NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH UROLITHIASIS IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-3-25-29
Abstract
Abstract:
Objective: To determine the most frequent causative agents of nosocomial infection in patients with urolithiasis in the postoperative period.
Material and Methods. The study is based on the results of comprehensive studies conducted in 122 patients with nosocomial urinary tract infection, detected in 823 patients with urolithiasis treated by various methods. A cohort of 823 patients is isolated from 2688 patients treated without at admission signs of infections in the urinary tract for the period 2011–2014. All patients were treated at the Urological department of Avicenna Tajik State Medical University in the Republican Clinical Center of Urology. Main results. By the method of randomly selected 823 medical records of patients with urolithiasis various operations we carried out with 122 patients revealed cases of nosocomial infections. The diagnosis of nosocomial infections on the basis of established symptomatic urinary tract infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria or the presence of wound infection, use during the hospital stay for treatment of antibiotics, antiseptics, physiotherapy and other therapies. The incidence of nosocomial infections was studied in dependence with the severity of the underlying disease, the volume of surgical, invasive, endoscopic and other urological procedures, the timing and frequency of tests, the proportion of individual clinical manifestations in the overall structure of urinary tract infections, sex and age of patients.
Conclusions. The leading microflora causing nosocomial infection in patients with urolithiasis in all treatments are gram-negative microorganisms, including prevailing E.coli (24,0%).
About the Author
F. S. SadulloevTajikistan
postgraduate of Urological department of Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
References
1. Usmanova G. M. Puti sovershenstvovaniya sanitarno-protivoepidemicheskogo nadzora i meropriyatiya po profilaktike vnutribol’nichnykh infektsii v rodovspomogatel’nykh uchrezhdeniyakh: avtoref. dis… kand. med. nauk/Dushanbe. 2002. (Russian)
2. Dvoretskii L. I. Pozhiloi bol’noi i infektsii. Infektsii i antimikrobnaya terapiya. 2002; 4 (4): 180–187. (Russian)
3. Akilov F. A., Mukhtarov Sh. T., Giyasov Sh. I. i dr. Posleoperatsionnye infektsionno-vospalitel’nye oslozhneniya endoskopicheskikh operatsii po povodu urolitiaza. Urologiya. 2013; 1: 89–91. (Russian)
4. Grady R., Krieger J. Urinary tract infection in childhood. Current Opinion in Urology. 2001; 11: 61–65.
5. Lindsay E. Nicolle Urinary tract in geriatric and institutionalized patients. Current Opinion in Urology. 2002; 12: 51–55.
6. V. Kremery, et al. Intraabdominal infections treated with cefaperasone/sulbactam. 4‑th Eur. Cong. Chemother. Paris. 2002. p. 268–271.
7. Reddy S. T., Chung K. K., McDaniel C. J., et al. Micropatterned surfaces for reducing the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an in vitro study on the effect of sharklet micropatterned surfces to inhibit bacterial colonization and migration of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Journal of endourology. 2011; 25 (9): 1547–1552. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0611.
8. Rumyantsev V. B., Safarov P. M., Filatov I. V. Opasnost’ vnutribol’nichnoi infektsii pri khirurgicheskom lechenii mochekamennoi bolezni. V kn.: Oshibki, opasnosti i oslozhneniya v diagnostike i lechenii urologicheskikh zabolevanii. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Moskva, 2001. (Russian)
9. Dzeranov N. K. Infektsiya mochevyvodyashchikh putei u patsientov s krupnymi i korallovidnymi kamnyami.//Materialy XII s»ezda Rossiiskogo obshchestva urologov. Moskva, 2012. s. 130–131. (Russian)
10. Daburov K. N., Sa»dulloev F. S., Nusratulloev I. N. Osobennosti mikrobnogo obsemeneniya v otdeleniyakh urologicheskogo statsionara s sovershenstvovaniem mer po ikh snizheniyu.//Sb. trudov KhI konferentsii molodykh uchenykh-medikov stran SNG. Almaty. 2011.s. 20–23. (Russian)
11. Daburov K. N., Sa»dulloev F. S., Nusratulloev I. N. Epidemiologiya vnutribol’nichnykh infektsii v urologicheskom statsionare.// Mat. s»ezda urologov Kazakhstana i Evraziiskogo andrologicheskogo kongressa. Almaty. 2010.s. 88–89. (Russian)
12. Zaitsev A. V., Pushkar’ D.Yu., Godunov B. N., D’yakov V. V. Sovremennye tendentsii v profilaktike i lechenie nozokomial’noi infektsii v urologii. Farmateka. 2005; 100 (4–5): 116. (Russian)
13. Bouza E., San Juan R., Munoz P. European perspective on nosocomial urinary tract infections II. Report on incidence, clinical characteristics and outcome (ESGNI‑004 study). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2001;.7 (10): 532–542.
14. Kalsi J., Arya M., Wilson P., Mundy A. Hospital-acquired urinary tract infection. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2003; 57 (5):388–391.
15. Pushkarev A. M. Faktory razvitiya gospital’noi infektsii mochevykh putei v posleoperatsionnom periode. Zdravookhranenie Bashkortostana. 2001; 5: 118–122. (Russian)
Review
For citations:
Sadulloev F.S. NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH UROLITHIASIS IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2015;2(3):25-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-3-25-29