Preview

Research and Practical Medicine Journal

Advanced search

CORONET online risk assessment tool and Charlson comorbidity index in predicting fatalities in cancer patients with COVID-19

https://doi.org/10.17709/10.17709/2410-1893-2023-10-4-4

EDN: RGFRTR

Abstract

Purpose of the study. Сomparing and evaluating the prognostic potential of the CORONET online risk assessment tool and the Charlson Comorbidity Index in predicting mortality in cancer patients with COVID-19.

Materials and methods. The results are drawn from the data of 168 case histories of cancer patients who were undergoing inpatient treatment for COVID-19 at the University Clinical Hospitals of Sechenov University between March 2020 and February 2022. The study was conducted as part of the program of the world-class research center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare” of Sechenov University, with participation in the ESMO-CoCARE Registry project. Patients with a history of solid or hematologic malignancies were included in the study; their treatment period before the study was 5 years or less. The age ranged from 37 to 100 years, the median age was 69 years. The CORONET online risk assessment tool and the Charlson comorbidity index were used to objectify the severity of multimorbidity status and prognosis of fatal outcomes in cancer patients with COVID-19.

Results. It was demonstrated that statistically significant effects on the prognosis of mortality in patients with cancer were: age, percentage of saturation on admission, treatment in intensive care units (ICU), National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) distress syndrome severity scale score, computed tomography (CT) assessment of disease course severity, decreased blood albumin and platelet counts, and increased blood neutrophil counts in both categorical and immediate indicator value formats. In addition, it was determined that as the number of comorbidities increased, the probability of mortality increased significantly, odds ratio (OR) = 2.162 (CI 95 % 1.016–4.600; p = 0.045). The CORONET calculator score yields one of the highest OR values among all established statistically significant predictors, 20.410 (CI 95 % 4.894–85.113; p < 0.001). For oncopathology in COVID-19 patients, the Charlson index score shows statistical significance as a predictor of mortality, OR =1.396 (CI 9 5 % 1.105–1.765; p = 0.005).

Conclusion. The obtained advantages in using the CORONET online decision support tool over the Charlson comorbidity index in predicting mortality in cancer patients with COVID-19 are recognized as convincing.

About the Authors

A. S. Rusanov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Моscow, Russian Federation

 

Aleksandr S. Rusanov – Junior Research Assistant, Postgraduate Student of the Institute of Personalized Oncology Center «Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare», Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Моscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0658-9130, SPIN: 4785-2353, AuthorID: 1128527, Scopus Author ID: 57244423900, ResearcherID: AEH-8251-2022

 


Competing Interests:

Author state that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.



M. I. Sekacheva
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Моscow, Russian Federation

 

Marina I. Sekacheva – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Director of the Institute of Personalized Oncology Center «Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthсare», Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Моscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0015-7094, SPIN: 4801-3742, AuthorID: 631044, Scopus Author ID: 24342526600, ResearcherID: AAP-7426-2020


Competing Interests:

Author state that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.



A. A. Tyazhelnikov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Моscow, Russian Federation

 

Andrey A. Tyazhelnikov – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Public Health and Health Care named after Academician Y. P. Lisitsyn, Faculty of Pediatrics of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Моscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-0623, SPIN: 4251-4544, AuthorID: 456585, Scopus Author ID: 57200694228, ResearcherID: ACK-4489-2022


Competing Interests:

Author state that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.



References

1. Popova KN, Zhukov АА, Zykina IL, Troschanskiy DV, Tyurin IN, Protsenko DN. NEWS2 score in the practice of infectious diseases hospital in COVID-19 patients. Implementation and results. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2021;18(1):7–16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2021-18-1-7-16

2. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report–46. [Internet] Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200306-sitrep-46-covid-19.pdf Accessed 20.06.2023

3. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. https://doi.org: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

4. Mareev VYu, Begrambekova YuL, Mareev YuV. How to evaluate the results of treatment of patients with new coronavirus infection (COVID-19)? Clinical Assessment Scale (CAS- COVID). Kardiologiia. 2020;11:35–41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18087/ cardio.2020.11.n1439

5. Bakin EA, Stanevich OV, Chmelevsky MP, Belash VA, Belash AA, Savateeva GA, et al. A Novel Approach for COVID-19 Patient Condition Tracking: From Instant Prediction to Regular Monitoring. Front. Med. 2021;8:744652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.744652

6. Vechorko VI, Averkov OV, Grishin DV, Zimin AA. NEWS2, 4C Mortality Score, COVID-GRAM, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Quick scales as outcomes assessment tools for severe COVID-19 (pilot retrospective cohort study). Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2022;21(3):3103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2022-3103

7. Svarovskaya AV, Shabelsky АO, Levshin AV. Charlson comorbidity index in predicting deaths in COVID-19 patients. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;27(3):4711. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4711

8. Liang W, Liang H, Ou L, Chen B, Chen A, Li C, et al. China Medical Treatment Expert Group for COVID-19. Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score to Predict the Occurrence of Critical Illness in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1081-1089. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033

9. Dettorre GM, Dolly S, Loizidou A, Chester J, Jackson A, Mukherjee U, et al. Systemic pro-inflammatory response identifies patients with cancer with adverse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection: the OnCovid Inflammatory Score. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 2021;9:e002277. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-002277

10. Castelo-Branco L, Tsourti Z, Gennatas S, Rogado J, Sekacheva M, Viñal D, et al. COVID-19 in patients with cancer: first report of the ESMO international, registry-based, cohort study (ESMO-CoCARE). ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100499

11. Lee RJ, Wysocki O, Zhou C, Shotton R, Tivey A, Lever L, et al. Establishment of CORONET, COVID-19 Risk in Oncology Evaluation Tool, to Identify Patients With Cancer at Low Versus High Risk of Severe Complications of COVID-19 Disease On Presentation to Hospital. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 May;6: e2100177. https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.21.00177

12. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2. [Internet] Available at: https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/10083/national-early-warning-score-news-2 Accessed 20.06.2023

13. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) [Internet] Available at: https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/3917/charlson-comorbidity-index-cci Accessed 21.06.2023

14. COVID-19 Risk in Oncology Evaluation Tool. [Internet] Available at: https://coronet.manchester.ac.uk/ Accessed 23.06.2023

15. Liao X, Wang B, Kang Y. Novel coronavirus infection during the 2019-2020 epidemic: preparing intensive care units- the experience in Sichuan Province, China. Intensive Care Medicine. 2020;46(2):357-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020- 05954-2

16. Buziashvili JI, Stilidi IS, Asymbekova EU, Mackeplishvili ST, Tugeeva EF, Ahmedyarova NK, et al. Comprehensive assessment of quality of life in patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Medical alphabet. 2022;(13):26-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2022-13-26-31

17. Zaki N, Alashwal H, Ibrahim S. Association of hypertension, diabetes, stroke, cancer, kidneydisease, andhigh-cholesterol with COVID-19 diseases everity and fatality: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):1133-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.07.005

18. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, Bacon S, Bates C, Morton CE, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):430-436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

19. Grivas P, Khaki AR, Wise-Draper TM, French B, Hennessy C, Hsu CY, et al. Association of clinical factors and recent anticancer therapy with COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer: a report from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium. Ann Oncol. 2021 Jun;32(6):787-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.024

20. Knight SR, Ho A, Pius R, Buchan I, Carson G, Drake TM, et al. Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score BMJ 2020;370:m3339 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3339

21. Giannakoulis VG, Papoutsi E, Siempos II. Effect of Cancer on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis of Patient Data. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jun;6:799-808. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00225

22. Soh CH, Ul Hassan SW, Sacre J, Maier AB. Morbidity Measures Predicting Mortality in Inpatients: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(4):462-468.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.001

23. Huntley AL, Johnson R, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Salisbury C. Measures of multimorbidity and morbidity burden for use in primary care and community settings: a systematic review and guide. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(2):134-141. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1363

24. Lee ES, Koh HL, Ho EQ, Teo SH, Wong FY, Ryan BL, et al. Systematic review on the instruments used for measuring the association of the level of multimorbidity and clinically important outcomes. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5):e041219. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041219

25. Oemrawsingh A, Swami N, Valderas JM, Hazelzet JA, Pusic AL, Gliklich RE, et al. Patient-Reported Morbidity Instruments: A Systematic Review. Value Health. 2020 Jun;23(6):791-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.006.


Review

For citations:


Rusanov A.S., Sekacheva M.I., Tyazhelnikov A.A. CORONET online risk assessment tool and Charlson comorbidity index in predicting fatalities in cancer patients with COVID-19. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2023;10(4):48-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/10.17709/2410-1893-2023-10-4-4. EDN: RGFRTR

Views: 365


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-1893 (Online)