Our first experience of prepectoral reconstruction of the mammary gland using a mesh polypropylene implant
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2020-7-4-2
Abstract
Purpose of the study. To study the results of prepectoral reconstruction of the mammary gland after subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer with additional covering of the implant with a polypropylene mesh implant. (IPPBR)
Materials and methods. Case-series of 6 patients with luminal breast cancer T1–2N0M0 aged from 34 to 47 years. IPPBR was performed after subcutaneous mastectomy (nipple sparing in 2 cases). The anterior surface of implants (Polytech, Germany) was covered with Ethicon/Johnson& Johnson (USA) simple polypropylene mesh. The mesh was fixed with interrupted absorbable sutures to the big pectoral muscle.
Results. There was one successfully treated minor complication: limited skin incision necrosis. No other complications or tumor recurrences were registrated during observation period. The aesthetic results (mainly shape and volume breasts symmetry, nipples symmetry after nipple- sparing operation) were estimated as good both by surgeon and all patients. Periprosthetic connective tissue growth was minimal (grade I due to Baker’s scale) in all cases.
Conclusion. The first results of the use of a simple mesh polypropylene implant in cases of breast cancer after subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer for the prevention of implant migration are encouraging. The degree of development of periprosthetic scar contracture is minimal.About the Authors
D. N. Rovenskikh
Medical Сentre EvroMedClinica Plus; Novosibirsk National Research State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Denis N. Rovenskikh – Cand. Sci. (Med.), doctor-oncologist of the highest category, head of the oncological service
7\1 Dusi Kovalchuk str., Novosibirsk, 630001
2 Pirogova str., Novosibirsk, 630090
S. A. Usov
Novosibirsk Military Institute Named after General of the army I.K.Yakovlev of the National Guard of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stanislav A. Usov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor of the service and combat support of the national guard of the Russian Federation department
6/2 Klyuch-Kamyshenskoe Plato str., Novosibirsk, 630114
SPIN: 5788-2076
AuthorID: 914821
S. V. Petrosyants
Novosibirsk National Research State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Samvel V. Petrosyants – assistant of the department of fundamental medicine
2 Pirogova str., Novosibirsk, 630090
SPIN: 6170-2360
AuthorID: 888380
References
1. KL, Du L, Penson DF, Shyr Y, Hooks MA. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2895
2. Potter Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, Williamson PR, Whisker L, Thrush S, et al. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30781-2
3. Tasoulis M-K, Iqbal FM, Cawthorn S, MacNeill F, Vidya R. Subcutaneous implant breast reconstruction: Time to reconsider? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;43(9):1636–1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.04.008
4. Ter Louw RP, Nahabedian MY. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51S-59S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003942
5. Mirhaidari SJ, Azouz V, Wagner DS. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(3):263–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059
6. Sobti N, Weitzman RE, Nealon KP, Jimenez RB, Gfrerer L, Mattos D, et al. Evaluation of capsular contracture following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 24;10(1):1137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58094-4
7. Eichler C, Schulz C, Thangarajah F, Malter W, Warm M, Brunnert K. A Retrospective Head-to-head Comparison Between TiLoop Bra/TiMesh® and Seragyn® in 320 Cases of Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Anticancer Res. 2019 May;39(5):2599–2605. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13383
8. Chizh IA, Kolarkova VV, Semiglazov VV, Vinogradov IA, Telishevsky AV. Experience of Prepectoral Installation of Implants with Polyurethane Coating During Simultaneous Breast Reconstruction. In the Book: Materials of the IV St. Petersburg International Cancer Forum "White Nights 2018". Saint Petersburg, 05-08 July 2018, 12 p. (In Russian).
9. Open database: RosOncoWeb. Sobolevsky VA. Modern Trends in Breast Surgery. XXII Russian Cancer Congress. Moscow, November 13-15, 2018 Archive of speeches and publications. Available at: https://rosoncoweb.ru/events/2018/11/13/archive/. Accessed: 02.05.2020. (In Russian).
10. Malygin S.E., Kirillova E. L. Modern single-stage breast reconstruction with implants. The impact of new technical solutions and adjuvant radiation therapy on the results. Malignant tumor. 2018; 3(s1):17–21. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2018-8-3s1-17-21
11. Hernia Surge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22(1):1-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
12. Cano-Valderrama O, Porrero JL, Quirós E, Bonachia O, Castillo MJ, Cervantes N, et al. Is Onlay Polypropylene Mesh Repair an Available Option for Incisional Hernia Repair? A Retrospective Cohort Study. Am Surg. 2019 Feb 1;85(2):183–187.
13. Wu F, Zhang X, Liu Y, Cao D, Yu Y, Ma Y. Lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh for laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2020;24(1):31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02016-5
14. Safran T, Al-Halabi B, Viezel-Mathieu A, Boileau J-F, Dionisopoulos T. Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(4):686e–696e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006654
15. Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C. What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? An evidence-based review of the literature. Hernia. 2014 Aug;18(4):445–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1187-3
16. Spear SL, Baker JL. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Oct;96(5):1119–23; discussion 1124.
17. Open datebase: Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence (March 2009). Available at: https://www.cebm.net/2009/06/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/. Accessed: 02.05 2020.
Review
For citations:
Rovenskikh D.N., Usov S.A., Petrosyants S.V. Our first experience of prepectoral reconstruction of the mammary gland using a mesh polypropylene implant. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2020;7(4):19-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2020-7-4-2
Views:
1168
Email this article 