Epidermal growth factor receptor blockers – known possibilities and new perspectives in oncology
https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2025-12-4-8
EDN: XBGPGO
Abstract
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a critical signaling molecule that, upon activation, promotes neoplastic transformation and metastasis. The utilization of targeted drugs, specifically EGFR inhibitors, has emerged as a pivotal component in the management of diverse malignant neoplasms. Among them, low-molecular-weight heterocyclic compounds acting as blockers of the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain occupy a key position.
Purpose of the study. Is to conduct analysis of modern literature data devoted to the development and study of the antitumor acttivity of small molecule EGFR inhibitors, with a focus on blockers of the receptor’s intracellular domain.
Materials and methods. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed and eLibrary databases. The following keywords were entered into the search engine: "EGFR inhibitors", "small molecular weight kinase inhibitors" (SMKIs), "antitumor effect", "pyrimidine derivatives", "molecular docking", and "molecular modeling". Original research articles, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews published predominantly published within the last five years.
Results. The review presents the main characteristics of small molecule EGFR inhibitors, their mechanisms of action, and classification. The present study explores the underlying causes of resistance to targeted drugs aimed at the internal domain of the receptor, as well as the available strategies for overcoming such drug resistance. The subsequent sections of this text will discuss the development of new EGFR blockers, strategies for increasing their selectivity and efficacy, including through bioinformatic approaches.
Conclusion. Currently, a significant amount of data has been accumulated on the development and use of small molecule heterocyclic EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of cancer patients. The main reasons limiting their use in clinical practice are the emergence of resistance due to receptor mutations and toxicity. In this regard, the search for new candidate compounds with a putative antitumor mechanism of action and high affinity to the target remains relevant. Inhibitory activity against the internal domain of EGFR directly depends on the structure of the heterocycle underlying the drug, which must be taken into account when creating new molecules that block this receptor. An important role in this process is played by computer modeling, which allows for a significant reduction in material costs and time. The presented review can be useful for researchers developing domestic targeted drugs aimed at the internal domain of EGFR, as part of import substitution to ensure the technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. M. FrantsiyantsRussian Federation
Elena M. Frantsiyants – Dr. Sci. (Biology), Professor, Deputy General Director for Science
Author ID: 462868
Scopus Author ID: 55890047700
WoS Researcher ID: Y-1491-2018
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
I. V. Kaplieva
Russian Federation
Irina V. Kaplieva – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Study of Malignant Tumor Pathogenesis
Author ID: 734116
Scopus Author ID: 23994000800
WoS Researcher ID: AAE-3540-2019
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
E. V. Shalashnaya
Russian Federation
Elena V. Shalashnaya – Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Study of Malignant Tumor Pathogenesis
Author ID: 476958
Scopus Author ID: 55144159900
WoS Researcher ID: AAE-4085-2022
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
A. I. Shikhlyarova
Russian Federation
Alla I. Shikhlyarova – Dr. Sci. (Biology), Professor, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Study of Malignant Tumor Pathogenesis
Author ID: 482103
Scopus Author ID: 6507723229
WoS Researcher ID: Y-6275-2018
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
N. A. Maksimova
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Maksimova – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Department of Radionuclide Therapy and Diagnostics, Head of the Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics
Author ID: 375005
Scopus Author ID: 57211495326
WoS Researcher ID: AAT-9775-2020
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
S. N. Dimitriadi
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Dimitriadi – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Senior Researcher, Urology Department
Author ID: 692389
Scopus Author ID: 57076760200
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
E K. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Eduard K. Alekseev – PhD student
Author ID: 1236262
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
P. S. Kachesova
Russian Federation
Polina S. Kachesova – Cand. Sci. (Biology), research associate, Laboratory of Study of Malignant Tumor Pathogenesis
Author ID: 571595
Scopus Author ID: 55144158500
WoS Researcher ID: AAF-3998-2019
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
L. K. Trepitaki
Russian Federation
Lidia K. Trepitaki – Cand. Sci. (Biology), research associate, Laboratory of Study of Malignant Tumor Pathogenesis
Author ID: 734359
Scopus Author ID: 55357624700
WoS Researcher ID: AAG-9218-2019
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
K. A. Avanesova
Russian Federation
Kristina A. Avanesova – doctor of clinical laboratory diagnostics of the clinical diagnostic laboratory
Author ID: 1209124
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
the authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article
References
1. Sung H., Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
2. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2022 (incidence and mortality). Moscow: P. A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre; 2023. (In Russ.). Available at: https://glavonco.ru/cancer_register/zis-2022-elektronnaya-versiya.pdf Accessed: 12.11.2025.
3. Gach-Janczak K, Drogosz-Stachowicz J, Janecka A, Wtorek K, Mirowski M. Historical Perspective and Current Trends in Anticancer Drug Development. Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 15;16(10):1878. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101878
4. Li J, Gong C, Zhou H, Liu J, Xia X, Ha W, et al. Kinase Inhibitors and Kinase-Targeted Cancer Therapies: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 17;25(10):5489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105489
5. Roskoski R Jr. The ErbB/HER family of protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2014 Jan;79:34–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2013.11.002
6. Tydings CW, Singh B, Smith AW, Ledwitch KV, Brown BP, Lovly CM, et al. Analysis of EGFR binding hotspots for design of new EGFR inhibitory biologics. Protein Sci. 2024 Oct;33(10):e5141. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5141
7. Oda K, Matsuoka Y, Funahashi A, Kitano H. A comprehensive pathway map of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Mol Syst Biol. 2005;1:2005.0010. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100014
8. Nasretdinov AF, Menshikov KV, Sultanbaev AV, Musin SI, Sultanbaeva NI, Men'shikova IA. The mechanism of action of different generations of EGFR-inhibitors in malignant lung tumors. Literature review and data synthesis. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2022;24(3):340–344. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2022.3.201813
9. Lyanova AA, Vladimirova LYu, Ulyanova EP, Abramova NA, Storozhakova AE, Popova IL, et al. Dynamics of changes in expression of VEGF neoangiogenic factor in tumor tissue bioptates in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oral mucosa receiving cetuximab treatment and chemotherapy. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2022;3(4):40–48. https://doi.org/10.37748/2686-9039-2022-3-4-4
10. Cai WQ, Zeng LS, Wang LF, Wang YY, Cheng JT, Zhang Y, et al. The latest battles between EGFR monoclonal antibodies and resistant tumor cells. Front Oncol 2020;10(1249):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01249
11. Tran TTT, Phung CD, Yeo BZJ, Prajogo RC, Jayasinghe MK, Yuan J, et al. Customised design of antisense oligonucleotides targeting EGFR driver mutants for personalised treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. EBioMedicine. 2024 Oct;108:105356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105356
12. Pottier C, Fresnais M, Gilon M, Jérusalem G, Longuespée R, Sounni NE. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer: Breakthrough and Challenges of Targeted Therapy. Cancers. 2020;12(3):731. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030731
13. Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, Novello S, Smit EF, Faivre-Finn C, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2018,29(4):192–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy275
14. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, et al. Final overall survival results from a randomised, phase III study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802). Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1877–1883. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv276
15. Hawash M. Advances in Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of CDK and EGFR Inhibitors. Cells. 2024; 13(19):1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13191656
16. Paz-Ares L, Tan EH, O'Byrne K, Zhang L, Hirsh V, Boyer M, et al. Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial. Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):270– 277. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw611
17. Wu YL, Cheng Y, Zhou, X, Lee KH, Nakagawa K, Niho S, et al. Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1454–1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30608-3
18. Hochmair MJ, Morabito A, Hao D, Yang CT, Soo, RA, Yang JC, et al. Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: Updated analysis of the observational GioTag study. Future Oncol. 2019,15(25):2905–2914. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0346
19. Eno MS, Brubaker JD, Campbell JE, De Savi C, Guzi TJ, Williams BD, et al. Discovery of BLU-945, a Reversible, Potent, and WildType-Sparing Next-Generation EGFR Mutant Inhibitor for Treatment-Resistant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Med Chem. 2022 Jul 28;65(14):9662–9677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00704
20. Shao J, Gu Y, Guo R, Xu J. A Visual Analysis of the Research Dynamics in Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors for NSCLC. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Jun 26;18:2571–2591. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S465238
21. Kashima K, Kawauchi H, Tanimura H, Tachibana Y, Chiba T, Torizawa T, Sakamoto H. CH7233163 Overcomes Osimertinib-Resistant EGFR-Del19/T790M/C797S Mutation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19:2288–2297. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0229
22. Wang X, Zhou L, Yin JC, Wu X, Shao YW, Gao B. Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring EGFR 19del/C797S/T790M Triple Mutations Responds to Brigatinib and Anti-EGFR Antibody Combination Therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 May;14(5):e85–e88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.015
23. Wang Y, Yang N, Zhang Y, Li Li, Han R, Zhu M, et al. Effective Treatment of Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring EGFR-Activating Mutation, T790M, and cis-C797S Triple Mutations by Brigatinib and Cetuximab Combination Therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Aug;15(8):1369– 1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.04.014
24. Jia Y, Yun CH, Park E, Ercan D, Manuia M, Juarez J, et al. Overcoming EGFR(T790M) and EGFR(C797S) resistance with mutant-selective allosteric inhibitors. Nature. 2016 Jun 2;534(7605):129–132. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17960
25. Yadav TT, Moin Shaikh G, Kumar MS, Chintamaneni M, Yc M. A Review on Fused Pyrimidine Systems as EGFR Inhibitors and Their Structure-Activity Relationship. Front Chem. 2022 Jun 13;10:861288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.861288
26. Venugopala KN, Kamat V. Pyrimidines: A New Versatile Molecule in the Drug Development Field, Scope, and Future Aspects. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17:1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101258
27. Nitulescu GM, Stancov G, Seremet OC, Nitulescu G, Mihai DP, Duta-Bratu CG, et al. The Importance of the Pyrazole Scaffold in the Design of Protein Kinases Inhibitors as Targeted Anticancer Therapies. Molecules 2023;28:5359. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145359
28. Rajeeve AD, Yamuna R, Namboori PKK. Elucidating the potential of EGFR mutated NSCLC and identifying its multitargeted inhibitors. Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):3649. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83868-5
29. Șandor A, Ionuț I, Marc G, Oniga I, Eniu D, Oniga O. Structure-activity relationship studies based on quinazoline derivatives as EGFR kinase inhibitors (2017-Present). Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023;16:534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040534
30. Radwan AA, Alanazi F, Al-Dhfyan A. Bioinformatics-driven discovery of novel EGFR kinase inhibitors as anti-cancer therapeutics: In silico screening and in vitro evaluation. PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0298326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298326
31. Todsaporn D, Zubenko A, Kartsev VG, Mahalapbutr P, Geronikaki A, Sirakanyan SN, et al. Furopyridine Derivatives as Potent Inhibitors of the Wild Type, L858R/T790M, and L858R/T790M/C797S EGFR. J Phys Chem B. 2024 Dec 19;128(50):12389–12402. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c06246
32. Anwar S, Alanazi J, Ahemad N, Raza S, Chohan TA, Saleem H. Deciphering quinazoline derivatives' interactions with EGFR: a computational quest for advanced cancer therapy through 3D-QSAR, virtual screening, and MD simulations. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 24;15:1399372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1399372
33. Zhou R, Liu Z, Wu T, Pan X, Li T, Miao K, et al. Machine learning-aided discovery of T790M-mutant EGFR inhibitor CDDO-Me effectively suppresses non-small cell lung cancer growth. Cell Commun Signal. 2024 December 5;22:585. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-024-01954-7
34. Nammalwar B, Bunce RA. Recent Advances in Pyrimidine-Based Drugs. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jan 11;17(1):104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010104
35. Chiriapkin АС. Review of pyrimidine derivatives as pharmacologically active compounds. Juvenis Scientia. 2022;8(5):16–30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32415/jscientia_2022_8_5_16-30
36. Reymova F, Sever B, Topalan E, Sevimli-Gur C, Can M, Tuyun AF, et al. Design, Synthesis, and Mechanistic Anticancer Evaluation of New Pyrimidine-Tethered Compounds. Pharmaceuticals 2025;18:270. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18020270
37. Baillache DJ, Unciti-Broceta A. Recent developments in anticancer kinase inhibitors based on the pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine scaffold. RSC Med Chem. 2020 Sep 8;11(10):1112–1135. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0md00227e
38. Li MC, Coumar MS, Lin SY, Lin YS, Huang GL, Chen CH, et al. Development of Furanopyrimidine-Based Orally Active Third-Generation EGFR Inhibitors for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Med Chem. 2023 Feb 23;66(4):2566–2588. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01434
39. Guo Y, Gao B, Gao P, Fang L, Gou S. Novel anilinopyrimidine derivatives as potential EGFRT790M/C797S Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, biological activity study. Bioorg Med Chem. 2022 Sep 15;70:116907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116907
40. Mostafa YA, Assoud JA, Desoky AY, Mohamady S, Mohamed NM, Salem OIA, et al. New series of 4,6-diaryl pyrimidines: facile synthesis and antiproliferative activity as dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 inhibitors. Front Chem. 2024 Nov 6;12:1498104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2024.1498104
41. Kaur P, Singh SK, Mishra MK, Singh S, Singh R. Promising Combinatorial Therapeutic Strategies against Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers. 2024;16(12):2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16122205
42. Slominski RM, Kim T-K, Janjetovic Z, Brożyna AA, Podgorska E, Dixon KM, et al. Malignant Melanoma: An Overview, New Perspectives, and Vitamin D Signaling. Cancers. 2024;16(12):2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16122262
43. Bai W, Yan C, Yang Y, Sang L, Hao Q, Yao X, et al. EGF/EGFR-YAP1/TEAD2 signaling upregulates STIM1 in vemurafenib resistant melanoma cells. FEBS J. 2024 Nov;291(22):4969–4983. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.17272
44. Pastwińska J, Karaś K, Karwaciak I, Ratajewski M. Targeting EGFR in melanoma – the sea of possibilities to overcome drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022 Jul;1877(4):188754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188754
45. Kit OI, Kodonidi IP, Frantsiyants EM, Kaplieva IV, Glushko AA, Trepitaki LK, et al. Preliminary evaluation of the antitumor efficacy of a new epidermal growth factor receptor blocker. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2025;1:16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.33891
46. Kit OI, Kodonidi IP, Frantsiyants EM, Kaplieva IV, Glushko AA, Trepitaki LK, et al. Antitumor effect of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2024;11(3):54–64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2024-11-3-4
47. Elsenbawy ESM, Alshehri ZS, Babteen NA, Abdel-Rahman AA, El-Manawaty MA, Nossier ES, et al. Designing Potent Anti-Cancer Agents: Synthesis and Molecular Docking Studies of Thieno[2,3-d][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine Derivatives. Molecules. 2024 Feb 29;29(5):1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051067
48. Al-Wahaibi LH, Elshamsy AM, Ali TFS, Youssif BGM, Bräse S, Abdel-Aziz M, El-Koussi NA. Design and Synthesis of New Dihydropyrimidine Derivatives with a Cytotoxic Effect as Dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 Inhibitors. ACS Omega. 2024 Aug 1;9(32):34358–34369. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c01361
Review
For citations:
Frantsiyants E.M., Kaplieva I.V., Shalashnaya E.V., Shikhlyarova A.I., Maksimova N.A., Dimitriadi S.N., Alekseev E.K., Kachesova P.S., Trepitaki L.K., Avanesova K.A. Epidermal growth factor receptor blockers – known possibilities and new perspectives in oncology. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2025;12(4):96-112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2025-12-4-8. EDN: XBGPGO


















