Intraoperative indocyanine green lymphography during lymph node dissection in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases
https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2026-13-1-2
EDN: BKHIPW
Abstract
Patients and methods. The study included 55 patients with CLM who underwent intraoperative fluorescence lymphography with indocyanine green (ICG) during laparotomy to guide hepatic hilum lymph node dissection (LND) and liver resection. The first three fluorescent lymph nodes (LNs), defined as sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), were identified within 30–45 minutes after peritumoral ICG injection. LND was performed with excision and labeling of SLNs and all fluorescent LNs detected during the observation period, as well as lymph nodes from stations 12, 13, and 8, regardless of fluorescence. Liver resection was subsequently performed.
Results. In six of 55 patients (10.9 %), no SLNs were visualized. These patients underwent LND with removal of lymph nodes from stations 12, 8, and 13; histopathological examination revealed no LN metastases in this subgroup. In the remaining patients (89.1 %, n = 49), SLN fluorescence was observed. Histopathological analysis demonstrated lymphogenous metastases in 11 of 55 patients (20.0 %). In four of these 11 patients (36.3 %), selective LND based solely on preoperative imaging and intraoperative assessment would have failed to identify and remove metastatic LNs. The sensitivity of ICG lymphography was 100 %: in all 11 patients with nodal metastases, at least one SLN (SLN No1, No2, or No3) was involved. In two cases (18.2 %), metastatic involvement was detected only in SLN No3, with SLN No1 and SLN No2 being negative. Only one of the 11 patients (9.1 %) had additional metastatic LNs beyond the SLN basin; in this patient, all three SLNs were metastatic.
Conclusion. Hepatic hilum LN metastases were detected in one in five patients with CLM. Reliable preoperative or intraoperative identification of metastatic hilar LNs remains challenging. ICG-guided SLN mapping enables more precise lymph node dissection. Further studies are required to determine whether this approach improves long-term oncological outcomes after liver resection for CLM.
About the Authors
A. V. KorshakN. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Moscow, Russian Federation
Alina V. Korshak – MD, Oncologist, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 2 (tumors of the hepatopancreatobiliary zone), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8236-2808 Scopus Author ID: 58681896200
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
D. V. Podluzhnyi
A.Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre
Obninsk, Russian Federation
Danil V. Podluzhny – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), oncologist, Abdominal Department, A.Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre, Obninsk, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-3378 eLibrary SPIN: 3537-3436, AuthorID: 583879 Scopus Author ID: 56801896900
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
A. G. Kotelnikov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Moscow, Russian Federation
Alexey G. Kotelnikov – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Leading Researcher of the Department of abdominal oncology No. 2 (tumors of the hepatopancreatobiliary zone), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-0549 eLibrary SPIN: 8710-4003, AuthorID: 105352 Scopus Author ID: 7005528750
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
V. I. Egorov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation;
Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russian Federation;
Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary named after Profess or M.Z. Sigal, Kazan, Russian Federation
Vasiliy I. Egorov – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant of the Department of Oncology, Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Therapy, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russian Federation; MD, Oncologist, Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary named after Professor M.Z. Sigal, Kazan, Russian Federation; Postgraduate Researcher (Applicant), Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 2, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-1390 eLibrary SPIN: 7794-4210, AuthorID: 829829 Scopus Author ID: 7202505136
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
M G. Abgaryan
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Moscow, Russian Federation
Mikael G. Abgaryan – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Senior Research Fellow, Medical Oncologist, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 1, N.N. Trapeznikov Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8893-1894 eLibrary SPIN: 1821-6900, AuthorID: 601950 Scopus Author ID: 57193874192
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
M. V. Batalova
V. M. Buyanov City Clinical Hospital
Moscow, Russian Federation
Maria V. Batalova – Cand. Sci. (Medicine), radiologist of the Diagnostic Radiology Department, Buyanov City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
G. G. Makiev
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Moscow, Russian Federation
Georgii G. Makiev – MD, Oncologist, PhD Student, Department of Anticancer Drug Therapy No. 2, Division of Drug Treatment Methods, N.N. Trapeznikov Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9732-4033 eLibrary SPIN: 5068-0705, AuthorID: 999008 Scopus Author ID: 59202759300
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
A. A. Tryakin
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Moscow, Russian Federation
Alexey A. Tryakin – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Deputy Director for Research, N.N. Trapeznikov Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, Head of the Department of Anticancer Drug Therapy No. 2, Division of Drug Treatment Methods, N.N. Trapeznikov Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2245-214X eLibrary SPIN: 7708-5775, AuthorID: 122803 Scopus Author ID: 6505503514 WoS ResearcherID: E-6094-2015
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
D. M. Kantieva
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Moscow, Russian Federation
Dayana M. Kantieva – MD, Interventional Radiologist, Department of Endovascular Diagnosis and Treatment, Division of Interventional Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Radiology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3953-0036 Scopus Author ID: 57216418049 WoS ResearcherID: GLV-5759-2022
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
M. Sh. Manukyan
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Moscow, Russian Federation
Mariam Sh. Manukyan – MD, Oncologist, Research Fellow, Department of Anticancer Drug Therapy No. 2, Division of Drug Treatment Methods, N.N. Trapeznikov Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-4872, eLibrary SPIN: 1546-6035 AuthorID: 1160450
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
A. N. Polyakov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Moscow, Russian Federation
Alexander N. Polyakov – Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Senior Researcher, Department of Abdominal Oncology No. 2 (tumors of the hepatopancreatobiliary zone, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-5011 eLibrary SPIN: 9924-0256, AuthorID: 764535 Scopus Author ID: 57190413973 WoS ResearcherID: ABB-8912-2021
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
References
1. Horn SR, Stoltzfus KC, Lehrer EJ, Dawson LA, Tchelebi L, Gusani NJ, Sharma NK, Chen H, Trifiletti DM, Zaorsky NG. Epidemiology of liver metastases. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;67:101760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2020.101760
2. Sawada Y, Sahara K, Endo I, Sakamoto K, Honda G, Beppu T, et al. Long-term outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases in the presence of extrahepatic disease: A multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Nov;27(11):810–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.810
3. Rau C, Blanc B, Ronot M, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Faivre S, et al. Neither preoperative computed tomography nor intra-operative examination can predict metastatic lymph node in the hepatic pedicle in patients with colorectal liver metastasis. Ann SurgOncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):163–168. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1994-7
4. Hess GF, Aegerter NLE, Zeindler J, Vosbeck J, Neuschütz KJ, Müller PC, et al. Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes after Systematic Perihilar Lymphadenectomy in Colorectal Liver Metastases. J ClinMed. 2024 Sep 6;13(17):5301. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175301
5. August DA, Sugarbaker PH, Schneider PD. Lymphatic dissemination of hepatic metastases. Implications for the follow-up and treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1985 Apr 1;55(7):1490–1494. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19850401)55:7<1490::aid-cncr2820550712>3.0.co;2-n
6. Adam R, de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Vibert E, Salloum C, Azoulay D, Castaing D. Concomitant extrahepatic disease in patients with colorectal liver metastases: when is there a place for surgery? AnnSurg. 2011;253(2):349–359. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318207bf2c
7. Wakai T, Shirai Y, Sakata J, Nagahashi M, Kaneko K, Hatakeyama K. Hepatic lymph node dissection provides a survival benefit for patients with nodal disease of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):186–190.
8. Patiutko IuI, Pylev AL, Sagaĭdak IV, Poliakov AN, Chuchuev ES, Abgarian MG, Shishkina NA. Surgical and combined treatment of patients with metastatic liver and lymph nodes invasion by colorectal cancer. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2010;(7):49–54. (In Russ.)
9. Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, Arnold D, Normanno N, Taïeb J, et al.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@ esmo.org. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. AnnOncol. 2023 Jan;34(1):10–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003
10. Mahuron KM, Hernandez MC, Wong P, Fan D, Ituarte PHG, Raoof M, et al. Liver Resection With Extrahepatic Disease: A Population-Based Analysis of Thoughtful Selection. J SurgOncol. 2025 Mar;131(3):443–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27944
11. Viganò L, Lopci E, Costa G, Rodari M, Poretti D, Pedicini V, et al. Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Patients with Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastases: Impact on Restaging and Treatment Planning. Ann SurgOncol. 2017 Apr;24(4):1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5644-y
12. Pindak D, Pavlendova J, Tomas M, Dolnik J, Duchon R, Pechan J. Selective versus routine lymphadenectomy in the treatment of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0233-y
13. Tikhonovskaya MN, Shevchuk AS. Sentinel lymph node detection in early-stage ovarian cancer: primary results and perspectives. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2025;24(4):20–28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2025-24-4-20-28
14. Ngô C, Sharifzadehgan S, Lecurieux-Lafayette C, Belhouari H, Rousseau D, Bonsang-Kitzis H, et al. Indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node detection in early breast cancer: Prospective evaluation of detection rate and toxicity-The FLUOBREAST trial. Breast J. 2020 Dec;26(12):2357–2363. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14100
15. Knackstedt R, Couto RA, Ko J, Cakmakoglu C, Wu D, Gastman B. Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging with Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma: Increasing the Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Rate. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3550–3560. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07617-z
16. Kawakami Y, Kondo K, Kawakita N, Matsuoka H, Toba H, Takizawa H, et al. Long-term outcomes of sentinel node identification using indocyanine green in patients with lung cancer. ThoracCancer. 2021 Jan;12(2):165–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13737
17. Imboden S, Mereu L, Siegenthaler F, Pellegrini A, Papadia A, Tateo S, Mueller MD. Oncological safety and perioperative morbidity in low-risk endometrial cancer with sentinel lymph-node dissection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;45(9):1638–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.026
18. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Tao H, Liang H, Chen Y, et al. Clinical application of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic lymph node dissection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A pilot study (with video). Surgery. 2022 Jun;171(6):1589–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.032
19. Ruzzenente A, Conci S, Isa G, Campagnaro T, Pedrazzani C, De Bellis M, et al. The LIverSEntinelLYmph-node (LISELY) study: A prospective intraoperative real time evaluation of liver lymphatic drainage and sentinel lymph-node using near-infrared (NIR) imaging with Indocyanine Green (ICG). Eur J SurgOncol. 2022 Dec;48(12):2455–2459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.035
20. Gavriilidis P, Bath NM, Pawlik TM. The impact of lymphadenectomy on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma management and prognosis: a comprehensive review. Hepatoma Research. 2023;9:24. https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2023.26
21. Yong TL, Houli N, Christophi C. Anatomy of hepatic lymphatics and its implications in hepatic malignancies. ANZ J Surg. 2016 Nov;86(11):868–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13662
Review
For citations:
Korshak A.V., Podluzhnyi D.V., Kotelnikov A.G., Egorov V.I., Abgaryan M.G., Batalova M.V., Makiev G.G., Tryakin A.A., Kantieva D.M., Manukyan M.Sh., Polyakov A.N. Intraoperative indocyanine green lymphography during lymph node dissection in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Research and Practical Medicine Journal. 2026;13(1):18-30. https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2026-13-1-2. EDN: BKHIPW
JATS XML


















