The effect of conservation in various cryoprotectants on the properties and morphological structure of the umbilical cord arteries

Purpose of the study. The aim of this work was to study the effect of conservation in various cryoprotectants on the biomechanical and morphological properties of the umbilical cord (UCA) arteries.

Materials and methods. The material for this work was 12 umbilical arteries, which were divided into 4 study groups: (1) native UCA – control without freezing; (2) APC frozen in 5 % dextran with the addition of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to 10 % and 7.5 % human serum albumin (HSA); (3) APC frozen in glycerin and (4) UCA frozen in propanediol. For all groups, morphological and biomechanical studies were carried out. The statistical data were processed using the GraphPad Prism 9.2.0 program. Analysis of variance was used to find significant differences.

Results. Freezing with 5 % dextran, 10 % DMSO and 7.5 % human albumin did not lead to significant changes in the morphology of vascular tissue compared to control. The conserved vascular tissue retains a moderate level of type I collagen, regardless of the method of conservation. The presence of statistically significant differences between the control and frozen UCAs was shown for Young's modulus (p < 0.05; 6.9 [6.8; 7.0] for the native artery; 2.3 [2.0; 2.6] for the artery preserved with the use of dextran, DMSO and human albumin; 2.3 [1.4; 3.2] for the artery preserved in glycerin and 0.8 [0.6; 1.0] – in propanediol, respectively).

Conclusion. 1) Freezing and storage of UCA at 5 % dextran, 10 % DMSO and 7.5 % HSA does not lead to a significant change in the morphology of vascular membranes and cell nuclei; 2) The preservation of type I collagen according to the results of IHC is qualitatively reduced from a conditional indicator of +2 to +1 for frozen agroindustrial complexes compared with control ones; 3) Conservation leads to a significant decrease in the modulus of elasticity of the walls of the agroindustrial complex compared with control vessels (p < 0.05).

1. Antonova LV, Nasonova MV, Kudryavtseva YuA, Golovkin AS. Potential for polyhydroxyalkanoates and policaprolactone copolymer use as tissue-engineered scaffolds in cardiovascular surgery. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2012;11(1):128–134. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2012-1-128-134

2. Obiweluozor FO, Emechebe GA, Kim DW, Cho HJ, Park CH, Kim CS, et al. Considerations in the Development of Small-Diameter Vascular Graft as an Alternative for Bypass and Reconstructive Surgeries: A Review. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2020 Oct;11(5):495–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-020-00482-y

3. Mallis P, Kostakis A, Stavropoulos-Giokas C, Michalopoulos E. Future Perspectives in Small-Diameter Vascular Graft Engineering. Bioengineering (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;7(4):160. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040160

4. Roll S, Müller-Nordhorn J, Keil T, Scholz H, Eidt D, Greiner W, et al. Dacron vs. PTFE as bypass materials in peripheral vascular surgery--systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2008 Dec 19;8:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-22

5. Ingle H, Fishwick G, Garnham A, Thompson MM, Bell PRF. Long-term results of endovascular AAA repair using a homemade aortomonoiliac PTFE device. J Endovasc Ther. 2002 Aug;9(4):481–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/152660280200900416

6. Moore MA, Samsell BS, McLean J. Allograft Tissue Safety and Technology. Biologics in Orthopaedic Surgery. 2019:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-55140-3.00005-9

7. Mironov AS, Borovkova NV, Makarov MS, Ponomarev IN, Andreev YuV. Tissue banks. World experience. The history of development and current approaches. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2021;13(1):49–62. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-1-49-62

8. Hidi L, Komorowicz E, Kovács GI, Szeberin Z, Garbaisz D, Nikolova N, et al. Cryopreservation moderates the thrombogenicity of arterial allografts during storage. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0255114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255114

9. Lauk-Dubitsky SE, Astrelina TA, Brumberg VA, Fedyunin AA, Kamyshnikov OYu, Vostrukhin SV, et al. Application evaluation of a polydimethylsiloxane low-viscosity for cryopreservation and radiation sterilization of human cadaveric vascular allografts. Saratov Scientific and Medical Journal. 2016;12(4):662–670. (In Russ.).

10. Špaček M, Měřička P, Janoušek L, Štádler P, Adamec M, Vlachovský R, et al. Current vascular allograft procurement, cryopreservation and transplantation techniques in the Czech Republic. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019 Apr;28(4):529–534. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/90037

11. Heng WL, Madhavan K, Wee P, Seck T, Lim YP, Lim CH. Banking of cryopreserved iliac artery and vein homografts: clinical uses in transplantation. Cell Tissue Bank. 2015 Jun;16(2):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-014-9469-2

12. Arutyunyan I, Fatkhudinov T, Sukhikh G. Umbilical cord tissue cryopreservation: a short review. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018 Sep 15;9(1):236. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0992-0

13. Chatzistamatiou TK, Papassavas AC, Michalopoulos E, Gamaloutsos C, Mallis P, Gontika I, et al. Optimizing isolation culture and freezing methods to preserve Wharton’s jelly’s mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) properties: an MSC banking protocol validation for the Hellenic Cord Blood Bank. Transfusion. 2014 Dec;54(12):3108–3120. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12743

14. Tognetti L, Pianigiani E, Ierardi F, Mariotti G, Perotti R, Lonardo A, et al. Current insights into skin banking: storage, preservation and clinical importance of skin allografts. Journal of Biorepository Science for Applied Medicine. 2017 Jul 1;Volume 5:41–56. https://doi.org/10.2147/BSAM.S115187

15. Bobrova EN, Zinchenko AV, Schetinsky MI. Investigation of Placenta Tissue Saturation with Glycerol and 1,2-Propane Diol. Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine. 2005 Jun 15;15(2):147–152.

16. Camasão DB, Mantovani D. The mechanical characterization of blood vessels and their substitutes in the continuous quest for physiological-relevant performances. A critical review. Mater Today Bio. 2021 Mar 7;10:100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100106