CALCULATION STUDIES OF SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE ABSORBED DOSE RATE FOR VARIOUS SEEDS
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-4-41-49
Abstract
Purpose. Conducting computational studies of dosimetric characteristics of microsources with the radionuclide I‑125, pilot production of which is established in the research and production complex of isotope and radiopharmaceuticals, JSC “State Scientific Centre of the Russian Federation — Institute for Physics and Power Engineering named after A. I. Leypunsky” (SSC RF IPPE). Sources of production IPPE are similar to the model 6711 of the company Nicomed Amersham, dosimetric characteristics of which are standardized in accordance with the TG43 AAPM formalism.
Materials and methods. Microsourse «SEED No. 6711» (model of the company Nicomed Amersham) is hermetically sealed in a titanium capsule silver rod covered with a thin layer of radioactive I‑125. The half-life of iodine‑125 is 59,43 days. In the process of decay of I‑125 is converted into the Te‑125.
Calculation of parameters of microsources and their comparison with the standard model 6711 is carried out with use of the computer code MCNP.
Results. The method of calculation of the basic dosimetric characteristics of the microsourse SSC RF-IPPE in accordance with the TG43 formalism is developed. A comparative analysis of experimental data and calculated results by MCNP code, which allowed to identify possible reasons for differences, is performed. The estimated dose characteristics and recommended standard data for dose characteristics of micro «SEED No. 6711» are compared.
Conclusions. There are two possible reasons for the differences between experimental and calculated results. The first one may be the roughness of the surface of a silver rod or diffusion of radioactive iodine in silver. The second reason might be the difference of the cross sections of the characteristic radiation of silver used in MCNP code. In the comparison of calculated dose characteristics and recommended standard the role of the application activity is very important. In compliance with the standard conditions on the composition of the environment, water phantom and air with 40% humidity, the results obtained are outside the acceptable difference of 3% from the recommended data. While the variation of only the thickness of the deposition of radioactive material in the 0–10 mkm change dosimetric characteristics in the range of 15–20%.
About the Authors
N. A. NerozinRussian Federation
PhD of technical sciences, Deputy director of Department of physical and chemical technologies — Head of Research and produc on complex of isotopes and radiopharmaceu cals JSC “State Scientific Centre of the Russian Federation — Institute for Physics and Power Engineering named after A. I. Leypunsky”
A. P. Pyshko
Russian Federation
PhD of physics and mathematics, Head of Division of engineering and physical studies of fundamental and applied problems of special nuclear power facilities, Department of space power systems JSC “State Scientific Centre of the Russian Federation — Institute for Physics and Power Engineering named after A. I. Leypunsky”
V. V. Shapovalov
Russian Federation
PhD of chemistry, Chief Technologist of Research and production complex of isotopes and radiopharmaceuticals, Department of physical and chemical technologies JSC “State Scientific Centre of the Russian Federation — Institute for Physics and Power Engineering named after A. I. Leypunsky”
References
1. Williamson J. F. Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report. A Revised AAPM Protocol for Interstitial Brachytherapy Dose Calculations. Overview. AAPM — 45th annual meeting. 2003.
2. Rivard M. J., Coursey B. M., DeWerd L. A., Hanson W. F., Saiful Huq M., Ibbott G. S., Mitch M. G., Nath R., Williamson J. F. Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys. 2004; 31 (3): 633–674.
3. Nath R., Anderson L. L., Luxton G., Weaver K. A., Williamson J. F., Meigooni A. S. Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Med Phys. 1995; 22 (2): 209–233.
4. Briesmeister J. F. (Ed). MCNP4A — A General Monte Carlo N — Particle Transport code. Los Alamos National Laboratory report. LA-12625-M; 1993.
5. Forrest B. B., Booth T. E., et al. MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N — Particle Transport code, Version 5, Overview and Theory, Volume I/LA-UR-03–1987, LANL, 2003.
6. Briesmeister J. F., Brown J. S., et al. MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N — Particle Transport code, Version 5, User’s Guide, Volume II, LA-CP-03–0245, LANL, 2003.
7. Hodgdon A. D. A Variance Reduction Management Algorithm for MCNP. Trans Ann Nucl Soc. 2002; 28: 373.
8. Seltzer S. M., Lamperti P. J., Loevinger R., Mitch M. G., Weaver J. T., Coursey B. M. New National Air-Kerma-Strength Standards for 125I and 103Pd Brachytherapy Seeds. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2003; 108 (5): 337–358.
Review
For citations:
Nerozin N.A., Pyshko A.P., Shapovalov V.V. CALCULATION STUDIES OF SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE ABSORBED DOSE RATE FOR VARIOUS SEEDS. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2015;2(4):41-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-4-41-49