Preview

Research and Practical Medicine Journal

Advanced search

Results of targeted lymphadenectomy in patients with breast cancer cT1-3N1M0 after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2025-12-1-1

EDN: URZOFV

Abstract

Purpose of the study. To evaluate the results of targeted lymphadenectomy (TLAE) in patients with breast cancer (BC) cT1–3N1M0 after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST).

Patients and methods. The study represents a prospective analysis of 83 patients diagnosed with breast cancer in stage T1–3N1M0 who were treated in the Department of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery of the breast and skin at the P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute (Moscow, Russian Federation). The patients were divided into two groups: in the main group 1 (n = 45), TLAE was performed using a metal tag (clip) after surgery; in the control group 2 (n = 38), classical lymphadenectomy (LAE) was performed. The following characteristics were evaluated: the size of the primary tumor and its localization, the degree of malignan  cy (G), the biological subtype of the tumor, the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), the number of metastases in SLN, damage to other lymph nodes, the number of patients who moved from cN1 to cN0. According to these characteristics, the two groups were comparable and there were no statistically significant differences. The effectiveness of NAST was assessed by the frequency of complete pathomorphological regression of the lesion of the studied tissue. The frequency of identification of sentinel lymph nodes was assessed with urgent cytological and routine pathomorphological studies.

Results. In group 1, a complete pathomorphological response in the mammary gland was 37.8 %, in group 2 – 31.6 %. A complete pathomorphological response in the affected lymph node (N0) after neoadjuvant polychemotherapy (NAST) was achieved in 51.1 % of patients in group 1 and 52.6 % in group 2. The frequency of identification of sentinel lymph nodes during biopsy in both groups was 100 %. The frequency of identification of the installed tag was 100 %. The frequency of coincidences of the clipped lymph node with the sentinel lymph node was 65 %. In one case, migration of the installed label was noted. The efficiency of using the navigation explorer was 93 %.

Conclusion. The results obtained confirm the expediency, feasibility and high efficiency of de-escalation of surgical intervention in the form of TLAE. Our study also demonstrates the relative simplicity and accuracy of using a metal tag to achieve TLAE goals.

About the Authors

Sh. Sh. Abdulloeva
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Shakhnoza Sh. Abdulloeva – PhD student of the Department of Oncology and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of the Breast and Skin, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3178-0877

SPIN: 6064-5690, AuthorID: 1269508


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



A. D. Kaprin
https://new.nmicr.ru
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation;

National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation;

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Andrey D. Kaprin – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Academician of the Russian Academy of Education, Director of P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation; General Director of National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russian Federation; Head of the Department of Oncology and Radiology named after V.P. Kharchenko at the Medical Institute. V.P. Kharchenko Medical Institute of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-8415

SPIN: 1759-8101, AuthorID: 96775

Scopus Author ID: 6602709853

ResearcherID: K-1445-2014


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation;

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University);

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Aziz D. Zikiryakhodzhaev – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Head of the Department of Oncology and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of the Breast and Skin, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation; Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine of Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation; Professor of the Department of Oncology and Radiology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7141-2502

SPIN: 8421-0364, AuthorID: 701248

Scopus Author ID: 57188717273


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



E. K. Saribekian
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Erik K. Saribekian – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Leading Researcher of the Department of Oncology and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of the Breast and Skin of P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0827-7998

SPIN: 3491-0586, AuthorID: 722452


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



E. A. Rasskazova
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Elena A. Rasskazova – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Research Associate of the Department of Oncology and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of the Breast and Skin of P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-8252

SPIN: 5476-1500, AuthorID: 418978

Scopus Author ID: 55948579400


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



I. M. Onofriychuk
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Irina M. Onofriychuk – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Research Associate of the Department of Oncology and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of the Breast and Skin of P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1742-3205

SPIN: 2577-4539, AuthorID: 885003

Scopus Author ID: 57828851200


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



Ju. I. Volkova
https://botkinmoscow.ru
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Julia I. Volkova – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), MD, Oncologist at the Department of Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of the Breast and Female Reproductive System of the Outpatient Oncological Care Center, S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8187-7450

SPIN: 9309-4790, AuthorID: 1036364


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



U. Khomidi
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Khomidi Umar – PhD student of the Department of Oncology and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of the Breast and Skin of P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9011-9189


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



D. B. Kodzoeva
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Dali B. Kodzoeva – PhD student of the Department of Oncology and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery of the Breast and Skin of P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4257-3530


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



L. P. Kazaryan
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Ludmila P. Kazaryan – MD, oncologist, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3860-450X

SPIN: 7809-4178, AuthorID: 1036268


Competing Interests:

Andrey D. Kaprin is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



References

1. Malygin SE. The role of mastectomy in treatment and prophylaxis of breast cancer: beginning, evolution and recent changes. Malignant Tumours 2015;4:3–13. https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2015-4-3-13

2. Lázár G. Az emlőrák sebészi kezelése, az elvárható hazai és nemzetközi standardok [Surgical treatment of breast cancer, national and international standards of care]. 2023,76(1):2-6. (In Hungarian). https://doi.org/10.1556/1046.2023.10008

3. Ben-Dror J, Shalamov M, Sonnenblick A. The History of Early Breast Cancer Treatment. Genes (Basel). 2022 May 27;13(6):960. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060960

4. Atkins H, Hayward JL, Klugman DJ, Wayte AB. Treatment of early breast cancer: a report after ten years of a clinical trial. Br Med J. 1972 May 20;2(5811):423–429. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5811.423

5. Spautz CC, Schunemann Junior E, Budel LR, Cavalcanti TCS, Louveira MH, Junior PG, et al. Marking axillary nodes with 4% carbon microparticle suspension before neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves sentinel node identification rate and axillary staging. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;122(2):164–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25928

6. Wang H, Mao X. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Jun 18;14:2423–2433. https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s253961

7. Cao S, Liu X, Cui J, Liu X, Zhong J, Yang Z, Sun D, Wei W. Feasibility and reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with positive axillary nodes at initial diagnosis: An up-to-date meta-analysis of 3,578 patients. Breast. 2021 Oct;59:256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.015

8. Charalampoudis P, Markopoulos C, Kovacs T. Controversies and recommendations regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: A comprehensive review of current data. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;44(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.10.215

9. Gui G. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer (Br J Surg 2006: 93: 539-546). Br J Surg. 2006 Aug;93(8):1025–1026; author reply 1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5557

10. Semiglazov VF, Krivorotko PV, Zhiltsova EK, Kanaev SV, Trufanova ES, Krzhivitskiy PI, et al. Twenty-year experience of examining biopsies of signal lymph nodes in breast cancer. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2020;16(1):12–20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2020-16-1-12-20

11. Starkova MV, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Grushina TI, Surkova VS, Slavnova EN, Leontyev AV. Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early breast cancer. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2019;8(6):422–427. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20198061422

12. Volkova YuI, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Volchenko NN, Kazaryan LP, Starkova MV, Dzhabrailova DSh, Maksimov KV. Diagnosis of the sentinel lymph node during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2021;10(6):100–105. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog202110061100

13. Volkova YuI, Starkova MV, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD. Sentinel lymph node biopsy or targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant polychemotherapy. Russian News of Clinical Cytology 2021;25(3):13–18. (In Russ.).

14. Munck F, Jepsen P, Zeuthen P, Carstensen L, Hauerslev K, Paaskesen CK, et al. Comparing Methods for Targeted Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide, Retrospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6361–6369. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13792-x

15. Kouloura A, Lanitis S, Filopoulos E, Angelopoulos MP, Kosmidis SP, Arkadopoulos N. Ongoing clinical trials on axillary management. Minerva Chir. 2020 Dec;75(6):408–418. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4733.20.08490-4

16. Montagna G, Corso G, Di Micco R, Van Den Rul N, Rocco N. Axillary management after neoadjuvant treatment. Minerva Chir. 2020 Dec;75(6):400–407. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4733.20.08600-9

17. Kelly AM, Dwamena B, Cronin P, Carlos RC. Breast cancer sentinel node identification and classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-systematic review and meta analysis. Acad Radiol. 2009 May;16(5):551–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.026

18. Barrio AV, Montagna G, Mamtani A, Sevilimedu V, Edelweiss M, Capko D, et al. Nodal Recurrence in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-A Rare Event. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1851–1855. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4394

19. Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B, et al.; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1455–1461. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.278932

20. Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, Holloway CM, Gaboury L, Sideris L, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):258–264. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.55.7827

21. Natsiopoulos I, Intzes S, Liappis T, Zarampoukas K, Zarampoukas T, Zacharopoulou V, Papazisis K. Axillary Lymph Node Tattooing and Targeted Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients Who Presented as cN+ Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Became cN0 After Treatment. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Jun;19(3):208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2019.01.013

22. Patel R, MacKerricher W, Tsai J, Choy N, Lipson J, Ikeda D, et al. Pretreatment Tattoo Marking of Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes: Reliability and Correlation with Sentinel Lymph Node. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(8):2452–2458. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07419-3

23. Sun J, Henry DA, Carr MJ, Yazdankhahkenary A, Laronga C, Lee MC, et al. Feasibility of Axillary Lymph Node Localization and Excision Using Radar Reflector Localization. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Jun;21(3):e189–e193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2020.08.001

24. Lowes S, Bell A, Milligan R, Amonkar S, Leaver A. Use of Hologic LOCalizer radiofrequency identification (RFID) tags to localise impalpable breast lesions and axillary nodes: experience of the first 150 cases in a UK breast unit. Clin Radiol. 2020 Dec;75(12):942–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.08.014

25. Sutton TL, Johnson N, Garreau JR. Adequate sentinel node harvest is associated with low false negative rate in breast cancer managed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and targeted axillary dissection. Am J Surg. 2020 May;219(5):851–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.03.012

26. van Nijnatten TJA, Simons JM, Smidt ML, van der Pol CC, van Diest PJ, Jager A, et al. A Novel Less-invasive Approach for Axillary Staging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Axillary Node-positive Breast Cancer by Combining Radioactive Iodine Seed Localization in the Axilla With the Sentinel Node Procedure (RISAS): A Dutch Prospective MultiCentre Validation Study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Aug;17(5):399–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.006

27. Wazir U, Tayeh S, Perry N, Michell M, Malhotra A, Mokbel K. Wireless Breast Localization Using Radio-frequency Identification Tags: The First Reported European Experience in Breast Cancer. In Vivo. 2020 Jan-Feb;34(1):233–238. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11765

28. Petrovsky AV, Soloshchenko AI, Gerasimov AN, Litvinov RP, Karpova MS, Ponedelnikova NV, et al. Choice of the optimal metastatic lymph node marking in patients with breast cancer. Malignant tumours. 2023;13(1):11–16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-1-11-16

29. Emelyanov AS, Krivorotko PV, Zhiltsova EK, Komyakhov AV, Busko EA, Krzhivitsky PI, et al. Axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients downstaging from cN+ to ycN0. Problems in Oncology. 2022;68(3):322–332. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2022-68-3-322-332

30. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):927–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70207-2

31. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 7;349(6):546–553. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa012782

32. Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Le-Petross HT, McCall LM, Mittendorf EA, et al. Identification and Resection of Clipped Node Decreases the False-negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Patients Presenting with node-positive Breast Cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):802–807. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001375

33. Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):609– 618. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70166-9

34. Bozhok AA, Tsarev ON, Maysuradze SA, Gil AI. Questions of axillary region surgery in breast cancer patients after systemic neoadjuvant therapy. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2021;17(4):56–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2021-17-4-56-65

35. Burstein HJ, Curigliano G, Loibl S, Dubsky P, Gnant M, Poortmans P, et al.; Members of the St. Gallen International Consensus Panel on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2019. Estimating the benefits of therapy for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2019. Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1541–1557. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz235

36. Classe JM, Loaec C, Gimbergues P, Alran S, de Lara CT, Dupre PF, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenec tomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):343–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-5004-7

37. Donker M, Straver ME, Wesseling J, Loo CE, Schot M, Drukker CA, et al. Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients: the MARI procedure. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):378–382. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000558

38. Flores-Funes D, Aguilar-Jiménez J, Martínez-Gálvez M, Ibáñez-Ibáñez MJ, Carrasco-González L, Gil-Izquierdo JI, et al. Validation of the targeted axillary dissection technique in the axillary staging of breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: Preliminary results. Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;30:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.019

39. Gatek J, Petru V, Kosac P, Ratajsky M, Duben J, Dudesek B, et al. Targeted axillary dissection with preoperative tattooing of biopsied pos itive axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. Neoplasma. 2020 Nov;67(6):1329–1334. https://doi.org/10.4149/neo_2020_191228n1344

40. Kuemmel S, Heil J, Rueland A, Seiberling C, Harrach H, Schindowski D, et al. A Prospective, MultiCentre Registry Study to Evaluate the Clinical Feasibility of Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD) in Node-positive Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):e553–e562. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004572

41. Mariscal Martínez A, Vives Roselló I, Salazar Gómez A, Catanese A, et al. Advantages of preoperative localization and surgical re section of metastatic axillary lymph nodes using magnetic seeds after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;36:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2020.11.013

42. Swarnkar PK, Tayeh S, Michell MJ, Mokbel K. The Evolving Role of Marked Lymph Node Biopsy (MLNB) and Targeted Axillary Dis section (TAD) after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;13(7):1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071539


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Abdulloeva Sh.Sh., Kaprin A.D., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Saribekian E.K., Rasskazova E.A., Onofriychuk I.M., Volkova J.I., Khomidi U., Kodzoeva D.B., Kazaryan L.P. Results of targeted lymphadenectomy in patients with breast cancer cT1-3N1M0 after neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2025;12(1):8-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2025-12-1-1. EDN: URZOFV

Views: 264


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-1893 (Online)