Combined treatment of high and very high risk prostate cancer: results of neoadjuvant treatment
https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2023-10-2-3
EDN: OOORZC
Abstract
Purpose of the study. Assessment of safety and short‑term effectiveness of high and very high‑risk prostate cancer neoadjuvant chemo‑ hormonal treatment without distant metastases.
Patients and methods. Combined hormone chemo‑ radiation treatment of 33 patients with prostate cancer of high and very high risk of progression without distant metastases was performed. Metastases to regional lymph nodes were found in 9 patients according to the examination data (MRI, MSCT), no metastases were detected in 24 patients. All patients underwent combined chemohormonal therapy in the amount of 4 courses of docetaxel intravenously at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks as the first stage of treatment. in combination with androgen deprivation therapy with agonists or antagonists of GnRH before performing radical radiation therapy (combined or remote). All patients underwent neoadjuvant hormone therapy: 16 patients – with the use of GnRH antagonists (Degarelix), 17 – with the use of GnRH agonists (Gozerelin/Leuprorelin/Triptorelin). The toxicity of the presented treatment regimen and its immediate effectiveness – the effect on the level of prostate‑s pecific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, and the quality of urination – were evaluated.
Results. Treatment regimen was highly effective concerning PSA decrease (from initial median level 79,67 ng/ml to 1,45 ng/ml after neoadjuvant treatment), all subjects responded well, no non‑responders observed. Median prostate volume decreased from 44 cm3 to 25 cm3 after treatment, which guaranteed availability and safety of further radical radiation treatment. Urinary function was restored in all subject with initial urinary retention.
Conclusion. Neoadjuvant chemo‑h ormonal treatment was highly effective in PSA level, prostate volume decrease and functional results improvement which secured further radical radiation treatment in one of its types. Toxicity was acceptable, adverse events did not exceed grade II in most cases and did not lead to treatment discontinuation in any cases, while quality of life remained high enough.
About the Authors
A. V. TroyanovRussian Federation
Alexey V. Troyanov – MD, oncologist of the Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Urological Diseases with the Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy Group, A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7025-5365, SPIN: 4504-1800, AuthorID: 905540, Scopus Author ID: 57193874423
Competing Interests:
author declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
V. A. Biryukov
Russian Federation
Vitaliy A. Biryukov – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Senior Researcher of the Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Urological Diseases with the Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy Group, A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3385-3603, SPIN: 3167-0076, AuthorID: 746560, Scopus Author ID: 56699659300
Competing Interests:
author declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
I. V. Zaborsky
Russian Federation
Ivan N. Zaborsky – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Senior Researcher of the Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Urological Diseases with the Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy Group, A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-8268, SPIN: 2445-5967, AuthorID: 904809, Scopus Author ID: 57208279369
Competing Interests:
author declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
V. S. Chaykov
Russian Federation
Vladimir S. Chaykov – Researcher at the Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Urological Diseases with the Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy Group, A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-4937, SPIN: 2612-7198, AuthorID: 777828, Scopus Author ID: 57209848725
Competing Interests:
author declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
I. O. Dementev
Russian Federation
Ivan O. Dementev – Junior Researcher at the Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Urological Diseases with the Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy Group, A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2780-9822, SPIN: 3611-1085, AuthorID: 1120221
Competing Interests:
author declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
E. O. Shchukina
Russian Federation
Elizaveta O. Shchukina – MD, oncologist, PhD student of the Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Urological Diseases with the Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy Group, A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5431-8696, SPIN: 1663-1952, AuthorID: 1166889, Scopus Author ID: 57224006812
Competing Interests:
author declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
O. B. Karyakin
Oleg B. Karyakin – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Urological Diseases with the Prostate Cancer Brachytherapy Group, A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russian Federation
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-2840, SPIN: 1486-9379, AuthorID: 339511, Scopus Author ID: 6506147764
Competing Interests:
author declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
References
1. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2020 (morbidity and mortality). Edited by Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova AO. Мoscow: P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2021, 252 p. (In Russ.). Available at: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/zis-2020-elektronnaya-versiya.pdf. Accessed: 10.05.2023.
2. The state of oncological care for the Russian population in 2020. Edited by Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova AO. Мoscow: P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2021, 239 p. (In Russ.). Available at: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/pomoshh-2020-el.-versiya.pdf. Accessed: 10.05.2023.
3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate Cancer version 4.2022. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. Accessed: 10.05.2023.
4. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2022. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer. Accessed: 10.05.2023.
5. Johnstone PA, Ward KC, Goodman M, Assikis V, Petros JA. Radical prostatectomy for clinical T4 prostate cancer. Cancer. 2006;106(12):2603–2609. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21926
6. Stranne J, Brasso K, Brennhovd B, Johansson E, Jäderling F, Kouri M, et al. SPCG-15: a prospective randomized study comparing primary radical prostatectomy and primary radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer. Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;52(5-6):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2018.1520295
7. Dumont C, Baciarello G, Bosset PO, Lavaud P, Colomba E, Massard C, et al. Long-term Castration-related Outcomes in Patients With High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Docetaxel and Estramustine in the UNICANCER GETUG-12 Trial. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Dec;18(6):444–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.017
8. Rosenthal SA, Hu C, Sartor O, Gomella LG, Amin MB, Purdy J, et al. Effect of Chemotherapy With Docetaxel With Androgen Suppression and Radiotherapy for Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer: The Randomized Phase III NRG Oncology RTOG 0521 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.18.02158 . Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun 10;39(17):1949.
9. Thalgott M, Horn T, Heck MM, Maurer T, Eiber M, Retz M, et al. Long-term results of a phase II study with neoadjuvant docetaxel chemotherapy and complete androgen blockade in locally advanced and high-risk prostate cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2014 Mar 5;7:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-7-20
10. Dreicer R, Magi-Galluzzi C, Zhou M, Rothaermel J, Reuther A, Ulchaker J, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant docetaxel before radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer. Urology. 2004 Jun;63(6):1138–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.040
11. Magi-Galluzzi C, Zhou M, Reuther AM, Dreicer R, Klein EA. Neoadjuvant docetaxel treatment for locally advanced prostate cancer: a clinicopathologic study. Cancer. 2007 Sep 15;110(6):1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22897
12. Vuky J, Porter C, Isacson C, Vaughan M, Kozlowski P, Picozzi V, Corman J. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant docetaxel and gefitinib followed by radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk, locally advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2009 Feb 15;115(4):784–791. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24092
13. Zhao B, Yerram NK, Gao T, Dreicer R, Klein EA. Long-term survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer managed with neoadjuvant docetaxel and radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2015 Apr;33(4):164.e19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.01.001
14. Kaprin AD, Troyanov AV, Ivanov SA, Karyakin OV. Combined chemohormonalradiation treatment of highand very-high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Urology. 2017;13(1):101–111. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2017-13-1-101-111
15. Troaynov AV, Karyakin OB, Biryukov VA, Gumenetskaya YV. Method for complex hormone-chemoradiation treatment of localized or locally advanced prostate cancer of high and very high risk of progressing. Patent for invention RU 2716942 C2, 17.03.2020. Application № 2019127438 - 30.08.2019. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42588867
Review
For citations:
Troyanov A.V., Biryukov V.A., Zaborsky I.V., Chaykov V.S., Dementev I.O., Shchukina E.O., Karyakin O.B. Combined treatment of high and very high risk prostate cancer: results of neoadjuvant treatment. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2023;10(2):31-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2023-10-2-3. EDN: OOORZC