Preview

Research and Practical Medicine Journal

Advanced search

Possibilities of regulating the reaction of tissues of the implantation area with pyrimidine preparations after prosthetic repair of the hernia ring in the experiment

https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2022-9-4-8

Abstract

Purpose of the study. Study of the possibilities of pharmacological regulation of local and systemic inflammatory response, stimulation of reparative regeneration in prosthetic repair of abdominal wall hernias.

Materials and methods. The experiment was carried out on 92 rats of both sexes of a pure line, divided into 4 groups. Group I (control) received only 1 ml of 0.9 % sodium chloride solution. Group II – hydroxyethyldimethyldihydropyrimidine 21 mg/day. Group III – potassium orotate 10.5 mg/day. Group IV – methyluracil 14 mg/day. Under anesthesia a mesh implant 4 × 2 cm was placed in the layer between the hypodermis and the superficial fascia. Animals were withdrawn from the experiment on days 5 (n = 52) and 14 days (n = 40). The site of implantation for histomorphometric studies captured the dermis, hypodermis, implant layer, fascia, and muscle. The preparation and staining of the preparations were carried out with hematoxylin-eosin and by Mallory.

Results. 1. On the 5th day after the operation group II (hydroxyethyldimethyldihydropyrimidine) was characterized by pronounced neovasculogenesis (p = 0.002, U-test) and more active processes of formation and maturation of connective tissue (p = 0.024, U-test) with a low immune response to a foreign body (p = 0.044, U- test). III (potassium orotate) and IV groups (methyluracil) were characterized by a pronounced decrease in the inflammatory response with a simultaneous increase in tissue edema (p < 0.001, U-test), slowing down the formation and maturation of connective tissue (p = 0.016, U-test). 2. On the 14th day after the operation, group II (hydroxyethyldimethyldihydropyrimidine) was characterized an increase in the area of neovasculogenesis by 208.0 % (p < 0.001, U -criterion), a decrease in the volume of fluid accumulations by 63.4 % (p < 0.001, U-criterion), an increase in the processes of formation and maturation of connective tissue, mainly due to an increase in the number of fibrocytes by 333.3 % (p < 0.001, U-criterion). The parameters of the immune response to a foreign body had significant differences (p < 0.001, U-test).

Conclusion. The use of potassium orotate and methyluracil reduces the inflammatory response in the tissues of the implantation area, however, it is associated with the appearance of liquid components and with a decrease in the formation of connective tissue cells. The use of hydroxyethyldimethyldihydropyrimidine is devoid of the above disadvantages, it is characterized by the predominance of regeneration and neovasculogenesis processes, which allows it to be used as a pharmacological support drug for prosthetic hernioplasty.

About the Authors

E. E. Lukoyanychev
City Clinical Hospital No. 7 named after E. L. Berezova
Russian Federation

Egor E. Lukoyanychev – Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor, consultant

Nizhny Novgorod

SPIN: 7896-4581,

AuthorID: 625639



S. G. Izmailov
City Clinical Hospital No. 7 named after E. L. Berezova

Sergej G. Izmajlov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, professor-consultant

Nizhny Novgorod

SPIN: 3984-2070,

AuthorID: 755363



D. A. Evsyukov
City Clinical Hospital No. 7 named after E. L. Berezova

Dmitriy A. Evsyukov – surgeon

66A Oktyabrskaya revolyutsii str., Nizhny Novgorod 127018

SPIN: 3082-9288,

AuthorID: 1122638



V. O. Nikolskij
City Clinical Hospital No. 7 named after E. L. Berezova

Victor O. Nikolskij – Dr. Sci. (Med.), consulting-professor

Nizhny Novgorod

SPIN: 8734-7578,

AuthorID: 595204



A. A. Mironov
Privolga Research Medical University; Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (UNN); Almazov National Medical Research Center

Andrey A. Mironov – Cand. Sci. (Biol.), associate professor, department of neurotechnology, IBM, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (UNN); associate professor, department of normal physiology named after N. Yu. Belenkov Privolga Research Medical University; head of the support group of the testing complex for preclinical and translational studies, Almazov National Medical Research Center

Nizhny Novgorod,

St. Petersburg

SPIN: 1635-3308,

AuthorID: 139658,

ResearcherID: E-3309-2014,

Scopus Author ID: 55561808200



A. V. Panyushkin
City Clinical Hospital No. 7 named after E. L. Berezova

Aleksey V. Panyushkin – chief of the surgical department

Nizhny Novgorod



References

1. Riabkov MG, Izmailov SG, Lukoianychev EE, Sabauri RV, Orlinskaia NIu. Intraabdominal hypertension in patients with acute conditions of abdominal cavity. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2013;3:48–54. (In Russ.).

2. Timerbulatov MV, Timerbulatov ShV, Gataullina EZ, Valitova ER. Postoperative ventral hernias: current state of the problem. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2013;8(5):101–107. (In Russ.).

3. Ermolov AS, Blagovestnov DA, Alekseev AK, Upyrev AV, Yartsev PA, Shlyakhovskiy IA, et al. Optimized approach to the surgical treatment of patients with large and giant postoperative ventral hernia. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;9:38–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201909138

4. Tarasova NK, Dynkov SM, Pozdeev VN, Teterin AYu, Osmanova GSh. Analysis of the causes of recurrent postoperative ventral hernias. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;10:36–42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201910136

5. Vlasov АV, Kukosh МV. The Problem of Wound Complications in Abdominal Wall Endoprosthesis Replacement in Ventral Hernias. Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2013;5(2):116–124. (In Russ.).

6. Belokonev VI, Ponomareva JV, Pushkin SY, Melentieva ON, Gulyaev MG. Potential predictors and morphological aspects of seroma development after plastic surgery of the anterior abdominal wall hernia. Novosti Khirurgii. 2014;22(6):665–670. (In Russ.).

7. Mikhin IV, Kukhtenko YuV, Panchishkin AS. Large and giant postoperative ventral hernias: possibilities of surgical treatment (literature review). Journal of VolgSMU. 2014;2(50):8–16. (In Russ.).

8. Brooks DC. Clinical features, diagnosis, and prevention of incisional hernias. UpToDate. 2018, 1–16 p. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-features-diagnosis-and-prevention-of-incisional-hernias/print, Accessed: 01.11.2022.

9. Beschastnov VV, Izmaylov SG, Bagryantsev MV, Orlinskaya NY, Lukoyanychev EE, Mironov AA. Activity of reparative regenerative processes in terms of local periwound circulatory hypoxia. Novosti Khirurgii. 2015;23(6):612–618. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2015.6.612

10. Mathes SJ, Steinwald PM, Foster RD, Hoffman WY, Anthony JP. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparison of flap and mesh closure. Ann Surg. 2000 Oct;232(4):586–596. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200010000-00014

11. Parakhonsky AP, Tsyganok SS. Immunocytochemistry of leukocytes in inflammation. Fundamental Research. 2004;(1):74–75. (In Russ.).

12. Kalinina NM, Sosyukin AE, Vologzhanin DA, Kuzin AA, Knjazev PS. Trauma: inflammation and immunity. Cytokines and Inflammation. 2005;4(1):28–35. (In Russ.).

13. Magomedov MM, Magomedbekov RE, Ismailov GM. Systemic inflammatory response in alloplastic methods of treatment of inguinal hernias. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2017;(2):48–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/article_59099e6cbbb6f5.58108559

14. Sarbaeva NN, Ponomareva JV, Milyakova MN. Macrophages: diversity of phenotypes and functions, interaction with foreign materials. Genes and Cells. 2016;11(1):9–17. (In Russ.).

15. Kukosh MV, Izmailov SG, Lukoyanichev EE, Evsyukov DA. New technologies in the prevention of wound infection during prosthetic repair. Almanac of the Institute of Surgery. A.V. Vishnevsky. 2020;(1):375–376. (In Russ.). Available at: http://book.surgeons.ru/components/com_jshopping/files/demo_products/Thesis_2020_part1.pdf, Accessed: 06.11.2022.

16. Lukoyanychev EE, Izmaylov SG, Mironov AA, Izmaylov AG, Bodrov AA, Bogdanov SN, et al. Pharmacological stimulation of mesh implant engraftment after ventral hernia repair. Kazan Medical Journal. 2021;102(1):6–11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/kmj2021-6


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Lukoyanychev E.E., Izmailov S.G., Evsyukov D.A., Nikolskij V.O., Mironov A.A., Panyushkin A.V. Possibilities of regulating the reaction of tissues of the implantation area with pyrimidine preparations after prosthetic repair of the hernia ring in the experiment. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2022;9(4):83-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2022-9-4-8

Views: 411


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-1893 (Online)