POSSIBILITIES OF ORGAN-PRESERVING TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPNEOADJUVANT COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY IN A PATIENT WITH CERVICAL CANCER IIIB STAGE WITH THE USE OF INTRA-ARTERIAL ADMINISTRATION OF PLATINUM DRUGS
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2017-4-2-8
Abstract
The main treatment for cervical cancer are surgery, radiation and combined (surgery + radiotherapy), the role of chemotherapy in this localization is studied less fully. In recent years the new possibilities of chemotherapy, including neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy, are explored. Theoretical prerequisites for this are the best drug delivery to the tumor by blood vessels, undamaged due to radiation therapy and surgery. This paper describes a clinical case of a patient with primary inoperable cervical cancer. As an alternative to preoperativ e radiotherapy the patient was proposed neoadjuv ant com bination chemotherapy with the use of regional administration of platinum drugs and systemic administration of drugs of taxan series as a stage of preparation for further surgical treatment. According to the prevalence of the tumor process patient underwent 2 courses of neoadjuv ant chemotherapy by a method of superselective intra-arterial administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel intravenously. According to a comprehensive examination after treatment data for the presence of tumor was absent. During the second stage the patient underwent surgical treatment in the volume of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with appendages. The next step, according to the histological form of the tumor, stage of disease, was the radiotherapy in the postoperative period on the pelv ic area and routes of lym ph drainage. The patient underwent external beam radiotherapy to the pelvic area of FD = 20 Gr, intracavitary gamma-therapy and external beam radiation on the area of parametrial and lymphopenia FD = 50 Gr.The patient passed the control examinations every 3 months. According to a comprehensive survey a year after the start of treatment — there is no data for the presence of recurrence and spread of tumor process.
About the Authors
A. G. RerbergRussian Federation
Andrey G. Rerberg, PhD., Head of the Department of roentgenosurgical methods of diagnosis and treatment
A. A. Kostin
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Kostin, MD., Professor, Head of Department of urology, oncology and radiology of FAS, Medical institute, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, First Deputy General Director National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
A. V. Boyko
Russian Federation
Anna V. Boyko, MD, professor, Head of Department of radiotherapy with modification
E. G. Novikova
Russian Federation
Elena G. Novikova, MD, professor, Head of Department of gynecology
N. N. Volchenko
Russian Federation
Nadezhda N. Volchenko, MD, professor, Head of Department of oncocytology
O. V. Chulkova
Russian Federation
Olga V. Chulkov, M. D., leading researcher at the Department of gynecology
L. V. Demidova
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Demidova, MD., leading researcher at the Department of radiotherapy with modification
G. I. Khokchrikov
Russian Federation
Gennadiy I. Khokhrikov, PhD, senior researcher at the Department of roentgenosurgical methods of diagnosis and treatment
D. Yu. Sidorov
Russian Federation
Dmitry Yu. Sidorov, doctor of Department of roentgenosurgical methods of diagnosis and treatment
A. R. Gevorkyan
Russian Federation
Andrey R. Gevorkyan, clinical resident
For correspondence:Address: 3, 2nd Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow, 125284
References
1. Minimal clinical recommendations of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Мoscow, 2010. Available at: http://onkolog.cv.ua/images/PDF_statti/shlunkovo-kishkovyi/gastric.pdf (In Russian).
2. The all-Russian Union of public associations, the Association of oncologists of Russia. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatm ent of cervical cancer. Мoscow, 2014. Available at: http://www.oncology.ru/association/clinicalguidelines/2014/55.pdf (In Russian).
3. Umeki H, Yamaguchi Y, Tsugata M, Wakana K, Somekawa Y, Shimabukuro K, et al. Neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy with nedaplatin, peplomycin and mitomycin C for advanced cervical cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Mar; 30 (3): 377–82.
4. Tian ZZ, Li S, Wang Y, Yue YJ, Zhu XH, Zhao R, et al. Investigation of uterine arterial chemoembolization and uterine arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer before radical radiotherapy: A long-term follow-up study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jul; 290 (1): 155–62. DOI: 10.1007/s00404–014–3166-z
5. Song T, Wang W, Liu P, Chen C. Pharmacokinetic comparison between pelvic transarterial chemoembolization and transcatheter arterial chemotherapy in an anim al model. Mol Med Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug; 2 (4): 663–7. DOI: 10.3892/mmr_00000154.
Review
For citations:
Rerberg A.G., Kostin A.A., Boyko A.V., Novikova E.G., Volchenko N.N., Chulkova O.V., Demidova L.V., Khokchrikov G.I., Sidorov D.Yu., Gevorkyan A.R. POSSIBILITIES OF ORGAN-PRESERVING TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPNEOADJUVANT COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY IN A PATIENT WITH CERVICAL CANCER IIIB STAGE WITH THE USE OF INTRA-ARTERIAL ADMINISTRATION OF PLATINUM DRUGS. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2017;4(2):61-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2017-4-2-8