HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF PHALLOPLASTY
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2017-4-3-8
Abstract
Reconstruction of the penis in transgender operations, amputation of the penis, congenital deformities and anomalies of the penis was and remains today an important issue in plastic surgery of the urogenital region. The only method to restore the penis is phalloplasty. In general, over the past decades, generations of clinicians have different ways and flaps for total fallouretheral reconstruction. Thus was formulated the characteristics of an ideal flap for the formation of neophallos, which should be safe, sensitive, without hair, and with long leg. However, despite the fact that the characteristics of a perfect flap, nowadays there is no “gold standard” in the formation of neophallos, as phalloplasty is a fairly complicated surgery, and the choice of method depends on many factors. The choice of methodology is determined by the plastics surgeon and to each patient is individual, depends on the etiology of the disease and the possibility of choosing the form of the donor’s transplant. This article presents a literature review devoted to the historical aspects of phalloplasty. In the article, in chronological order reflected the evolution of the different forming methods neofallos, phallourethrоplasty, describes their advantages and disadvantages.
About the Authors
P. S. Kyzlasov
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD., associate Professor of the Department of Urology and Andrology IPPE,
23, Marshala Novikova St., Moscow, 123098
M. M. Sokol'shchik
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
Russian Federation
Sokol’shchik, MD, Professor of the Department of Urology and Andrology IPPE
Russian Federation
Sokol’shchik, MD, Professor of the Department of Urology and Andrology IPPE
A. A. Kazhera
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
Russian Federation
resident of Department of Urology and Andrology IPPE
Russian Federation
resident of Department of Urology and Andrology IPPE
M. V. Zabelin
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
Russian Federation
MD, Professor of the Department of Surgery with Oncology courses IPPE
Russian Federation
MD, Professor of the Department of Surgery with Oncology courses IPPE
References
1. Gurjala AN, Nazerali RS, Salim A, Lee GK. World’s First Baby Born Through Natural Insemination by Father with Total Phalloplasty Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 76 (3): 179–183. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000769
2. Bogoras N. U ber die vollepla stische Wiederher stell ungeineszum Koitus fahigen penis (Peniplasticatotalis). ZentralblChir. 1936; 22: 1271–1276.
3. Bogoraz NA. O polnom plasticheskom vosstanovlenii muzhskogo polovogo chlena, sposobnogo k sovokupleniyu. Sovetskaya khirurgiya. 1936; 8: 32–34. (In Russian).
4. Bogoras N. 16 cases of total reconstruction of the penis. Reconstructive plastic surgery. Philadelphia: WBG Sanders, 1977, p. 3909.
5. Salgado CJ, Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Lumen N, Dwyer M, MardiniS. Reconstruction of the penis after surgery. UrolClin North Am. 2010; 37 (3): 379–401. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2010.04.015
6. Milanov NO, Adamian RT, Istranov AL, Vasil’eva EE. The plastic surgery of the male urogenital tract. Part 1: falloplasty; fallouretheroplasty. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N. I. Pirogova (Journal Surgery named after N. I. Pirogov). 2012; 10: 65–69. (In Russian).
7. Gillies HD, Harrison RJ. Congenital absence of the penis with embryological consideration. Br J Plast Surg. 1948; 1 (8): 28.
8. Maltz M. Reparative technique for the penis. In: Maltz M., editor. Evolution of Plastic Surgery. New York, NY: Froben Press., 1946, р. 278–279.
9. Ivanov IA. Restorative operations for combined injuries of the penis and urethra. Diss. Moscow, 1955. (In Russian).
10. Ivanov I.A. Novaya modifikatsiya vosstanovleniya mocheispuskatel’nogo kanala. Trudy Permskogo meditsinskogo instituta. 1958; 28 (5): 11. (In Russian).
11. Komalov AA, Lopatkin NA, Dzeranov NK. Istoriya otechestvennoi urologii [History of Russian urology]. Мoscow: “Dipak” Publ., 2007, pp. 222–228. (In Russian).
12. Nerobeev AI. Vosstanovlenie tkanei golovy i shei slozhnymi arterializirovannymi loskutami [Restoration of the tissues of the head and neck with complex arterialized grafts]. Moscow: “Meditsina” Publ., 1988, 272 p. (In Russian).
13. Horton CE, McCraw JB, Devine CJ, Devine PC. Secondary reconstruction of the genital area. Urol Clin North Am. 1977; 4 (1): 133–139.
14. Laub DR, Fisk N. A rehabilitation program for gender dysphoria syndrome by surgical sex change. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974; 53 (4): 388–403.
15. Puckett CL, Montle JE. Construction of male genitalia in the transsexual using a tubed groin flap for the penis and a hydraulic inflation device. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1978; 61 (4): 523–529.
16. Puckett CL, Relnlsch JF, Montle JE. Free flap phalloplasty. J Urol. 1982; 128 (2): 294–297.
17. Chang TS, Huang WY. Forearm flap In one-stage reconstruction of the penis. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1984; 74 (2): 251–258.
18. Biemer E. Penile construction by the radial arm flap. Clin Plast Surg. 1988; 15 (3): 425–430.
19. Meyer R, Daverio P. One-stage sensible phalloplasty in the transsexual female. Helv Chir Acta. 1987; 5 (1, 2): 175–176.
20. Sadove RC, Sengezer M, McRoberts JW, Wells MD. One-stage total penile reconstruction with a free sensate osteocutaneous fibula flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92 (7): 1314–1323.
21. Milanov NO, Adamyan R. T. Microsurgical phalloplasty in treatment of transsexuals. VIIth Congr Europ Inter Const. & Estet. Surg. Berlin, 1993, 68 р.
22. Milanov NO, Adamyan RT, Kozlov GI. Korrektsiya pola pri transseksualizme [Correction of sex in transsexualism]. Moscow, 1999, pp. 68–69. (In Russian).
23. Adamyan RT. Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery in the Treatment of Transsexualism. Diss. Мoscow, 1996. (In Russian).
24. Rohrich RJ, Allen T, Lester F, Young JP, Katz SL. Simultaneous penis and perineum reconstruction using a combined latissimus dorsi-scapular free flap with intraoperative penile skin expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99 (4): 1138–1141.
25. Hage JJ. Dynaflex prosthesis in totalphalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99 (2): 479–485.
26. Tan HM. Penile prosthesis implantation in a transsexual neophallus. Asian J Androl. 2000; 2 (4): 304–306.
27. Küntscher MV, Hartmann B. The radial forearm phalloplasty with prelaminated urethra: a report of our learning curve during the last 6 years. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011 Aug;43 (4):222–6. DOI: 10.1055/s‑0030–1267936
28. Babaei A, Safarinejad MR, Farrokhi F, Iran-Pour E. Penile reconstruction: evaluation of the most accepted techniques. Urol J. 2010; 7 (2): 71–78.
Review
For citations:
Kyzlasov P.S., Sokol'shchik M.M., Kazhera A.A., Zabelin M.V. HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF PHALLOPLASTY. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2017;4(3):86-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2017-4-3-8
Views:
2350
Email this article 