Investigation of the antioxidant status and the number of double-stranded DNA breaks in models of brain tumor lesion by metastases of non-small cell lung cancer in vivo

Purpose of the study. Evaluation of the antioxidant status and DNA damage in tissues of subcutaneous xenografts of non-small cell lung cancer and in peritumoral tissues created using the A549 and H1299 cell cultures.

Materials and methods. The study included 35 intact male Balb/c Nude immunodeficient mice. Cell lines A549 and H1299 were used as transplantable tumor biomaterial. A CDX model was created in accordance with the protocol for supratentorial injections (Ozawa T., James C. D., 2010) adapted for this experiment. Growth rates were controlled and intracranial xenografts were visualized using a high-resolution micro-CT system. The activity of catalase and superoxide dismutase was determined with non-denaturing electrophoresis in 8 % and 12 % polyacrylamide gel. The concentrations of sulfhydryl groups were determined according to Ellman. The DNA damage in lymphocytes was determined by the comet assay.

Results. The experiment resulted in the creation of models of brain tumors characterized by intracranial growth pattern in 100 %. The activity of catalase in the studied lysates of intracranial xenografts, peritumoral tissue and healthy tissues of tumor-bearing animals in all experimental groups increased statistically significantly relative to the healthy tissue of intact animals, and the greatest differences from the control were recorded in the group of animals with implanted H1299 culture at a concentration of 1 × 106 . Superoxide dismutase activity in the studied lysates of intracranial xenografts and peritumoral tissues statistically significantly increased compared to the control sample in all experimental groups. The highest increase in the SOD activity was observed in the tissues of intracranial xenografts with the highest tumor load, which amounted to 28.8 % and 32.9 % of the changes relative to the control sample. A statistically significant increase in the concentration of SH-groups relative to the control sample in tumor tissue lysates was revealed in all experimental groups, and the highest concentration (36.2 ± 0.47) was observed in the group of experimental animals with the highest tumor load. Percentage change in tail moment (DNA damage indicator) in groups O1, O2, O3 and O4 increased statistically significantly compared to the control sample by 55.8 %, 111.8 %, 97.3 % and 170 %, respectively.

Conclusions. The observed increase in the activity of the antioxidant defense system, accumulation of oxidative modifications of proteins, and an increase in DNA double-strand breaks in the tissues of intracranial xenografts of non-small cell lung cancer in vivo suggest that the created models reflect processes similar to those in tumors of human non-small cell lung cancer.

1. Liguori I, Russo G, Curcio F, Bulli G, Aran L, Della-Morte D, et al. Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Apr 26;13:757–772. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s158513

2. Pizzino G, Irrera N, Cucinotta M, Pallio G, Mannino F, Arcoraci V, et al. Oxidative Stress: Harms and Benefits for Human Health. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:8416763. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8416763

3. Hayes JD, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Tew KD. Oxidative Stress in Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020 Aug 10;38(2):167–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.06.001

4. Rezatabar S, Karimian A, Rameshknia V, Parsian H, Majidinia M, Kopi TA, et al. RAS/MAPK signaling functions in oxidative stress, DNA damage response and cancer progression. J Cell Physiol. 2019 Feb 27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28334

5. Brown JL, Lawrence MM, Ahn B, Kneis P, Piekarz KM, Qaisar R, et al. Cancer cachexia in a mouse model of oxidative stress. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Dec;11(6):1688–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12615

6. Zhukova GV, Shikhliarova AI, Sagakyants AB, Protasova TP. About expanding options for using BALB/c nude mice for experimental study of human malignant tumors in vivo. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2020;1(2):28–35. https://doi.org/10.37748/2687-0533-2020-1-2-4

7. Ozawa T, James CD. Establishing intracranial brain tumor xenografts with subsequent analysis of tumor growth and response to therapy using bioluminescence imaging. J Vis Exp. 2010 Jul 13;(41):1986. https://doi.org/10.3791/1986

8. Kit OI, Frantsiyants EM, Nikipelova EA, Komarova EF, Kozlova LS, Tavaryan IS, et al. Changes in markers of proliferation, neoangiogenesis and plasminogen activation system in rectal cancer tissue. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2015;(2(114)):40–45.

9. Ebrahimi S, Soltani A, Hashemy SI. Oxidative stress in cervical cancer pathogenesis and resistance to therapy. J Cell Biochem. 2018 Nov 13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.28007

10. Srinivas US, Tan BWQ, Vellayappan BA, Jeyasekharan AD. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol. 2019 Jul;25:101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.101084

11. Li X, Hou Y, Zhao J, Li J, Wang S, Fang J. Combination of chemotherapy and oxidative stress to enhance cancer cell apoptosis. Chem Sci. 2020 Feb 25;11(12):3215–3222. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9sc05997k

12. Machado KL, Marinello PC, Silva TNX, Silva CFN, Luiz RC, Cecchini R, Cecchini AL. Oxidative Stress in Caffeine Action on the Proliferation and Death of Human Breast Cancer Cells MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. Nutr Cancer. 2021;73(8):1378–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2020.1795693

13. Pogorelova YuA, Frantziyantz EM, Balyazin IV, Komarova EF, Сheryarina ND. A free radical processes condition in a perifocal zone tissue of the brain tumours and cancer metastases of various localization in the brain. Bulletin of Higher Education Institutes. North Caucasus Region. Natural Sciences. 2011;(3(163)):112–116. (In Russ.).

14. Tushinskaya LA, Shchedrina AV, Murach EI, Medyanik IA. The role of reactive oxygen species in the signaling pathways of cell proliferation and apoptosis in brain tumors. Proceedings of abstracts of the V All-Russian Conference of Young Scientists and Students with international participation "VolgaMedScience". 2019, 522–523 p. (In Russ.).