Patient satisfaction of a city multi-disciplinary hospital with medical care
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-4-12
Abstract
Aim. Medico-sociological study of patients' satisfaction with the activity of a large city multi-profile N. Pirogov Samara hospital.
Materials and methods. The results of the study of patients' satisfaction with a large multidisciplinary hospital in the city of Samara on the activities of the hospital in modern conditions are presented. During the medical and sociological survey, 474 patients were medically screened, the median age of which was 40 years. The sample size of the respondents was 50% of the patients in the hospital. The sample was randomly generated.
Results. In the age structure of the respondents (hospitalized patients), persons aged 30-45 and 18-29, who account for 30.4% and 29.5%, respectively, are predominant. Patients of the age category 46-59 years are slightly less — 21.5%, at the age of 60 and older — even less (18.6%). Two-thirds of the respondents (66.7%) indicate a satisfactory assessment of their financial situation, 43.9% of respondents indicate a satisfactory level of health status. Most patients (63.1%) are generally satisfied with the provision of medical care. A fairly low proportion of patients (less than 10%) who spent personal funds during inpatient treatment was noted. Against the background of a relatively high degree (more than 70%) of patients' satisfaction with the processes of diagnosis and treatment, there is a low satisfaction with the sanitary and hygienic conditions of inpatient stay (46.4%). Patients are more satisfied with the relationship with the average medical personnel (75.9%) than with the doctors (63.5%). The average assessment of the quality of the organization of medical care in the hospital was 3.88 on a five-point scale.
Conclusion. The main shortcomings in the quality of the organization of medical care were the low material and technical base of the hospital (according to 14.1% of patients), sanitary and hygienic problems (9.7%), claims to food quality (6.8%), shortages of medicines and consumables materials (5.7%). The results of the study of patients' satisfaction with the quality of the services provided reveal the factors that reduce patient satisfaction with medical care and highlight the main directions for its optimization.
About the Authors
S. A. SuslinRussian Federation
Sergey A. Suslin - MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, head of the Department of public health and health.
89 Chapaevskaya str., Samara 443099
Competing Interests:
No conflict of interest
A. V. Vavilov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr V. Vavilov - MD, PhD, director.
90 Polevaya str., Samara 443096
Competing Interests:
No conflict of interest
R. I. Ginnyatulina
Russian Federation
Rufiya I. Ginnyatulina - head of the Department of medical care quality expertise.
90 Polevaya str., Samara 443096
Competing Interests:
No conflict of interest
References
1. Reshetnikov AV, Efimenko SA, Astaf'ev LM. Metodika pro-vedeniya mediko-sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii [Methods of conducting medical and sociological research]. Мoscow: "GEO-TAR-MED" Publ.; 2003, 91 p.
2. Starodubov VI, Shchepin OP, Lindenbraten AL, Galanova GI. Metodologicheskie osnovy i mekhanizmy obespecheniya kachestva meditsinskoi pomoshchi [Methodological basis and mechanisms for ensuring the quality of care]. Мoscow: "Medit-sina" Publ.; 2001, 784 p.
3. Suslin SA, Fedoseeva LS, Nazarkina IM, Ginnyatulina RI. Organizational modeling of the work of the registry as an element of the quality management system of medical care. Glavvrach. 2017; 9: 47-54.
4. Donabedian, A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260 (12):1743-8.
5. Belyakin SA, Kazakova TV, Breskina TN, Azbarov AA, Kovaltchuk MM. The social psychological support of the system of quality management in medical organization. Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. 2011; 4: 26-30.
6. Birch K, Scrivens E, Field S. Quality in General Practice. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2000, 96 p.
7. Johnston DW. Measuring the quality of care. Texas Mod. 1988; 84 (1): 38-40.
8. Whetsell G. Total quality management. Health Prog. 1990 Oct;71 (8):16-9.
Review
For citations:
Suslin S.A., Vavilov A.V., Ginnyatulina R.I. Patient satisfaction of a city multi-disciplinary hospital with medical care. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2018;5(4):118-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-4-12