Breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP-flap). History of development

The article is devoted to the actual topic of breast reconstruction with autologous tissues. The article discusses the key stages in the development of breast reconstructive surgery using free flaps using microsurgical techniques. A flap of the anterior abdominal wall, among other techniques, is the method of choice for breast reconstruction today, also because it allows you to achieve the most "natural" result. The authors compares different variants of autologous flaps, describes the advantages of the DIEP flap in comparison with the TRAM flap. Also, special attention is paid to the choice of breast reconstruction method depending on age, constitutional characteristics and the presence of risk factors such as smoking, diabetes mellitus and excess BMI. Analyzing the advantages of breast reconstruction with autograft flaps, the author concludes that there is a higher quality of life and improved outcomes in these patients than in patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction. Based on the literature review, it was found that breast reconstruction with the help of perforating flaps is still an area of innovation and constant progress: research in this area to date is mainly aimed at reducing the morbidity of the donor area and methods for isolating recipient vessels, shortening the rehabilitation period and developing reproducible reconstruction method.

1. Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Petrova GV. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2018 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow: P.A.Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, 2019, 44 p. Available at: https://glavonco.ru/cancer_register/Забол_2018_Электр.pdf. Accessed: 10.07.2021

2. Merino Bonilla JA, Torres Tabanera M, Ros Mendoza LH. Breast cancer in the 21st century: from early detection to new therapies. Radiologia. 2017 Oct;59(5):368–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2017.06.003

3. Suzdaltsev IV, Blokhin SN, Nadein KV. Reconstructive plastic surgery after radical treatment of breast cancer Medical Bulletin of the North Caucasus. 2012;(3):105–110.

4. Borovikov AM. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy. M.: "Provincial medicine" 2000, 287 p. Available at: https:// rusneb.ru/catalog/004796_000040_TVERS-RU///TOUNB/// EKOLD///5-8376-0014-0/. Accessed: 05.07.2021

5. Tansini I. Sopra il mio processo di amputazione della mammella. Gazz Med Ital 1906;57:141. Available at: https://www. scienceopen.com/document?vid=f7f92290-2c3b-451e-b501- dca7a59f083e. Accessed: 12.07.2021

6. Olivari N. The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1976 Apr;29(2):126– 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(76)90036-9

7. Holmstrom H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;13(3):423–427. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317909013092

8. Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982 Feb;69(2):216–225. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198202000-00006

9. Eisenmann-Klein M, Neihann-Lorenz K. Plastic and aesthetic surgery: recent achievements. Translated from English, edited by A.M.Borovikov. Moscow: Practical Medicine, 2011, 446 p.

10. Buck DW, Fine NA. The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Oct;124(4):1047–1054. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b457b2

11. Nahabedian M, Neligan P. Plastic surgery 4th edition. Elsevier; 2017, 576 p. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/books/ plastic-surgery/nahabedian/978-0-323-35709-8. Accessed: 12.07.2021

12. Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994 Jan;32(1):32–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199401000-00007

13. Blondeel PN. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Mar;52(2):104–111. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1998.3033

14. Tan MG, Isaranuwatchai W, DeLyzer T, Butler K, Hofer SOP, O’Neill AC, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MSTRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;119(3):388–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25325

15. Ludolph I, Horch RE, Harlander M, Arkudas A, Bach AD, Kneser U, et al. Is there a Rationale for Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Older Patients? A Retrospective Single Center Analysis of Quality of life, Complications and Comorbidities after DIEP or ms-TRAM Flap Using the BREAST-Q. Breast J. 2015 Dec;21(6):588–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12493

16. American Cancer Society, Surveillance Research. Cancer Facts & Figures, 2019, 76 p. Avaliable at: https://www. cancertutor.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/cancer-factsand-figures-2019.pdf. Accessed: 15.06.2021

17. Ng SK, Hare RM, Kuang RJ, Smith KM, Brown BJ, Hunter-Smith DJ. Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy: Patient Satisfaction and Decision Making. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76(6):640–644. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000242

18. Boughey JC, Attai DJ, Chen SL, Cody HS, Dietz JR, Feldman SM, et al. Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Data on CPM Outcomes and Risks. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3100–3105. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5443-5

19. Leyngold MM. Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap? Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6S Suppl 6):S418–S420. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001319

20. Seidenstuecker K, van Waes C, Munder BI, Claes KEY, Witzel C, Roche N, et al. DIEAP flap for safe definitive autologous breast reconstruction. Breast. 2016 Apr;26:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2015.12.005

21. Saint-Cyr M, Chang DW, Robb GL, Chevray PM. Internal mammary perforator recipient vessels for breast reconstruction using free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7):1769–1773. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000287132.35433.d6

22. Jeong W, Lee S, Kim J. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Breast. 2018 Apr;38:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.003

23. Grünherz L, Keijzer W, Uyulmaz S, Fertsch S, Imhof L, Käser S, et al. Donor site aesthetics and morbidity after DIEP flap breast reconstruction-A retrospective multicenter study. Breast J. 2020 Oct;26(10):1980–1986. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14003

24. Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R, Salem B, Gay A, Abrahamse P, et al. Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. Plastic surgeons: results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May;127(5):1796–1803. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf183

25. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, Kuhn L, Hawley ST, Wilkins E, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2

26. Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, Papsdorf M, Lennox PA, Hazen A, et al. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):758–771. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000479932.11170.8f

27. Pusic AL, Matros E, Fine N, Buchel E, Gordillo GM, Hamill JB, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;35(22):2499–2506. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9561