line str., Rostov-on-Don 344037
Competing Interests:
Аuthors report no conflict of interest.
References
1. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2015 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by A.D.Kaprin, V.V.Starinsky, G.V.Petrov. P.A.Herzen Moscow State Research Institute, Moscow: 2017, 250 p. (In Russian).
2. Nepomnyashchaya EM, Kit OI, Nistratova OV, Novikova IA, Nikipelova EA, Bahtin AV, et al. Circulating tumor cells and some morphological and immunohistochemical indicators in colorectal cancer. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2016;(2):140. (In Russian).
3. Patyutko YuI, Kotelnikov AG, Mamontov KG, Ponomarenko AA, Lazarev AF. Immediate results of hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncological Coloproctology. 2014;(1):14–20. (In Russian).
4. Krahmal NV, Zavyalova MV, Denisov EV, Vtorushin SV, Perelmuter VM. Cancer invasion: patterns and mechanisms. Acta Naturae. 2015;2(25):18–31. (In Russian).
5. Pospekhova NI, SHubin VP, Cukanov AS, Kashnikov VN, Frolov SA, Achkasov SI, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer of different stages. Molecular Medicine. 2015;(1):34–38. (In Russian).
6. Sagakyants A.B. United immunological forum: current trends in the development of fundamental and applied oncoimmunology (Novosibirsk, 2019). South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2020;1(2):36–45. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37748/2687-0533-2020-1-2-5
7. Nieto MA, Huang RY-J, Jackson RA, Thiery JP. EMT: 2016. Cell. 2016 Jun 30;166(1):21–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.028
8. Spaderna S, Schmalhofer O, Hlubek F, Berx G, Eger A, Merkel S, et al. A transient, EMT-linked loss of basement membranes indicates metastasis and poor survival in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006 Sep;131(3):830–840. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.06.016
9. Schmalhofer O, Brabletz S, Brabletz T. E-cadherin, beta-catenin, and ZEB1 in malignant progression of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009 Jun;28(1–2):151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-008-9179-y
10. Eger A, Aigner K, Sonderegger S, Dampier B, Oehler S, Schreiber M, et al. DeltaEF1 is a transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin and regulates epithelial plasticity in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005 Mar 31;24(14):2375–2385. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208429
11. Spaderna S, Schmalhofer O, Wahlbuhl M, Dimmler A, Bauer K, Sultan A, et al. The transcriptional repressor ZEB1 promotes metastasis and loss of cell polarity in cancer. Cancer Res. 2008 Jan 15;68(2):537–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5682
12. Liu Y, Zhang N, Wang Y, Xu M, Liu N, Pang X, et al. Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 promotes invasion and bone metastasis of small cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Sci. 2012 Aug;103(8):1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02347.x
13. Kit OI, Shatova YuS, Novikova IA, Vladimirova LYu, Ulyanova EP, Komova EA, et al. P53 and BCL2 expression in different breast cancer subtypes. Basic Research. 2014;(10-1):85–88. (In Russian).
14. Moussa RA, Khalil EZI, Ali AI. Prognostic Role of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Markers “E-Cadherin, β-Catenin, ZEB1, ZEB2 and p63” in Bladder Carcinoma. World J Oncol. 2019 Dec;10(6):199–217. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1234
15. Sistigu A, Di Modugno F, Manic G, Nisticò P. Deciphering the loop of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, inflammatory cytokines and cancer immunoediting. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017 Aug;36:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2017.05.008
16. Sitkovskaya AO, Novikova IA, Zlatnik EYU, Ul'yanova EP, SHul'gina OG, Kolesnikov VE, et al. Correlation analysis of indicators of local immunity and epithelial-mesenchimal transition of patients with colorectal cancer depending on the level of circulating tumor cells. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2020;(5):90. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.30107
17. Xu F, Li S, Zhang J, Wang L, Wu X, Wang J, et al. Cancer Stemness, Immune Cells, and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Cooperatively Predict Prognosis in Colorectal Carcinoma. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):e579–e592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2018.05.007
18. Vlashi E, Pajonk F. Cancer stem cells, cancer cell plasticity and radiation therapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015 Apr;31:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.07.001
19. Chaffer CL, Marjanovic ND, Lee T, Bell G, Kleer CG, Reinhardt F, et al. Poised chromatin at the ZEB1 promoter enables breast cancer cell plasticity and enhances tumorigenicity. Cell. 2013 Jul 3;154(1):61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.005
20. Genna A, Vanwynsberghe AM, Villard AV, Pottier C, Ancel J, Polette M, et al. EMT-Associated Heterogeneity in Circulating Tumor Cells: Sticky Friends on the Road to Metastasis. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 19;12(6):1632. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061632
21. Siebzehnrubl FA, Silver DJ, Tugertimur B, Deleyrolle LP, Siebzehnrubl D, Sarkisian MR, et al. The ZEB1 pathway links glioblastoma initiation, invasion and chemoresistance. EMBO Mol Med. 2013 Aug;5(8):1196–1212. https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201302827
22. Arumugam T, Ramachandran V, Fournier KF, Wang H, Marquis L, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition contributes to drug resistance in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 15;69(14):5820–5828. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2819
23. Miyahara S, Hamasaki M, Hamatake D, Yamashita S-I, Shiraishi T, Iwasaki A, et al. Clinicopathological analysis of pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung: diffuse ZEB1 expression predicts poor survival. Lung Cancer. 2015 Jan;87(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.11.007
24. Paek AR, Lee C-H, You HJ. A role of zinc-finger protein 143 for cancer cell migration and invasion through ZEB1 and E-cadherin in colon cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2014 Feb;53 Suppl 1:E161– E168. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.22083
25. Yao X, Sun S, Zhou X, Zhang Q, Guo W, Zhang L. Clinicopathological significance of ZEB-1 and E-cadherin proteins in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:781–790. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S111920
26. Zhou J, Tao D, Xu Q, Gao Z, Tang D. Expression of E-cadherin and vimentin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(3):3150–3154.
27. Masuda R, Kijima H, Imamura N, Aruga N, Nakazato K, Oiwa K, et al. Laminin-5γ2 chain expression is associated with tumor cell invasiveness and prognosis of lung squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed Res. 2012;33(5):309–317. https://doi.org/10.2220/biomedres.33.309
28. van der Horst G, Bos L, van der Pluijm G. Epithelial plasticity, cancer stem cells, and the tumor-supportive stroma in bladder carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2012 Aug;10(8):995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0274
29. Jang MH, Kim HJ, Kim EJ, Chung YR, Park SY. Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related markers in triple-negative breast cancer: ZEB1 as a potential biomarker for poor clinical outcome. Hum Pathol. 2015 Sep;46(9):1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2015.05.010
Review
For citations:
Novikova I.A., Kit O.I. Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers E-cadherin and ZEB1 in colorectal cancer. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2021;8(2):23-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2021-8-2-2