COMPARATIVE INDICATORS OF THE PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT OF BOYS IN REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN IN THE VARIOUS ECO-GEOGRAPHICAL ZONES
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-3-30-34
Abstract
Abstract:
Purpose. The examination of the comparative aspect of the physical parameters of the boys in the pre - and puberty in different ecological zones (EZ) of the Republic of Dagestan (RD): mountain, foothills and plains of the taxiway.
Materials and Methods. The study in 3 eco-geographic zones of the Republic of Dagestan in 2641 a boy aged 11 to 17 years. Inclusion criteria were: age of onset of puberty and the completion of 11-17 years, male gender and residence in the territory (extragenital diseases). We compared the following anthropometric indicators: height, weight, body mass index.
Results and conclusions. The analysing of the physical parameters of development in different areas of extragenital diseases RD identifies the following pattern: the lowest height and weight were boys living in the foothills of the taxiway. Their peers living in highland and lowland extragenital diseases taxiway growth were similar and statistically significant differences were found statistically significant differences are particularly evident with 13-14 years in boys from foothills of RD, especially when compared with their peers plain COPIES. Thus, the overall physical development of boys RD closes to those boys Russia, although the tendency to reduce them was determined. Comparative physical development of boys in various extragenital diseases RD, the worst performance demonstrated teenagers from foothill extragenital diseases.
About the Authors
K. G. KamalovRussian Federation
PhD, associate professor, department of endocrinology, DSMA
E. M-R. Soltakhanov
Russian Federation
PhD, assistant, department of endocrinology, DSMA
S. A. Abusuev
Russian Federation
MD, professor, head of department of endocrinology, DSMA, honorary doctor of Russia and Dagestan, honored scientist, director of the Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
G. A. Gazimagomedov
Russian Federation
MD., associate professor, department of urology, DSMA
References
1. Kuchma V.R., Sukhareva L.M. Sostoyanie zdorov’ya i meditsinskoe obsledovanie podrostkov Rossiiskoi federatsii. Vestnik RAMN. 2003; 8: 6-10. (Russian)
2. Baranov A.A. Profilakticheskie tekhnologii v pediatrii: nauchnye i prakticheskie problemy. Pediatriya. 2003; 5: 4-7. (Russian)
3. Baranov A.A., Shcheplyagina L.A., Il’in A.G., Kuchma V.R. Sostoyanie zdorov’ya detei kak faktor natsional’noi bezopasnosti. Ros pediat zhurn 2005; 2:4-8. (Russian)
4. Baranov A.A., Kuchma V.R., Tutel’yan V.A. i dr. Novye vozmozhnosti profilakticheskoi meditsiny v reshenii problem zdorov’ya detei i podrostkov. Kompleksnaya programma nauchnykh issledovanii «Profilaktika naibolee rasprostranennykh boleznei detei i podrostkov na 2005-2009g.g.».M: GEOTAR – Media, 2006. (Russian)
5. Vasil’chenko G.S. Zaderzhka i disgarmoniya pubertatnogo razvitiya. Chastnaya seksopatologiya (Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei). M.1983. (Russian)
6. Velichkovskii B.T. Meditsinskie i sotsial’nye prioritety okhrany zdorov’ya naseleniya Rossii / Sovremennye problemy profilakticheskoi meditsiny, sredy obitaniya i zdorov’ya naseleniya promyshlennykh regionov Rossii: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Ekaterinburg. 2004. (Russian)
7. Richter J. Conspicuous changes in the developmental course of Goerlitz children and adolescents. Arrt.Jugend.1986; 77(1): 31-37.
8. Richter, J. // Simposium of European Union for School and University Health and Medicine: Abstracts.Budapest. 1985. p.12-13.
9. Krukovich E.V., Luchaninova V.N., Nagirnaya L.N. i dr Dinamika fizicheskogo razvitiya detei g.Vladivostoka. Pediatriya. 2004; 6: 89-95. (Russian)
10. Plyaskina I.V. Zdorov’e sovremennykh shkol’nikov //Detskoe zdravookhranenie Rossii: strategii razvitiya. Materialy IXs»ezda pediatrov Rossii. M. – 19-23 fevralya 2001g. s.461. (Russian)
11. Kapitonov V.F. Geneticheskii podkhod v otsenke kharakteristiki rosta i razvitiya rebenka. Pediatriya. 2005; 3: 58-60. (Russian)
12. Medik V.A., Kotova T.E., Sechenova L.V. Osobennosti sostoyaniya zdorov’ya detei (po rezul’tatam Vserossiiskoi dispanserizatsii). Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2004; 2: 46-49. (Russian)
13. Yampol’skaya Yu.A. Otsenka fizicheskogo razvitiya shkol’nikov Moskvy v poslednie desyatiletiya. Vestnik RAMN.2003; 8: 10-11. (Russian)
14. Sautkin M.F., Stuneeva G.I. Dinamika fizicheskogo razvitiya shkol’nikov g.Ryazani za poslednyuyu chetvert’ XX stoletiya. Pediatriya. – 2006; 2: 95-97. (Russian)
15. Shcheplyagina L.A. Zakonomernosti formirovaniya rosta i razvitiya zdorovogo rebenka. Rossiiskii pediatricheskii zhurnal. 2003; 6: 4-9. (Russian)
16. Bell W. Body size and shape: a longitudinal investigation of active and sedentary boys during adolescence. J. of Sports Sciences. 1993; 2:127-138.
17. Yur’ev V.V., Simikhodskii A.S., Voronovich N.N., Khomich M.M. Rost i razvitie rebenka (kratkii spravochnik). S.-Pb.: Izd-vo «Piter »; 2009. s.37-42. (Russian)
Review
For citations:
Kamalov K.G., Soltakhanov E.M., Abusuev S.A., Gazimagomedov G.A. COMPARATIVE INDICATORS OF THE PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT OF BOYS IN REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN IN THE VARIOUS ECO-GEOGRAPHICAL ZONES. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2015;2(3):30-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-3-30-34