Preview

Research and Practical Medicine Journal

Advanced search

Predictors of complete pathological response to neoadjuvant TCHP therapy in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer: a single-center experience

https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2025-12-4-3

EDN: KBOBFP

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dual anti-HER2 blockade is the standard of care for early HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), leading to a complete pathological response (pCR) in a significant proportion of patients. However, the response to therapy is heterogeneous, and the identification of accessible clinicopathological predictors of pCR remains a key challenge for treatment personalization and efficacy prediction.

Purpose of the study. To evaluate the efficacy of the TCHP (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, pertuzumab) neoadjuvant regimen and to identify independent clinicopathological predictors of achieving pCR in patients with stage IIA–IIIA HER2-positive BC.

Patients and methods. A single-center retrospective study was conducted at the P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute. The analysis included data from 120 patients with stage IIA–IIIA HER2-positive BC who received neoadjuvant TCHP therapy between 2022 and 2025. The primary endpoint was the rate of pCR (ypT0/is ypN0). Univariate comparative analysis and multivariate binary logistic regression were used to identify predictors of response. ROC analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for the predictor.

Results. Complete pathological response was achieved in 70 out of 120 patients (58.3 %). In the multivariate analysis, estrogen receptor (ER) expression level was the only independent predictor of pCR. For each one-point increase in the Allred score for ER expression, the odds of achieving pCR decreased by 16.1 % (OR 0.839; 95 % CI 0.753–0.934; p = 0.001). ROC analysis identified an optimal cutoff value for ER expression of ≤ 6 points for predicting pCR (AUC = 0.665; p = 0.001).

Conclusion. ER expression level is a key independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant TCHP therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. ER expression assessment can be used in clinical practice as an accessible biomarker for patient stratification and for identifying a group with a lower likelihood of achieving pCR who may require alternative or intensified therapeutic regimens.

About the Authors

M. S. Ruban
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Maksim S. Ruban – PhD Student, Department of Chemotherapy, Division of Drug Treatment of Tumors, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-2009

eLibrary SPIN: 2319-2693, AuthorID: 1170985

Scopus Author ID:  59501818300


Competing Interests:

Larisa V. Bolotina is the Member of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



L. V. Bolotina
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Larisa V. Bolotina – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Chemotherapy Department, Division of Drug Treatment of Tumors, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4879-2687

eLibrary SPIN: 2787-5414, AuthorID: 594953

Scopus Author ID:  50960914200

WoS ResearcherID: U-5441-2019


Competing Interests:

Larisa V. Bolotina is the Member of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



Yu. B. Karagodina
https://new.nmicr.ru/mnioi/
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre

Moscow, Russian Federation

 

Yulia B. Karagodina – Researcher, Division of Drug Treatment of Tumors, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3196-1368

eLibrary SPIN: 2409-7696, AuthorID: 1170902


Competing Interests:

Larisa V. Bolotina is the Member of the Editorial Board of the Journal «Research’n Practical Medicine Journal» and one of the authors of the article. The article has passed the review procedure accepted in the Journal by independent experts. The authors did not declare any other conflicts of interest.



References

1. Li YW, Dai LJ, Wu XR, Zhao S, Xu YZ, Jin X, et al. Molecular Characterization and Classification of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Inform Tailored Therapeutic Strategies. Cancer Res. 2024 Nov 4;84(21):3669-3683. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-4066

2. Pan L, Li J, Xu Q, Gao Z, Yang M, Wu X, Li X. HER2/PI3K/AKT pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer: A review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 14;103(24):e38508. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000038508

3. Cheng X. A Comprehensive Review of HER2 in Cancer Biology and Therapeutics. Genes (Basel). 2024 Jul 11;15(7):903. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070903

4. Xu L, Xie Y, Gou Q, Cai R, Bao R, Huang Y, Tang R. HER2-targeted therapies for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: present and future. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1446414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1446414

5. Swain SM, Shastry M, Hamilton E. Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer: advances and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023 Feb;22(2):101-126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-022-00579-0

6. van der Voort A, Liefaard MC, van Ramshorst MS, van Werkhoven E, Sanders J, Wesseling J, et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with or without pertuzumab in patients with stage II and III HER2-positive breast cancer: a nationwide cohort analysis of pathologic response and 5-year survival. Breast. 2022 Oct;65:110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.07.005

7. Canino F, Barbolini M, De Giorgi U, Fontana T, Gaspari V, Gianni C, et al. Safety and efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab, trastuzumab and standard chemotherapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer: real-world data from NeoPowER study. BMC Cancer. 2024 Jun 15;24(1):735. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12506-0

8. Dowling GP, Keelan S, Toomey S, Daly GR, Hennessy BT, Hill ADK. Review of the status of neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 30;13:1066007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1066007

9. Campbell JI, Yau C, Krass P, Moore D, Carey LA, Au A, et al. Comparison of residual cancer burden, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and pathologic complete response in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;165(1):181-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4303-8

10. Yau C, Osdoit M, van der Noordaa M, Shad S, Wei J, de Croze D, et al. Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):149- 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00589-1

11. Lee SY, Yoo TK, Lee SB, Kim J, Chung IY, Ko BS, et al. Prognostic value of residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a comprehensive subtype-specific analysis. Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 22;15(1):13977. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98176-9

12. Geyer CE Jr, Untch M, Huang CS, Mano MS, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N, et al.; KATHERINE Study Group. Survival with Trastuzumab Emtansine in Residual HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2025 Jan 16;392(3):249-257. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2406070

13. Ma Y, Zhu M, Lv M, Yuan P, Chen X, Liu Z. Impact of residual disease biomarkers on the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant therapy. Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(10):11293-11304. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5839

14. Fang Y, Zhang Q, Wu Y, Wu J. HER2-positive is an independent indicator for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy and Ki67-changed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favorable prognosis in Chinese women with locally advanced breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 9;103(6):e37170. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000037170

15. Pegram M, Jackisch C, Johnston SRD. Estrogen/HER2 receptor crosstalk in breast cancer: combination therapies to improve outcomes for patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 May 31;9(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00533-2

16. Hännikäinen EN, Mattson J, Karihtala P. Predictors of successful neoadjuvant treatment in HER2 positive breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2023 Aug 22;26(4):434. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.14021

17. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, et al. 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):791-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00163-7

18. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Hegg R, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2278-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt182

19. van Ramshorst MS, van der Voort A, van Werkhoven ED, Mandjes IA, Kemper I, Dezentjé VO, et al.; Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines in the presence of dual HER2 blockade for HER2-positive breast cancer (TRAIN-2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1630-1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30570-9

20. Mehta A, Tripathy D. Co-targeting estrogen receptor and HER2 pathways in breast cancer. Breast. 2014 Feb;23(1):2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.09.006

21. Schettini F, Buono G, Cardalesi C, Desideri I, De Placido S, Del Mastro L. Hormone Receptor/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-positive breast cancer: Where we are now and where we are going. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 May;46:20-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.03.012

22. Luz P, Lopes-Brás R, de Pinho IS, Patel V, Esperança-Martins M, Gonçalves L, et al. Predictive factors for pCR and relapse following neoadjuvant dual HER2-blockade in HER2+ breast cancer: an international cohort study. Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Nov;27(11):4160- 4169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-025-03937-7

23. Ding J, Yang Y, Jiang L, Wu W, Shao Z. Predictive factors of pathologic complete response in HER2-positive and axillary lymph node positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant paclitaxel, carboplatin plus with trastuzumab. Oncotarget. 2017 May 19;8(34):56626- 56634. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17993

24. Gianni L, Bisagni G, Colleoni M, Del Mastro L, Zamagni C, Mansutti M, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and pertuzumab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant in HER2-positive, ER-positive breast cancer (NA-PHER2): an exploratory, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30001-9

25. Litton JK, Regan MM, Pusztai L, Rugo HS, Tolaney SM, Garrett-Mayer E, et al. Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 20;41(27):4433-4442. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.23.00435


Review

For citations:


Ruban M.S., Bolotina L.V., Karagodina Yu.B. Predictors of complete pathological response to neoadjuvant TCHP therapy in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer: a single-center experience. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2025;12(4):34-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2025-12-4-3. EDN: KBOBFP

Views: 1205

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-1893 (Online)