Attitude of patients and doctors of government health care system to the basic principles of medical ethics
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2021-8-1-10
Abstract
Currently, researchers face with various situations related to the moral situation in healthcare. This article is based on the results of a sociological reasearch conducted by specialists of the Krasnoyarsk Regional Center for Health and Medical Prevention in 2015–2019.Given the relevance of this topic, researchers compare the opinions of modern doctors and patients to ethical principles.
Purpose of the study. To study the attitude of modern doctors and patients of medical institutions to the classical norms of medical ethics.
Materials and methods. For the selection of respondents was used the representative sample based on gender and age of respondents (for the selection of patients), and by specialty of a medical workers (for doctors). Information collected by survey. Descriptive statistics were used to interpret the results, statistically significant differences between the rates were determined by Fischer`s exact test.
Results. The results indicate that there are statistically significant differences in the attitude of doctors and patients to some classic norms of medical ethics. In general, doctors often have an unambiguous opinion about the principles of bioethics; patients are more lenient about the principles of bioethics. However, sometimes patients are more categorical about some aspects of the principles of bioethics. In particular, these include the ambiguous opinions of doctors regarding the judgment that “if the doctor realizes that the patient has been harmed as a result of unlawful acts, he must report this to the internal affairs bodies”, as well as the opinions of doctors about the admissibility of accepting gifts from the patient.
Conclusions. The classical principles of bioethics preserve functionality and form the necessary attitude of doctors and patients to the ethical foundations of the doctor’s professional activities. Nevertheless, some aspects of these relationships are partially dysfunctional and can become a source of negative behavior in the system of relations between a doctor and a patient.
About the Authors
E. P. PukhovaRussian Federation
Elvira P. Pukhova – head of the health monitoring department
SPIN: 2292-1620, AuthorID: 1073916
33 Paris Commune str., Krasnoyarsk 660049
O. Yu. Kutumova
Russian Federation
Olga Yu. Kutumova – Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor, chief physician
SPIN: 1651-3197, AuthorID: 362823
33 Paris Commune str., Krasnoyarsk 660049
D. O. Trufanov
Russian Federation
Dmitry O. Trufanov – Cand. Sci. (Soc.), associate lecturer of the sociology department at the Institute of pedagogy, psychology and sociology; sociologist-consultant of the health monitoring department
SPIN: 2363-7434, AuthorID: 633198
33 Paris Commune str., Krasnoyarsk 660049
79 Svobodny ave., Krasnoyarsk 660041
References
1. Sergeeva NV, Kostenko OV. Bioethics as a philosophical reflection of medical culture. Proceedings of the Volgograd State Technical University. Series: Problems of Social and Humanitarian Knowledge. 2010;7:(7(67)):20–24. (In Russian).
2. Saperov VN. Cooperation with patients – guarantee of successful treatment. Clinical Medicine. 2016;94(7):554–559. (In Russian).
3. Rabtsun EA. Assessment of the relation of doctors and patients to development of business in medicine. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2009;8(4):157-161. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2009-4-157-161
4. Donika AD. Bioethics in the discourse of the sociology of medicine. International Journal of Experimental Education. 2016;(3-1):112. (In Russian).
5. Kazmina OO. A social aspect of bio-ethics. Sociological Research. 2011;(5(325)):110–113. (In Russian).
6. Mishatkina TV, Melnov SB, Tsyrdya TN. Social bioethics through the prism of global bioethics. Ed. by T.V.Mishatkina, S.B.Melnov. Minsk: IVC of the Ministry of Finance, 2018, 518 p. Available at: https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/234107
7. Nikulina MA. Urgency and prospects of sociological studying of bioethics. Modern Studies of Social Problems (Electronic Scientific Journal). 2012;(2):19. (In Russian).
8. The code of professional ethics of a doctor of the Russian Federation (adopted by the First National Congress of Doctors of the Russian Federation on 05.10.2012). Available at: https://nacmedpalata.ru/?action=show&id=11268
9. Nazarova I.N. "Doctor-patient" interrelation. legal and social aspects. Sociological research. 2004;7(243):142–147. (In Russian).
10. Shkarin VV, Ivasheva VV, Emeljanova OS. The relevance of the problem of patient safety from the point of view of practicing doctors. Bulletin of the Ivanovo Medical Academy. 2019;24(2):27–30. (In Russian).
11. Moroz IN. About the problems biomedical ethics and deontology: opinion of physicians. Medical Journal. 2019;(4(70)):91–95. (In Russian).
12. Artjuhov IP, Senchenko KA, Vinogradov KA. Doctor's attitude to informal payments. Siberian Medical Review. 2009;2(50):85–88. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Pukhova E.P., Kutumova O.Yu., Trufanov D.O. Attitude of patients and doctors of government health care system to the basic principles of medical ethics. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2021;8(1):97-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2021-8-1-10