FEATURES HIP ARTHROPLASTY AFTER REDUCTIONRECONSTRUCTIVE INTERVENTIONS OF PROXIMAL FEMUR

Abstract:

Surgical treatment of destructive and degenerative diseases of the hip arthroplasty technology with the modern development of science, technology and medicine is considered the most effective method of providing social and personal reintegration. However, the opinion of experts, arthroplasty increases the complication rate in patients after osteosynthesis and osteotomy of the proximal femur. The purpose of research - to compare patient outcomes Technology hip arthroplasty after-reducing reconstructive interventions at the proximal femur. Material and Methods: The study group comprised 42 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty after-reducing reconstructive interventions at the proximal femur. The control group consisted of 43 patients with idiopathic hip osteoarthritis who underwent primary arthroplasty. Results: conducting joint replacement in patients of the main group was accompanied by an increase in the frequency of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Therefore, this group of patients requires a special approach to diagnosis and treatment.

1. Khamid A.Sh., Bilyalova A.R., Gil’manov G.Z., Minasov B.Sh. Psikhoemotsional’nyi status i kachestvo zhizni bol’nykh pozvonochno-spinomozgovoi travmoi. Vestnik vosstanovitel’noi meditsiny. 2007; 2: 72-74. (Russian)

2. Akhtyamov I.F., Guryleva M.E., YuosefA.I. i dr. Analiz izmenenii kachestva zhizni patsientov, perenesshikh endoprotezirovanie tazobedrennogo sustava. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2007; 2(44): 89-93. (Russian)

3. Zorya V.I., Genetetskii S. F., Gur’ev V.V. K voprosu o total’nom endoprotezirovanii povrezhdenii tazobedrennogo sustava u lits starcheskogo vozrasta. Byulleten’ Vostochno-Sibirskogo nauchnogo tsentra SO RAMN. 2006; 4: 117-122. (Russian)

4. Sergeev S.V., Pirozhkova T.A., Bekman V.E. Otsenka effektivnosti endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava s tochki zreniya mediko-sotsial’noi ekspertizy. Mediko-sotsial’naya ekspertiza I reabilitatsiya. 2003; 1: 18-19. (Russian)

5. Zagorodnii N.V., Nuzhdin V.I., Bukhtin K.M., Kagramanov S.V. Rezul’taty primeneniya monolitnykh i modul’nykh bedrennykh komponentov pri revizionnom endoprotezirovanii tazobedrennogo sustava. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im. N.N. Priorova: 2013; 1: 18-26. (Russian)

6. Minasov B.Sh., Shuster L.Sh., Yakupov R.R. Tribologicheskie kharakteristiki razlichnykh par treniya pri artroplastike krupnykh sustavov. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2013; 8(6): 158-161. (Russian)

7. Skoroglyadov A.B., Blinov A.B., Orlov A.B. Endoprotezirovanie pri zabolevaniyakh i posledstviyakh travm tazobedrennogo sustava. Vestnik rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: meditsina. 2002; 2: 94-95. (Russian)

8. Leuchte S., Riedl K., Wohlrab D. Immediate post-operative advantages of minimally invasive hip replacement-results of symmetry and load from the measurement of ground reaction force. Z. Orthop. Unfall. 2009; 147(1):69-78.

9. Srivastav S., Mittal V., Agarwal S. Total hip arthroplasty following failed fixation of proximal hip fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2008; 42(3): 279-86.

10. Bonnevialle P., Saragaglia D., Ehlinger M., et al. Trochanteric locking nail versus arthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fracture in patients aged over 75 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(6): 95-100.

11. Gjertsen J E, Vinje T, Engesaeter L B, et al. Internal Screw Fixation Compared with Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(3): 619-28.

12. Holt G., Hook S., Hubble M. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants. Int. Orthop. 2011; 35 (2): 267-73.

13. Bliznyukov V.V., Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I. i dr. Endoprotezirovanie tazobedrennogo sustava u patsientov so slozhnoi deformatsiei bedrennoi kosti posle operativnogo lecheniya displazii. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2014; 4 (74): 5 - 15. (Russian)

14. Voloshin V.P., Eremin A.V., Onoprienko G.A. i dr. Dvukhetapnoe total’noe zameshchenie tazobedrennykh sustavov v usloviyakh glubokoi periproteznoi infektsii. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii im. N.N. Priorova. 2012; 4: 3-9. (Russian)

15. Volokitina E.A., Zaitseva O. P., Kolotygin D. A., Vishnyakov A. A. Lokal’nye intraoperatsionnye i rannie posleoperatsionnye oslozhneniya endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava. Genii Ortopedii. 2009; 3: 71-77. (Russian)

16. Prokhorenko V.M., Mashkov V.M., Mamedov A.A., Dolgopolov V.V. Osobennosti revizionnogo endoprotezirovaniya tazobedrennogo sustava pri prolabirovanii vertluzhnogo komponenta v polost’ malogo taza. Byulleten’ Vostochno-Sibirskogo nauchnogo tsentra SO RAMN. 2013; 6: 49-58. (Russian)

17. Srivastav S., Mittal V., Agarwal S. Total hip arthroplasty following failed fixation of proximal hip fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42(3):279-86.

18.