Preview

Research and Practical Medicine Journal

Advanced search

COMBINED TREATMENT OF LOCALLY-ADVANCED BLADDER CANCER

https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-4-28-34

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is an important clinical and scientific challenge. In 2013, in Russia, the absolute number of patients with first-ever diagnosis of bladder cancer was 12 992 people. There is an increasing proportion of detection of bladder cancer stage I–II disease patterns: 2003–50.8% in 2013–69.6%, while the number of newly diagnosed patients in III and IV clinical stages remains at 30%. The proportion of individuals who completed the treatment of the number of newly diagnosed patients with bladder cancer in 2013, was as follows: only surgical method — 65.4%, 33.5% combined. 

Purpose. Improvement of the results of treatment of patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. 

Materials and methods. The main treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy. In the combined treatment of bladder cancer chemotherapy is the component that systemic exposure to the tumor, the way of regional and distant metastases. The study included 132 patients with locally advanced bladder cancer who were treated for 2005–2013, divided into four groups: NACT + CE — 27 people (20.5%), CE + ACT — 21 (15.9%), NACT + CE + ACT — 21 (15.9%) only CE — 63 (47.7%). An important component of treatment has been the use of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) in Schemes M–VAC and GP. An objective response is possible in 44.7%, and the stabilization process in 40.4% of patients.

Results. The clinical effect is evaluated in all patients. In the group of NACT 21% of patients survived for more than 4 years, but did not survive the 5‑year mark. In the group of CE + ACT the indicator achieved only 3‑year survival rate, which amounted to 43%. In the group of CE — none of the patients did not live up to 3 years, with 2‑year survival rate was 30%. In the group of ACT + NCT + CE 3 patients (15%) were alive at the time, passed the threshold of the 5‑year survival rate, there is no progression of cancer.

Conclusion. Combined treatment mode NACT + CE + ACT can achieve significantly longer time to tumor progression and better overall survival; the reverse side is to increase the frequency of postoperative complications.

About the Authors

I. V. Chernyshev
FSBO «Unitid policlinics and hospital» of Administration of the President of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia) Michurinskiy prospect 6, Moscow, 119285, Russia
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, head of urological department of FSBO «Unitid policlinics and hospital» of Administration of the President of the Russian Federation


Y. V. Samsonov
P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia) 2nd Botkinskiy proezd 3, Moscow, 125284, Russia
Russian Federation
PhD, leading researcher of P. A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation


D. V. Perepechin
N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia) 3rd Parkovaya ulitsa 51/4, Moscow, 105425, Russia
Russian Federation
PhD, senior researcher of division of oncourology, N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation


A. M. Ulbashev
SBEO «OD» Of Ministry of Health of Kabardino-Balkar Republic (Nalchik, Russia)
ul. Lermontova 23, Kabardino-Balkar Republic, Nalchik, 360000, Russia
Russian Federation
PhD, oncourologist of SBEO «OD» Of Ministry of Health of Kabardino-Balkar Republic


References

1. Alekseev B.Ya., Kaprin A. D., Vorob’ev N. V., Golovashchenko M. P., Nyushko K. M., Kalpinskii A. S. Photodynamic therapy in patients with non-muscle-invasive cancer of the urinary bladder. Urology and Andrology. 2013; 2 (4): 28–35. (Russian).

2. Alekseev B.Ya., Golovashchenko M. P., Teplov A. A., Filonenko E. V., Nyushko K. M., Kalpinskiy A. S., Andreeva Y. Y., Ponkratov A. A., Pirogov A. V. New combined method of adjuvant treatment in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ural’skii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2012; 3: 29–35. (Russian).

3. Sostoyanie onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2013 godu. A. D. Kaprin, V. V. Starinskii, G. V. Petrova (Ed). Moscow: FGBU «MNIOI im. P. A. Gertsena» Minzdrava Rossii, 2014. (Russian).

4. Syed M., Weiss G. R. Management of locally advanced bladder cancer: early vs deferred chemotherapy. World Journal of Urology. 2002; 20 (3): 175–182.

5. Sobin L. H., Gospodariwicz M., Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. UICC International Union Against Cancer. 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell. 2009. pp. 262–265 Available at: http://www.uicc.org/tnm/(accessed: 16.11.2010).

6. Stein J. P., Skinner D. G. Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of a standard procedure. World Journal of Urology. 2006; 24 (3): 296–304.

7. Vale C. L. Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data advanced bladder cancer (ABC) meta-analysis collaboration. European Urology. 2005; 48 (2): 202–206.

8. Vale C. L. Advanced bladder cancer meta-analysis collaboration: neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003; 361 (9373): 1927–1934.

9. Karyakin O. B. Recommendations on muscular non-invasive bladder carcinoma. Onkourologiya. 2007; 3: 32–35.

10. Karyakin O. B., Popov A. M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer: the pros and cons. Onkourologiya. 2006; 2: 31–34. (Russian).

11. Lopatkin N. A. Operativnoe lechenie opukholei mochevogo puzyrya. Materialy plenuma Vserossiiskogo obshchestva urologov 14–16 Jun. Kemerovo, 1995. (Russian).

12. Chernyshev I. V. Optimizatsiya podkhodov diagnostiki i lecheniya raka mochevogo puzyrya: Diss. … dok. med. nauk: 14.00.14./FGU «NII Urologii» MZ RF. Moscow, 2004. (Russian).

13. Garin A. M., Bazin I. S. Spravochnoe rukovodstvo po lekarstvennoi terapii solidnykh opukholei. Moscow: “CheRo” Publ., 2007. (Russian).

14. Matveev B. P. Klinicheskaya onkourologiya. Moscow: “ABVpress” Publ., 2011. (Russian).

15. Rusakov I. G., Bolotina L. V., Teplov A. A. Variant kombinirovannogo lecheniya invazivnogo raka mochevogo puzyrya s ispol’zovaniem neoad’yuvantnoi khimioterapii. Moscow: FGU «MNIOI im. P. A. Gertsena Roszdrava». 2006. (Russian).

16. Millikan R., Dinney C., Swanson D., Ro J. Y., Smith T. L., Williams D., Logothetis C. Integrated therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer: final report of a randomized trial of cyctectomy plus adjuvant M–VAC vs cyctectomy with both preoperative and postoperative M–VAC. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19 (20): 4005–4013.

17. Sherif A., Holmberg L., Rintala E. et al. Neoadjuvant cisplatinum based combination chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer: a combined analysis of two Nordic studies. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 2004; 45 (3): 297–303.

18. Von der Maase, Hansen S., Roberts J. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin in advanced bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase 3 study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000; 17 (17): 3068–3077.

19. Bartelink H. International collaboration of realists’ on behalf of the medical research council advanced bladder cancer working party: neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a randonized controlled trial. Lancet. 1999; 6 (354): 533–540.

20. Borden L. S., Clark Р. Е., Hall M. C. Bladder Cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2003; 15 (3): 227–233.

21. Kuczyk M. A., Anastasiadis A. G., Zimmermann R. et al. Chemotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer. European Urology. 2004; 3: 79–88.


Review

For citations:


Chernyshev I.V., Samsonov Y.V., Perepechin D.V., Ulbashev A.M. COMBINED TREATMENT OF LOCALLY-ADVANCED BLADDER CANCER. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2015;2(4):28-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-4-28-34

Views: 1519


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-1893 (Online)